Input-output selection for planar tensegrity models

被引:21
|
作者
de Jager, B
Skelton, RE
机构
[1] Tech Univ Eindhoven, Dept Mech Engn, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Aerosp Engn & Mech, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
flexible structures; H infinity control; input-output selection; intelligent structures; optimization methods; structural control; tensegrity structures; vibration control;
D O I
10.1109/TCST.2005.847346
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The input-output selection approach followed in this brief uses a rigorous and systematic procedure, efficiently selecting actuators and/or sensors that guarantee a desired level of performance, embedded in a heuristic. The procedure generates all so-called minimal dependent sets and uses a closed-loop criterion. The heuristic is a divide-and-conquer one. This approach is applied to controlled tensegrity structures, using as criterion efficiently computable conditions for the existence of a stabilizing H-infinity controller achieving a desired level of performance. Structural systems, like controlled tensegrities, are a prime example for application of techniques that address system design issues, because they present opportunities in choosing actuators/sensors and in choosing their mechanical structure. Results for a three-unit planar tensegrity structure, where all 26 tendons can be used as actuator or sensor devices, making up 52 devices from which to choose, demonstrate the approach. Two design specifications were explored, one is related to the dynamical stiffness of the structure, the other to vibration isolation. The feasible sets of actuators and sensors depend on the specifications and really differ for both, but are mostly composed of much less than 52 devices.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 785
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] REGIONAL AND INTERREGIONAL INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS - AN APPRAISAL
    TIEBOUT, CM
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1957, 24 (02) : 140 - 147
  • [32] APPROXIMATE AGGREGATION AND ERROR IN INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS
    GIBBONS, JC
    WOLSKY, AM
    TOLLEY, G
    RESOURCES AND ENERGY, 1982, 4 (03): : 203 - 230
  • [33] SPATIAL AGGREGATION IN MULTIREGIONAL INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS
    BLAIR, P
    MILLER, RE
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1983, 15 (02) : 187 - 206
  • [34] A NOTE ON IMPORT COEFFICIENTS IN INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS
    HEFNER, F
    REVIEW OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 1989, 24 (02): : 85 - 88
  • [35] REVIEW OF INDUSTRY AGGREGATION IN INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS
    KYMN, KO
    NORSWORTHY, JR
    AMERICAN ECONOMIST, 1976, 20 (01): : 5 - 10
  • [36] A Robust MPC for Input-Output LPV Models
    Abbas, Hossam S.
    Toth, Roland
    Meskin, Nader
    Mohammadpour, Javad
    Hanema, Jurre
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2016, 61 (12) : 4183 - 4188
  • [37] Aggregate Input-Output Models of Neuronal Populations
    Saxena, Shreya
    Schieber, Marc H.
    Thakor, Nitish V.
    Sarma, Sridevi V.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 59 (07) : 2030 - 2039
  • [38] Structural change optimization in input-output models
    Vaninsky, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY MATHEMATICS, 2009, 12 (06) : 839 - 861
  • [39] Minimizing aggregation error in input-output models
    Murray, AT
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1998, 30 (06) : 1125 - 1128
  • [40] CONDITIONS FOR COEFFICIENT STABILITY IN INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS
    CAUDILL, SB
    HOLCOMBE, RG
    REVIEW OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 1988, 23 (02): : 29 - 37