Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture

被引:95
|
作者
Roberge, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Chaillet, Nils [3 ]
Boutin, Amelie [1 ,2 ]
Moore, Lynne [2 ,4 ]
Jastrow, Nicole [5 ]
Brassard, Normand [1 ]
Gauthier, Robert J. [3 ]
Hudic, Igor [6 ]
Shipp, Thomas D. [7 ]
Weimar, Charlotte H. E. [8 ]
Fatusic, Zlatan [6 ]
Demers, Suzanne [1 ]
Bujold, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G2, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G2, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Affilie Univ Quebec, Hop Enfant Jesus, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Geneva, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Hop Univ Geneve, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Clin Ctr, Clin Gynecol & Obstet, Tuzla, Bosnia & Herceg
[7] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Cesarean delivery; Hysterotomy; Pregnancy; Uterine rupture; Vaginal birth after cesarean; VAGINAL BIRTH; MISGAV-LADACH; 2-LAYER CLOSURE; SECTION; METAANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the best available evidence regarding the association between single-layer closure and uterine rupture. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant observational and experimental studies that included women with a previous single, low, transverse cesarean delivery who had attempted a trial of labor (TOL). The risks of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence were assessed by pooled odds ratios (OR) calculated with a random effects model. Results: Nine studies including 5810 women were reviewed. Overall, the risk of uterine rupture during TOL after a single-layer closure was not significantly different from that after a double-layer closure (OR 1.71; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.66-4.44). However, a sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk of uterine rupture was increased after a locked single-layer closure (OR 4.96; 95% Cl 2.58-9.52, P<0.001) but not after an unlocked single-layer closure (OR 0.49; 95% Cl 0.21-1.16), compared with a double-layer closure. Conclusion: Locked but not unlocked single-layer closures were associated with a higher uterine rupture risk than double-layer closure in women attempting a TOL (C) 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 10
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single- Versus Double-Layer Closure of the Hysterotomy Incision During Cesarean Delivery and Risk of Uterine Rupture EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Chaillet, Nils
    Boutin, Amelie
    Moore, Lynne
    Jastrow, Nicole
    Brassard, Normand
    Gauthier, Robert J.
    Hudic, Igor
    Shipp, Thomas D.
    Weimar, Charlotte H. E.
    Fatusic, Zlatan
    Demers, Suzanne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2012, 67 (01) : 14 - 15
  • [2] Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture
    Gyamfi, Cynthia
    Juhasz, Gabor
    Gyamfi, Phyllis
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    Stone, Joanne L.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (10): : 639 - 643
  • [3] Single-versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture
    Gyamfi, C
    Juhasz, G
    Gyamfi, P
    Rochon, M
    Blumenfeld, Y
    Stone, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S183 - S183
  • [4] Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions
    Blumenfeld, Y. J.
    Caughey, A. B.
    El-Sayed, Y. Y.
    Daniels, K.
    Lyell, D. J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 117 (06) : 690 - 694
  • [5] Impact of single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Vidaeff, AC
    Lucas, MJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (02) : 602 - 603
  • [6] The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Cruikshank, DP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 295 - 296
  • [7] The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Joura, EA
    Nather, A
    Hohlagschwandtner, M
    Husslein, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (03) : 895 - 895
  • [8] The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture - Reply
    Bujold, E
    Hamilton, EE
    Gauthier, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 296 - 296
  • [9] Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure
    Kataoka, Soromon
    Tanuma, Fumie
    Iwaki, Yutaka
    Iwaki, Kurumi
    Fujii, Takeru
    Fujimoto, Toshio
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (12) : 1352 - 1358
  • [10] Single- vs. double-layer uterine incision closure at primary cesarean section and adhesion formation
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    Caughey, Aaron
    El-Sayed, Yasser
    Daniels, Kay
    Lyell, Deirdre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S77 - S77