Positive end-expiratory pressure following coronary artery bypass grafting

被引:0
|
作者
Dongelmans, D. A. [1 ]
Hemmes, S. N. [1 ,2 ]
Kudoga, A. C. [1 ]
Veelo, D. P. [1 ]
Binnekade, J. M. [1 ]
Schultz, M. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, LEICA, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] HERMES Crit Care Grp, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Respiration; artificial; Ventilator weaning; Positive-pressure respiration; Patient compliance; Thoracic surgery; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; ACUTE LUNG INJURY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; TIDAL VOLUME; VENTILATION; PULMONARY; RECRUITMENT; EXTUBATION; SUPPORT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Cardiac surgery-related pulmonary complications include alterations in lung mechanics and anomalies in gas exchange. Higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been suggested to benefit cardiac surgical patients. We compared respiratory compliance, arterial oxygenation and time rill tracheal extubation in 2 cohorts of patients weaned from mechanical ventilation with different levels of PEEP after elective and uncomplicated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We hypothesized that higher PEEP levels improve pulmonary compliance and gas exchange in the first hours of weaning from mechanical ventilation, but not to shorten time till tracheal extubation. Methods. Secondary retrospective analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials: in the first trial patients were weaned with PEEP levels of 10 cmH(2)O for the first 4 hours followed by PEEP levels of 5 cmH(2)O until tracheal extubation (high PEEP, HP); and the second trial patients were weaned with PEEP levels of 5 cmH(2)O during the entire weaning phase (low PEEP LP). The primary endpoint was pulmonary compliance. Secondary endpoints included arterial oxygenation, duration of mechanical ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications. Results. The analysis included 121 patients; 60 HP patients and 61 LP patients. Baseline characteristics were similar. Compared to LP patients, HP patients had a better pulmonary compliance, 47.2 +/- 14.1 versus 42.7 +/- 10.2 ml/cmH(2)O (P<0.05), and higher levels PaO2, 18.5 +/- 6.6 (138.75 +/- 49.5) versus 16.7 +/- 5.4 (125.25 +/- 40.5) kPa (mmHg) (P<0.05). Patients in the HP group were less frequent in need of supplementary oxygen after ICU discharge. These differences remained present during the entire weaning phase, even after reduction of PEEP. However, HP patients had a longer time rill tracheal extubation, 16.9 +/- 6.1 versus 10.5 +/- 5.0 hours (P<0.001). HP patients had longer durations of postoperative infusion of propofol, 4.9 (2.6-7.4) versus 3.5 (1.8-5.8) hours (P<0.05). There were no differences in use of inotropes. Cummulative fluid balances were sligthly higher in HP patients. Conclusion. Use of higher PEEP levels after elective uncomplicated CABG improves pulmonary compliance and oxygenation but seems to be associated with a delay in tracheal extubation. (Minerva Anestesiol 2012;78:790-800)
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 800
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFECT OF POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE ON INTRAABDOMINAL PRESSURE
    SUSSMAN, AM
    BOYD, CR
    WILLIAMS, JS
    DIBENEDETTO, RJ
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 84 (06) : 697 - 700
  • [32] EFFECT OF POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE ON EXTRADURAL PRESSURE
    SHAH, JL
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 59 (07) : P940 - P940
  • [33] Use and titration of positive end-expiratory pressure
    Khan, Mansoor A.
    Frankel, Heidi L.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN SURGERY, 2013, 50 (10) : 446 - 451
  • [34] MECHANICS OF VENTILATION WITH POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE
    HOBELMANN, CF
    SMITH, DE
    VIRGILIO, RW
    PETERS, RM
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1977, 24 (01): : 68 - 76
  • [35] Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Mechanical Power
    Collino, Francesca
    Rapetti, Francesca
    Vasques, Francesco
    Maiolo, Giorgia
    Tonetti, Tommaso
    Romitti, Federica
    Niewenhuys, Julia
    Behnemann, Tim
    Camporota, Luigi
    Hahn, Guenter
    Reupke, Verena
    Holke, Karin
    Herrmann, Peter
    Duscio, Eleonora
    Cipulli, Francesco
    Moerer, Onnen
    Marini, John J.
    Quintel, Michael
    Gattinoni, Luciano
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 130 (01) : 119 - 130
  • [36] REFLEX RESPONSES TO POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE
    TYLER, DC
    NESSLY, M
    CHENEY, FW
    RESPIRATION PHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 56 (02): : 261 - 267
  • [37] SPONTANEOUS POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE (SPEEP)
    GILLICK, JS
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1977, 56 (05): : 627 - 632
  • [38] THE CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS OF POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE
    PICK, RA
    HANDLER, JB
    MURATA, GH
    FRIEDMAN, AS
    CHEST, 1982, 82 (03) : 345 - 350
  • [39] Hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure
    Joseph, Adrien
    Petit, Matthieu
    Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 30 (01) : 10 - 19
  • [40] Obesity and Positive End-expiratory Pressure: Reply
    Simon, Philipp
    Girrbach, Felix
    Petroff, David
    Wrigge, Hermann
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 135 (06) : 1160 - U24