Statistical emulation of streamflow projections from a distributed hydrological model: Application to CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate projections for British Columbia, Canada

被引:33
|
作者
Schnorbus, Markus A. [1 ]
Cannon, Alex J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, Victoria, BC, Canada
关键词
FRASER-RIVER BASIN; CHANGE IMPACTS; WATER-RESOURCES; NEURAL-NETWORK; SOIL-MOISTURE; VARIABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; SURFACE; SNOWPACK; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1002/2014WR015279
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A recent hydrological impacts study in British Columbia, Canada, used an ensemble of 23 climate change simulations to assess potential future changes in streamflow. These Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) simulations were statistically downscaled and used to drive the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrology model over several watersheds. Due to computational restrictions, the 23 member VIC ensemble is a subset of the full 136 member CMIP3 archive. Extending the VIC ensemble to cover the full range of uncertainty represented by CMIP3, and incorporating the latest generation CMIP5 ensembles, poses a considerable computing challenge. Thus, we extend the VIC ensemble using a computationally efficient statistical emulation model, which approximates the combined output of the two-step process of statistical downscaling and hydrologic modeling, trained with the 23 member VIC ensemble. Regularized multiple linear regression links projected changes in monthly temperature and precipitation with projected changes in monthly streamflow over the Fraser and Peace River watersheds. Following validation, the statistical emulator is forced with the full suite of CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate change projections. The 23 member VIC ensemble has a smaller spread than the full ensemble; however, both ensembles provide the same consensus estimate of monthly streamflow change. Qualitatively, CMIP5 shows a similar streamflow response as CMIP3 for snow-dominated hydrologic regimes. However, by end-century, the CMIP5 worst-case RCP8.5 has a larger impact than CMIP3 A2. This work also underscores the advantage of using emulation to rapidly identify those future extreme projections that may merit further study using more computationally demanding process-based methods.
引用
收藏
页码:8907 / 8926
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming
    Carvalho, D.
    Rafael, S.
    Monteiro, A.
    Rodrigues, V.
    Lopes, M.
    Rocha, A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [12] ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    Bellenger, H.
    Guilyardi, E.
    Leloup, J.
    Lengaigne, M.
    Vialard, J.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2014, 42 (7-8) : 1999 - 2018
  • [13] ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    H. Bellenger
    E. Guilyardi
    J. Leloup
    M. Lengaigne
    J. Vialard
    Climate Dynamics, 2014, 42 : 1999 - 2018
  • [14] Comparison of different statistical downscaling methods for climate change rainfall projections over the Lake Victoria basin considering CMIP3 and CMIP5
    Onyutha, Charles
    Tabari, Hossein
    Rutkowska, Agnieszka
    Nyeko-Ogiramoi, Paul
    Willems, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF HYDRO-ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2016, 12 : 31 - 45
  • [15] Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections
    Knutti, Reto
    Sedlacek, Jan
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 3 (04) : 369 - 373
  • [16] Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections
    Knutti R.
    Sedláček J.
    Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3 (4) : 369 - 373
  • [17] Evaluation of the AR4 CMIP3 and the AR5 CMIP5 Model and Projections for Precipitation in Northeast Brazil
    Alves, Jose M. B.
    Vasconcelos Junior, Francisco C.
    Chaves, Rosane R.
    Silva, Emerson M.
    Servain, Jacques
    Costa, Alexandre A.
    Sombra, Sergio S.
    Barbosa, Augusto C. B.
    dos Santos, Antonio C. S.
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2016, 4
  • [18] Global assessment of agreement among streamflow projections using CMIP5 model outputs
    Koirala, Sujan
    Hirabayashi, Yukiko
    Mahendran, Roobavannan
    Kanae, Shinjiro
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [19] Regional and seasonal intercomparison of CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate model ensembles for temperature and precipitation
    Devashish Kumar
    Evan Kodra
    Auroop R. Ganguly
    Climate Dynamics, 2014, 43 : 2491 - 2518
  • [20] Assessing model performance of climate extremes in China: an intercomparison between CMIP5 and CMIP3
    Huopo Chen
    Jianqi Sun
    Climatic Change, 2015, 129 : 197 - 211