Statistical emulation of streamflow projections from a distributed hydrological model: Application to CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate projections for British Columbia, Canada

被引:33
|
作者
Schnorbus, Markus A. [1 ]
Cannon, Alex J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, Victoria, BC, Canada
关键词
FRASER-RIVER BASIN; CHANGE IMPACTS; WATER-RESOURCES; NEURAL-NETWORK; SOIL-MOISTURE; VARIABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; SURFACE; SNOWPACK; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1002/2014WR015279
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A recent hydrological impacts study in British Columbia, Canada, used an ensemble of 23 climate change simulations to assess potential future changes in streamflow. These Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) simulations were statistically downscaled and used to drive the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrology model over several watersheds. Due to computational restrictions, the 23 member VIC ensemble is a subset of the full 136 member CMIP3 archive. Extending the VIC ensemble to cover the full range of uncertainty represented by CMIP3, and incorporating the latest generation CMIP5 ensembles, poses a considerable computing challenge. Thus, we extend the VIC ensemble using a computationally efficient statistical emulation model, which approximates the combined output of the two-step process of statistical downscaling and hydrologic modeling, trained with the 23 member VIC ensemble. Regularized multiple linear regression links projected changes in monthly temperature and precipitation with projected changes in monthly streamflow over the Fraser and Peace River watersheds. Following validation, the statistical emulator is forced with the full suite of CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate change projections. The 23 member VIC ensemble has a smaller spread than the full ensemble; however, both ensembles provide the same consensus estimate of monthly streamflow change. Qualitatively, CMIP5 shows a similar streamflow response as CMIP3 for snow-dominated hydrologic regimes. However, by end-century, the CMIP5 worst-case RCP8.5 has a larger impact than CMIP3 A2. This work also underscores the advantage of using emulation to rapidly identify those future extreme projections that may merit further study using more computationally demanding process-based methods.
引用
收藏
页码:8907 / 8926
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Climate Model Projections for Canada: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Sobie, S. R.
    Zwiers, F. W.
    Curry, C. L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2021, 59 (4-5) : 269 - 284
  • [2] Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    Dufresne, J-L.
    Foujols, M-A.
    Denvil, S.
    Caubel, A.
    Marti, O.
    Aumont, O.
    Balkanski, Y.
    Bekki, S.
    Bellenger, H.
    Benshila, R.
    Bony, S.
    Bopp, L.
    Braconnot, P.
    Brockmann, P.
    Cadule, P.
    Cheruy, F.
    Codron, F.
    Cozic, A.
    Cugnet, D.
    de Noblet, N.
    Duvel, J-P.
    Ethe, C.
    Fairhead, L.
    Fichefet, T.
    Flavoni, S.
    Friedlingstein, P.
    Grandpeix, J-Y.
    Guez, L.
    Guilyardi, E.
    Hauglustaine, D.
    Hourdin, F.
    Idelkadi, A.
    Ghattas, J.
    Joussaume, S.
    Kageyama, M.
    Krinner, G.
    Labetoulle, S.
    Lahellec, A.
    Lefebvre, M-P.
    Lefevre, F.
    Levy, C.
    Li, Z. X.
    Lloyd, J.
    Lott, F.
    Madec, G.
    Mancip, M.
    Marchand, M.
    Masson, S.
    Meurdesoif, Y.
    Mignot, J.
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2013, 40 (9-10) : 2123 - 2165
  • [3] Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    J.-L. Dufresne
    M.-A. Foujols
    S. Denvil
    A. Caubel
    O. Marti
    O. Aumont
    Y. Balkanski
    S. Bekki
    H. Bellenger
    R. Benshila
    S. Bony
    L. Bopp
    P. Braconnot
    P. Brockmann
    P. Cadule
    F. Cheruy
    F. Codron
    A. Cozic
    D. Cugnet
    N. de Noblet
    J.-P. Duvel
    C. Ethé
    L. Fairhead
    T. Fichefet
    S. Flavoni
    P. Friedlingstein
    J.-Y. Grandpeix
    L. Guez
    E. Guilyardi
    D. Hauglustaine
    F. Hourdin
    A. Idelkadi
    J. Ghattas
    S. Joussaume
    M. Kageyama
    G. Krinner
    S. Labetoulle
    A. Lahellec
    M.-P. Lefebvre
    F. Lefevre
    C. Levy
    Z. X. Li
    J. Lloyd
    F. Lott
    G. Madec
    M. Mancip
    M. Marchand
    S. Masson
    Y. Meurdesoif
    J. Mignot
    [J]. Climate Dynamics, 2013, 40 : 2123 - 2165
  • [4] A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate model projections for hydrological impacts in China
    Lei, Yawen
    Chen, Jie
    Xiong, Lihua
    [J]. HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 54 (03): : 330 - 347
  • [5] Robustness of Precipitation Projections in China:Comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP3 Models
    CHEN Huo-Po
    SUN Jian-Qi
    [J]. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 2014, 7 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [6] Robustness of Precipitation Projections in China: Comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP3 Models
    Chen Huo-Po
    Sun Jian-Qi
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2014, 7 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [7] CMIP5 climate change projections for hydrological modelling in South Asia
    Zheng, Hongxing
    Chiew, Francis H. S.
    Charles, Steve
    [J]. 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2015), 2015, : 2409 - 2415
  • [8] Projections of Greenland climate change from CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Qinglin
    Huai, Baojuan
    Ding, Minghu
    Sun, Weijun
    Liu, Weigang
    Yan, Jinpei
    Zhao, Shuhui
    Wang, Yetang
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Lei
    Che, Jiahang
    Dou, Jiahui
    Kang, Limin
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2024, 232
  • [9] How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming
    D. Carvalho
    S. Rafael
    A. Monteiro
    V. Rodrigues
    M. Lopes
    A. Rocha
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [10] Evaluation of CMIP3 and CMIP5 Models over the Australian Region to Inform Confidence in Projections
    Moise, A.
    Wilson, L.
    Grose, M.
    Whetton, P.
    Watterson, I.
    Bhend, J.
    Bathols, J.
    Hanson, L.
    Erwin, T.
    Bedin, T.
    Heady, C.
    Rafter, T.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEANOGRAPHIC JOURNAL, 2015, 65 (01): : 19 - 53