Input-output selection for planar tensegrity models

被引:21
|
作者
de Jager, B
Skelton, RE
机构
[1] Tech Univ Eindhoven, Dept Mech Engn, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Aerosp Engn & Mech, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
flexible structures; H infinity control; input-output selection; intelligent structures; optimization methods; structural control; tensegrity structures; vibration control;
D O I
10.1109/TCST.2005.847346
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The input-output selection approach followed in this brief uses a rigorous and systematic procedure, efficiently selecting actuators and/or sensors that guarantee a desired level of performance, embedded in a heuristic. The procedure generates all so-called minimal dependent sets and uses a closed-loop criterion. The heuristic is a divide-and-conquer one. This approach is applied to controlled tensegrity structures, using as criterion efficiently computable conditions for the existence of a stabilizing H-infinity controller achieving a desired level of performance. Structural systems, like controlled tensegrities, are a prime example for application of techniques that address system design issues, because they present opportunities in choosing actuators/sensors and in choosing their mechanical structure. Results for a three-unit planar tensegrity structure, where all 26 tendons can be used as actuator or sensor devices, making up 52 devices from which to choose, demonstrate the approach. Two design specifications were explored, one is related to the dynamical stiffness of the structure, the other to vibration isolation. The feasible sets of actuators and sensors depend on the specifications and really differ for both, but are mostly composed of much less than 52 devices.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 785
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Model order selection of nonlinear input-output models - a clustering based approach
    Feil, B
    Abonyi, J
    Szeifert, F
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2004, 14 (06) : 593 - 602
  • [22] INPUT-OUTPUT MULTIPLIERS WITH ERRORS IN INPUT-OUTPUT COEFFICIENTS
    PARK, SH
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1973, 6 (04) : 399 - 403
  • [23] ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLIERS IN STOCHASTIC INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS
    JANSEN, PSMK
    REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1994, 24 (01) : 55 - 74
  • [24] Input-output models for a class of nonlinear systems
    Atassi, AN
    Khalil, HK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 1997, : 2853 - 2857
  • [25] SUMMARY MEASURES OF INTERCONNECTEDNESS FOR INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS
    HAMILTON, JR
    JENSEN, RC
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1983, 15 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [26] ANALYTIC PROBLEMS IN THE AGGREGATION OF INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS
    HOWE, EC
    JOHNSON, CR
    APPLICATIONS OF MATRIX THEORY, 1989, 22 : 29 - 61
  • [27] ALTERNATIVE TO INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS - METHODOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS
    BROMLEY, DW
    LAND ECONOMICS, 1972, 48 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [28] DISAGGREGATING INPUT-OUTPUT MODELS WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION
    Lindner, Soeren
    Legault, Julien
    Guan, Dabo
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (04) : 329 - 347
  • [29] Analysis of water pollution with input-output models
    Pac, RD
    Sánchez-Chóliz, J
    APPLIED SCIENCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1998, : 311 - 329
  • [30] Reinforcement Learning with Symbolic Input-Output Models
    Derner, Erik
    Kubalik, Jiri
    Babska, Robert
    2018 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2018, : 3004 - 3009