Multiple peer-assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes

被引:49
|
作者
Yu, Fu-Yun [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Educ, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
关键词
Applications in subject areas; Computer-mediated communication; Cooperative/collaborative learning; Teaching/learning strategies; MATHEMATICS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.025
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In view of the current theoretical and empirical support for a student-generated questions approach to learning along with the advantageous features of network technology, several online student question-generation learning systems with a peer-assessment component have been developed. Despite this, all existing systems are limited in terms of the types of communication modes permissible for peer-assessment. Online discourse experience and the quantity and quality of interaction may vary as a result of the specific interaction mode students are exposed to. Because of this and the fact that versatile learning spaces are both possible and potentially desirable during the various stages of learning and teaching, multiple peer-assessment modes were created, and the overall attitudes of learners toward peer-assessment as well as their preferences toward respective peer-assessment modes were examined. The collected data confirmed the perceived usefulness of peer-assessment for developing higher-order thinking and cognitive elaboration. Support was demonstrated for student question-generation activities, for which learners typically have limited prior experience. Additionally, in light of the apparent overwhelming preference for and superiority of the more interactive two-way and multi-way modes over the one-way mode and the perceived learning potential of these modes, it is suggested that designers of similar systems should consider their inclusion. Finally, even though multi-way learning was found to be both the preferred and most supportive mode for learning, students also revealed distinct reasons for their preferences for respective interaction modes. In general, these reasons supported the premise that multiple peer-assessment modes are needed in order to accommodate individual preferences and needs. Suggestions and implications for instructional implementation, system development, and future studies are offered. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 494
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning
    Barak, M
    Rafaeli, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2004, 61 (01) : 84 - 103
  • [32] Fostering student cognitive engagement in a large-class Biology undergraduate module using a question-generation assignment.
    Yeong, F. M.
    Chin, C. F.
    Tan, A. L.
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2016, 27
  • [33] Online self- and peer-assessment for teacher professional development: A case study of the process and the perceived impact
    Singh, Shambhavi
    Mahapatra, Santosh
    TESOL JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (02)
  • [34] peerScholar: an Evidence-Based Online Peer-Assessment Tool Supporting Critical Thinking and Clear Communication
    Joordens, Steve
    Pare, Dwayne
    Pruesse, Ky
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING, 2009, : 236 - 240
  • [35] Are There Any Joint Effects of Online Student Question Generation and Cooperative Learning?
    Fu-Yun Yu
    Chun-Ping Wu
    Chung-Chi Hung
    The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2014, 23 : 367 - 378
  • [36] Are There Any Joint Effects of Online Student Question Generation and Cooperative Learning?
    Yu, Fu-Yun
    Wu, Chun-Ping
    Hung, Chung-Chi
    ASIA-PACIFIC EDUCATION RESEARCHER, 2014, 23 (03): : 367 - 378
  • [37] Validity evidence for using an online peer-assessment tool (CATME) to assess individual contributions to interprofessional student teamwork in a longitudinal team-based learning course
    Earnest, Mark
    Madigosky, Wendy S.
    Hanson, Janice L.
    Yamashita, Traci
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2022, 36 (06) : 923 - 931
  • [38] Automatic detection of inconsistencies between numerical scores and textual feedback in peer-assessment processes with machine learning
    Ramon Rico-Juan, Juan
    Gallego, Antonio-Javier
    Calvo-Zaragoza, Jorge
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2019, 140
  • [39] SCREENCASTS AS A LEARNING TOOL TARGETED TO TRAIN ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY: STUDENT PERCEPTION OF THE METHODOLOGY AND OF SELF- AND PEER-ASSESSMENT
    Cebolla-Cornejo, J.
    Leiva-Brondo, M.
    Peiro, R.
    Perez-de-Castro, A. M.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED), 2018, : 2504 - 2511
  • [40] Augmenting assessment with AI coding of online student discourse: A question of reliability
    Misiejuk K.
    Kaliisa R.
    Scianna J.
    Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 6