An item response theory analysis of the PTSD checklist for DSM-5: Implications for DSM-5 and ICD-11

被引:15
|
作者
Silverstein, Madison W. [1 ]
Petri, Jessica M. [2 ]
Kramer, Lindsay B. [2 ]
Weathers, Frank W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Dept Psychol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
Item response theory; Posttraumatic stress disorder; PCL-5; DSM-5; ICD-11; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE; SYMPTOMS; MILITARY; CRITERIA; VETERANS; BEHAVIOR; SPANISH;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102190
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is a widely used, extensively validated questionnaire for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The PCL was revised for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5; Friedman, 2013), and the updated version, the PCL-5, has continued the strong psychometric performance of the original version. To further explore the PCL-5's psychometric properties, we used item response theory (IRT) to examine item difficulty and discrimination parameters in separate samples of trauma-exposed undergraduates (N = 1213) and community members (N = 367). Considering item difficulty, nightmares, flashbacks, and reckless or self-destructive behavior emerged among the most difficult items across samples and internal avoidance emerged as the least difficult items across samples. In terms of item discrimination, inability to experience positive emotions, detachment from others, diminished interest, and negative emotions emerged as highly discriminating items in both samples, and traumatic amnesia and reckless or self-destructive behavior emerged as the least discriminating items in both samples. These results have implications for the divergent conceptualizations of PTSD in DSM-5 versus International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition (ICD-11; WHO, 2018). Future research should employ IRT in a clinical population.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DSM-5 and ICD-11
    Pull, Charles B.
    ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2014, 172 (08): : 677 - 680
  • [2] Adjustment disorder: implications for ICD-11 and DSM-5
    Casey, Patricia
    Doherty, Anne
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 201 (02) : 90 - 92
  • [3] Psychotic disorders in DSM-5 and ICD-11
    Biedermann, Falko
    Fleischhacker, W. Wolfgang
    CNS SPECTRUMS, 2016, 21 (04) : 349 - 354
  • [4] Parental Alienation: DSM-5 and ICD-11
    Kaslow, Florence W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 2011, 39 (03): : 274 - 276
  • [5] DSM-5 and ICD-11: toward harmonization
    Kupfer, D. J.
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2013, 15 : 19 - 20
  • [6] Child Maltreatment in DSM-5 and ICD-11
    Slep, Amy M. Smith
    Heyman, Richard E.
    Foran, Heather M.
    FAMILY PROCESS, 2015, 54 (01) : 17 - 32
  • [7] Will mania survive DSM-5 and ICD-11?
    Angst J.
    International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 3 (1) : 1 - 3
  • [8] Parental Alienation, DSM-5, and ICD-11
    Shapiro, Gabrielle
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 50 (10): : 1078 - 1079
  • [10] Parental Alienation, DSM-5, and ICD-11
    Habib, Paola
    Madaan, Vishal
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 74 (03) : E220 - E220