Single- Versus Double-Layer Closure of the Hysterotomy Incision During Cesarean Delivery and Risk of Uterine Rupture EDITORIAL COMMENT

被引:4
|
作者
Roberge, Stephanie [1 ]
Chaillet, Nils
Boutin, Amelie
Moore, Lynne
Jastrow, Nicole
Brassard, Normand
Gauthier, Robert J.
Hudic, Igor
Shipp, Thomas D.
Weimar, Charlotte H. E.
Fatusic, Zlatan
Demers, Suzanne
Bujold, Emmanuel
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182439e50
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Techniques used for closure of the hysterotomy site following cesarean delivery include the use of interrupted, locked, and unlocked continuous sutures with single-or double-layer closure. The specific technique used may be associated with risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labor (TOL) in future pregnancies. In a recent systematic review, single-layer closure but not double-layer closure was shown to reduce operating time and blood loss. However, a large randomized controlled trial published in 2010 found no such benefit for single-layer closure. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effect of single-versus double-layer closure on risk of uterine rupture. A search of the electronic databases-PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-was conducted to identify relevant citations published up to 2010 that included data on women with a previous single, low, transverse cesarean delivery who underwent TOL. Both observational and experimental studies were included in the search. To assess the risk of uterine rupture and uterine dehiscence, random effects models were used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Data from 9 studies including 5810 women met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significantly higher overall risk of uterine rupture during TOL after use of a single-layer closure compared with a double-layer closure; the OR was 1.71, with a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.66-4.44 (P = 0.27). Compared with a double-layer closure, the use of a locked single-layer closure (OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 2.58-9.52, P < 0.001) but not an unlocked single-layer closure (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.21-1.16, P = 0.1) was associated with increased risk of uterine rupture. These findings show that the risk of uterine rupture in women attempting a TOL is significantly higher with use of a locked single-layer closure than either an unlocked single-layer closure or a double-layer closure.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 15
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Chaillet, Nils
    Boutin, Amelie
    Moore, Lynne
    Jastrow, Nicole
    Brassard, Normand
    Gauthier, Robert J.
    Hudic, Igor
    Shipp, Thomas D.
    Weimar, Charlotte H. E.
    Fatusic, Zlatan
    Demers, Suzanne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 115 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [2] Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture
    Gyamfi, Cynthia
    Juhasz, Gabor
    Gyamfi, Phyllis
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    Stone, Joanne L.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (10): : 639 - 643
  • [3] Single-versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture
    Gyamfi, C
    Juhasz, G
    Gyamfi, P
    Rochon, M
    Blumenfeld, Y
    Stone, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S183 - S183
  • [4] Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions
    Blumenfeld, Y. J.
    Caughey, A. B.
    El-Sayed, Y. Y.
    Daniels, K.
    Lyell, D. J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 117 (06) : 690 - 694
  • [5] Impact of single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Vidaeff, AC
    Lucas, MJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (02) : 602 - 603
  • [6] The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Cruikshank, DP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 295 - 296
  • [7] The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture
    Joura, EA
    Nather, A
    Hohlagschwandtner, M
    Husslein, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (03) : 895 - 895
  • [8] The impact of a single- or double-layer closure on uterine rupture - Reply
    Bujold, E
    Hamilton, EE
    Gauthier, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 296 - 296
  • [9] Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure
    Kataoka, Soromon
    Tanuma, Fumie
    Iwaki, Yutaka
    Iwaki, Kurumi
    Fujii, Takeru
    Fujimoto, Toshio
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (12) : 1352 - 1358
  • [10] Single- vs. double-layer uterine incision closure at primary cesarean section and adhesion formation
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    Caughey, Aaron
    El-Sayed, Yasser
    Daniels, Kay
    Lyell, Deirdre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S77 - S77