Target modality affects visually guided online control of reaching

被引:9
|
作者
Cameron, Brendan D. [1 ]
Lopez-Moliner, Joan
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Psicol Basica, Vis & Control Act Grp, Barcelona 08035, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
Action; Online control; Reaching; Proprioception; Vision; SENSORY INTEGRATION; HAND ORIENTATION; FEEDBACK; MOVEMENTS; POSITION; ADJUSTMENTS; DIRECTION; VISION; MODEL; END;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2014.06.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The integration of vision and proprioception for estimating the hand's starting location prior to a reach has been shown to depend on the modality of the target towards which the reach is planned. Here we investigated whether the processing of online feedback is also influenced by target modality. Participants made reaching movements to a target that was defined by vision, proprioception, or both, and visual feedback about the unfolding movement was either present or absent. To measure online control we used the variability across trials; we examined the course of this variability for the different target modalities and effector conditions. Our results showed that the rate of decrease in variability in the later part of the movements (an indicator of online control) was minimally influenced by effector vision when participants reached towards a proprioceptive target, whereas the rate of decrease was clearly influenced by effector vision when participants reached towards a visual target. In other words, when participants reached towards a proprioceptively defined target they relied less on visual information about the moving hand than when they reached towards a visually defined target. These results suggest that target modality influences visual processing for online control. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 243
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Purkinje cells in the lateral cerebellum of the cat encode visual events and target motion during visually guided reaching
    Miles, ÖB
    Cerminara, NL
    Marple-Horvat, DE
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2006, 571 (03): : 619 - 637
  • [42] COMPARISON OF VISUALLY GUIDED REACHING IN NORMAL AND DEPRIVED INFANT MONKEYS
    BAUER, J
    HELD, R
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1975, 1 (04): : 298 - 308
  • [43] Decoupling eye and hand movement direction in visually guided reaching
    Carey, D
    McRitchie, R
    PERCEPTION, 2004, 33 : 26 - 26
  • [44] Numeric comparison in a visually-guided manual reaching task
    Song, Joo-Hyun
    Nakayama, Ken
    COGNITION, 2008, 106 (02) : 994 - 1003
  • [45] LOCOMOTORY SPACE AS A PREREQUISITE FOR ACQUIRING VISUALLY GUIDED REACHING IN KITTENS
    HEIN, A
    DIAMOND, RM
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 81 (03): : 394 - 398
  • [46] DIFFERENCES IN THE ORGANIZATION OF VISUALLY GUIDED REACHING TO IPSILATERAL AND CONTRALATERAL TARGETS
    FISK, JD
    GOODALE, MA
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1984, 12 (02) : 189 - 190
  • [47] Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching
    Clower, DM
    Hoffman, JM
    Votaw, JR
    Faber, TL
    Woods, RP
    Alexander, GE
    NATURE, 1996, 383 (6601) : 618 - 621
  • [48] Is prior knowledge of object geometry used in visually guided reaching?
    Hartung, B
    Schrater, PR
    Bülthoff, HH
    Kersten, D
    Franz, VH
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2005, 5 (06): : 504 - 514
  • [49] Reaching for the unreachable: integration of locomotion and whole-body movements for extended visually guided reaching
    Brandao, Martim
    Jamone, Lorenzo
    Kryczka, Przemyslaw
    Endo, Nobotsuna
    Hashimoto, Kenji
    Takanishi, Atsuo
    2013 13TH IEEE-RAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANOID ROBOTS (HUMANOIDS), 2013, : 28 - 33
  • [50] INTEGRATION IN DESCENDING MOTOR PATHWAYS CONTROLLING THE FORELIMB IN THE CAT .16. VISUALLY GUIDED SWITCHING OF TARGET-REACHING
    ALSTERMARK, B
    GORSKA, T
    LUNDBERG, A
    PETTERSSON, LG
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1990, 80 (01) : 1 - 11