Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture

被引:95
|
作者
Roberge, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Chaillet, Nils [3 ]
Boutin, Amelie [1 ,2 ]
Moore, Lynne [2 ,4 ]
Jastrow, Nicole [5 ]
Brassard, Normand [1 ]
Gauthier, Robert J. [3 ]
Hudic, Igor [6 ]
Shipp, Thomas D. [7 ]
Weimar, Charlotte H. E. [8 ]
Fatusic, Zlatan [6 ]
Demers, Suzanne [1 ]
Bujold, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G2, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G2, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Affilie Univ Quebec, Hop Enfant Jesus, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Geneva, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Hop Univ Geneve, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Clin Ctr, Clin Gynecol & Obstet, Tuzla, Bosnia & Herceg
[7] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Cesarean delivery; Hysterotomy; Pregnancy; Uterine rupture; Vaginal birth after cesarean; VAGINAL BIRTH; MISGAV-LADACH; 2-LAYER CLOSURE; SECTION; METAANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the best available evidence regarding the association between single-layer closure and uterine rupture. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant observational and experimental studies that included women with a previous single, low, transverse cesarean delivery who had attempted a trial of labor (TOL). The risks of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence were assessed by pooled odds ratios (OR) calculated with a random effects model. Results: Nine studies including 5810 women were reviewed. Overall, the risk of uterine rupture during TOL after a single-layer closure was not significantly different from that after a double-layer closure (OR 1.71; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.66-4.44). However, a sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk of uterine rupture was increased after a locked single-layer closure (OR 4.96; 95% Cl 2.58-9.52, P<0.001) but not after an unlocked single-layer closure (OR 0.49; 95% Cl 0.21-1.16), compared with a double-layer closure. Conclusion: Locked but not unlocked single-layer closures were associated with a higher uterine rupture risk than double-layer closure in women attempting a TOL (C) 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 10
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single versus double layer closure of low transverse uterine incision at cesarean section
    Kumar, Sood Atul
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2005, 55 (03): : 231 - 236
  • [22] Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study
    Tekiner, Nur Betul
    Cetin, Berna Aslan
    Turkgeldi, Lale Susan
    Yilmaz, Gokce
    Polat, Ibrahim
    Gedikbasi, Ali
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 297 (05) : 1137 - 1143
  • [23] Single-Versus Double-Layer Hysterotomy Closure at Primary Caesarean Delivery and Bladder Adhesions
    Blumenfeld, Y. J.
    Caughey, A. B.
    El-Sayed, Y. Y.
    Daniels, K.
    Lyella, D. J.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2010, 65 (08) : 482 - 484
  • [24] Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study
    Nur Betül Tekiner
    Berna Aslan Çetin
    Lale Susan Türkgeldi
    Gökçe Yılmaz
    İbrahim Polat
    Ali Gedikbaşı
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 297 : 1137 - 1143
  • [25] Beyond single- vs double-layer closure: optimizing uterine repair in cesarean delivery with endometrium-free technique
    Antoine, Clarel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 232 (03) : e198 - e198
  • [26] Authors' Response to the Letter to the Editor: Single-vs. Double-Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery
    Bamberg, Christian
    Hinkson, Larry
    Henrich, Wolfgang
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2017, 38 (04): : 449 - 449
  • [27] The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Bujold, E
    Bujold, C
    Hamilton, EF
    Harel, F
    Gauthier, RJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) : 1326 - 1330
  • [28] Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy
    Vachon-Marceau, Chantale
    Demers, Suzanne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Gauthier, Robert J.
    Pasquier, Jean-Charles
    Girard, Mario
    Chaillet, Nils
    Boulvain, Michel
    Jastrow, Nicole
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (01) : 65.e1 - 65.e5
  • [29] Purse-string double-layer closure: A novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section
    Turan, Cem
    Buyukbayrak, Esra Esim
    Yilmaz, Aylin Onan
    Karsidag, Yasemin Karageyim
    Pirimoglu, Meltem
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (04) : 565 - 574
  • [30] Single versus double layer closure and the risk of uterine rupture: A multicentre VBAC study
    Goyet, M
    Bujold, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S20 - S20