An item response theory analysis of the PTSD checklist for DSM-5: Implications for DSM-5 and ICD-11

被引:15
|
作者
Silverstein, Madison W. [1 ]
Petri, Jessica M. [2 ]
Kramer, Lindsay B. [2 ]
Weathers, Frank W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Dept Psychol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
Item response theory; Posttraumatic stress disorder; PCL-5; DSM-5; ICD-11; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE; SYMPTOMS; MILITARY; CRITERIA; VETERANS; BEHAVIOR; SPANISH;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102190
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is a widely used, extensively validated questionnaire for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The PCL was revised for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5; Friedman, 2013), and the updated version, the PCL-5, has continued the strong psychometric performance of the original version. To further explore the PCL-5's psychometric properties, we used item response theory (IRT) to examine item difficulty and discrimination parameters in separate samples of trauma-exposed undergraduates (N = 1213) and community members (N = 367). Considering item difficulty, nightmares, flashbacks, and reckless or self-destructive behavior emerged among the most difficult items across samples and internal avoidance emerged as the least difficult items across samples. In terms of item discrimination, inability to experience positive emotions, detachment from others, diminished interest, and negative emotions emerged as highly discriminating items in both samples, and traumatic amnesia and reckless or self-destructive behavior emerged as the least discriminating items in both samples. These results have implications for the divergent conceptualizations of PTSD in DSM-5 versus International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition (ICD-11; WHO, 2018). Future research should employ IRT in a clinical population.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Classification of diseases and the neurodevelopmental disorders: the challenge for DSM-5 and ICD-11
    Baird, Gillian
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2013, 55 (03): : 200 - 201
  • [42] Personality impairment in the DSM-5 and ICD-11: Current standing and limitations
    Sleep, Chelsea
    Lynam, Donald R.
    Miller, Joshua D.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 34 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [43] Editorial Commentary: Challenges and potential of DSM-5 and ICD-11 revisions
    Leckman, James F.
    Pine, Daniel S.
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 53 (05) : 449 - 453
  • [44] Diagnostics of posttraumatic stress disorder according to DSM-5 and ICD-11
    Schellong, Julia
    Hanschmidt, Franz
    Ehring, Thomas
    Knaevelsrud, Christine
    Schaefer, Ingo
    Rau, Heinrich
    Dyer, Anne
    Krueger-Gottschalk, Antje
    NERVENARZT, 2019, 90 (07): : 733 - 739
  • [45] Epidemiology of reading disability: A comparison of DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria
    Di Folco, Cecile
    Guez, Ava
    Peyre, Hugo
    Ramus, Franck
    SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2022, 26 (04) : 337 - 355
  • [46] Between Scylla and Charybdis: DSM-5/ICD-11 and RDoC in neuropsychiatry?
    Looi, Jeffrey C. L.
    Liberg, Benny
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 49 (01): : 82 - 83
  • [47] DSM-5 and ICD-11 on personality disorder: A lawyer's perspective
    Bartlett, Peter
    PERSONALITY AND MENTAL HEALTH, 2011, 5 (02) : 144 - 151
  • [48] Expanding the definition of addiction: DSM-5 vs. ICD-11
    Grant, Jon E.
    Chamberlain, Samuel R.
    CNS SPECTRUMS, 2016, 21 (04) : 300 - 303
  • [49] Obsessive compulsive and related disorders: comparing DSM-5 and ICD-11
    Marras, Anna
    Fineberg, Naomi
    Pallanti, Stefano
    CNS SPECTRUMS, 2016, 21 (04) : 324 - 333
  • [50] Reliability and validity of the DSM-IV-TR and proposed DSM-5 criteria for pedophilia: Implications for the ICD-11 and the next DSM
    Seto, Michael C.
    Fedoroff, J. Paul
    Bradford, John M.
    Knack, Natasha
    Rodrigues, Nicole C.
    Curry, Susan
    Booth, Brad
    Gray, Jonathan
    Cameron, Colin
    Bourget, Dominique
    Messina, Sarina
    James, Elizabeth
    Watson, Diane
    Gulati, Sanjiv
    Balmaceda, Rufino
    Ahmed, Adekunle G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 49 : 98 - 106