Target modality affects visually guided online control of reaching

被引:9
|
作者
Cameron, Brendan D. [1 ]
Lopez-Moliner, Joan
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Psicol Basica, Vis & Control Act Grp, Barcelona 08035, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
Action; Online control; Reaching; Proprioception; Vision; SENSORY INTEGRATION; HAND ORIENTATION; FEEDBACK; MOVEMENTS; POSITION; ADJUSTMENTS; DIRECTION; VISION; MODEL; END;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2014.06.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The integration of vision and proprioception for estimating the hand's starting location prior to a reach has been shown to depend on the modality of the target towards which the reach is planned. Here we investigated whether the processing of online feedback is also influenced by target modality. Participants made reaching movements to a target that was defined by vision, proprioception, or both, and visual feedback about the unfolding movement was either present or absent. To measure online control we used the variability across trials; we examined the course of this variability for the different target modalities and effector conditions. Our results showed that the rate of decrease in variability in the later part of the movements (an indicator of online control) was minimally influenced by effector vision when participants reached towards a proprioceptive target, whereas the rate of decrease was clearly influenced by effector vision when participants reached towards a visual target. In other words, when participants reached towards a proprioceptively defined target they relied less on visual information about the moving hand than when they reached towards a visually defined target. These results suggest that target modality influences visual processing for online control. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 243
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ASYMMETRIES IN THE DISCRETE AND PSEUDOCONTINUOUS REGULATION OF VISUALLY GUIDED REACHING
    CARSON, RG
    GOODMAN, D
    ELLIOTT, D
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1992, 18 (02) : 169 - 191
  • [32] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SPINAL-CORD LESIONS ON VISUALLY GUIDED SWITCHING OF TARGET-REACHING IN CATS
    ALSTERMARK, B
    GORSKA, T
    LUNDBERG, A
    PETTERSSON, LG
    WALKOWSKA, M
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 1987, 5 (01) : 63 - 67
  • [33] Visually guided control of locomotor pointing: Importance of optical expansion of the target
    de Rugy, A.
    Montagne, G.
    Buekers, M. J.
    Laurent, M.
    PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 : 121 - 121
  • [34] Statistical extraction affects visually guided action
    Corbett, Jennifer E.
    Song, Joo-Hyun
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2014, 22 (07) : 881 - 895
  • [35] Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching
    Mark, LS
    Nemeth, K
    Gardner, D
    Dainoff, MJ
    Paasche, J
    Duffy, M
    Grandt, K
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1997, 23 (05) : 1365 - 1379
  • [36] VISUALLY GUIDED REACHING IN INFANT MONKEYS AFTER RESTRICTED REARING
    HELD, R
    BAUER, JA
    SCIENCE, 1967, 155 (3763) : 718 - &
  • [37] Reverse Visually Guided Reaching in Patients with Parkinson's Disease
    Gaprielian, Pauline
    Scott, Stephen H. H.
    Levy, Ron
    PARKINSONS DISEASE, 2022, 2022
  • [38] Descending pathways controlling visually guided updating of reaching in cats
    Pettersson, LG
    Perfiliev, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 16 (07) : 1349 - 1360
  • [39] A developmental approach to visually-guided reaching in artificial systems
    Metta, G
    Sandini, G
    Konczak, J
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 1999, 12 (10) : 1413 - 1427
  • [40] Calibration to tool use during visually-guided reaching
    Day, Brian
    Ebrahimi, Elham
    Hartman, Leah S.
    Pagano, Christopher C.
    Babu, Sabarish V.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2017, 181 : 27 - 39