Sensitivity of dry edible bean to dicamba and 2,4-D

被引:1
|
作者
Bales, Scott R. [1 ]
Sprague, Christy L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Soil & Microbial Sci, 1066 Bogue St, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
2; 4-D choline; dicamba; dry bean; Phaseolus vulgaris L; Black bean; navy bean; off-target movement; spray tank contamination; HORSEWEED CONYZA-CANADENSIS; WEED MANAGEMENT; SPRAY DRIFT; GLYPHOSATE; RESISTANCE; HERBICIDES; INJURY; RESIDUES; SOYBEANS; RATES;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2019.127
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Dicamba and 2,4-D exposure to sensitive crops, such as dry bean, is of great concern with the recent registrations of dicamba- and 2,4-D-resistant soybean. In 2017 and 2018, field experiments were conducted at two Michigan locations to understand how multiple factors, including dry bean market class, herbicide rate, and application timing, influence dry bean response to dicamba and 2,4-D. Dicamba and 2,4-D at rates of 0.1%, 1%, and 10% of the field use rate for dicamba and 2,4-D choline were applied to V2 and V8 black and navy bean. Field-use rates for dicamba and 2,4-D choline were 560 and 1,120 g ae ha(-1), respectively. There were few differences between market classes or application timings when dry bean was exposed to dicamba or 2,4-D. Estimated rates to cause 20% dry bean injury 14 d after treatment were 4.5 and 107.5 g ae ha(-1) for dicamba and 2,4-D, respectively. When dicamba was applied at 56 g ae ha(-1), light interception was reduced up to 51% and maturity was delayed up to 16 d. Although both herbicides caused high levels of injury to dry bean, yield reductions were not consistently observed. At four site-years, 2,4-D did not reduce dry bean yield or seed weight with any rate tested. However, when averaged over site-years, dicamba rates of 3.7, 9.8 and 17.9 g ae ha(-1) were estimated to cause 5%, 10%, and 15% yield loss, respectively. Dicamba also reduced seed weight by 10% when 56 g ae ha(-1) was applied. However, the germination of harvested seed was not affected by dicamba or 2,4-D. Long delays in dry bean maturity from dicamba injury can also indirectly increase losses in yield and quality due to harvestability issues. This work further stresses the need for caution when using dicamba or 2,4-D herbicides near sensitive crops.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 124
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tank contamination with dicamba and 2,4-D influences dry edible bean
    Bales, Scott R.
    Sprague, Christy L.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (01) : 89 - 95
  • [2] APPLICATOR EXPOSURE TO 2,4-D, DICAMBA, AND A DICAMBA ISOMER
    DRAPER, WM
    STREET, JC
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD CONTAMINANTS AND AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 1982, 17 (04) : 321 - 339
  • [3] CROP SENSITIVITY TO DICAMBA AND 2,4-D APPLIED AT COMMERCIAL AND SUBDOSE LEVELS
    Boteon, Beatriz Fogolari
    da Silva, Rafaela Oliva
    Schedenffeldt, Bruna Ferrari
    Spricigo, Henrique
    Hirata, Andrea Cristina Silva
    Monquero, Patricia Andrea
    AGROCIENCIA, 2024, 58 (02)
  • [4] Baseline Sensitivity of Nebraska Waterhemp and Palmer Amaranth to Dicamba and 2,4-D
    Crespo, Roberto J.
    Wingeyer, Ana B.
    Borman, Christopher J.
    Bernards, Mark L.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2016, 108 (04) : 1649 - 1655
  • [5] Annual flower injury from sublethal rates of dicamba, 2,4-D, and premixed 2,4-D + mecoprop plus dicamba
    Hatterman-Valenti, H
    Mayland, P
    HORTSCIENCE, 2005, 40 (03) : 680 - 684
  • [6] Evaluation of 2,4-D and Dicamba genotoxicity in bean seedlings using comet and RAPD assays
    Cenkci, Suleyman
    Yildiz, Mustafa
    Cigerci, Ibrahim Hakki
    Bozdag, Ahmet
    Terzi, Hakan
    Terzi, Evrim Suna Arikan
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2010, 73 (07) : 1558 - 1564
  • [7] Sensitivity and Recovery of Tomato Cultivars Following Simulated Drift of Dicamba or 2,4-D
    Warmund, Michele R.
    Ellersieck, Mark R.
    Smeda, Reid J.
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [8] Effect of soybean growth stage on sensitivity to sublethal rates of dicamba and 2,4-D
    Scholtes, Alanna B.
    Sperry, Benjamin P.
    Reynolds, Daniel B.
    Irby, J. Trenton
    Eubank, Thomas W.
    Barber, L. Thomas
    Dodds, Darrin M.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (04) : 555 - 561
  • [9] Dissipation of 2,4-D and dicamba in a heterogeneous landscape
    Voos, G
    Groffman, PM
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 1997, 5 (02) : 181 - 187
  • [10] RESPONSE OF SOYBEANS TO 2,4-D, DICAMBA, AND PICLORAM
    WAX, LM
    KNUTH, LA
    SLIFE, FW
    WEED SCIENCE, 1969, 17 (03) : 388 - &