Amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:15
|
作者
Lv, Yan [1 ]
Zou, Zui [3 ]
Chen, Guan-min [4 ]
Jia, Huai-Xin [2 ]
Zhong, Jing [1 ]
Fang, Wei-Wu [1 ]
机构
[1] Mil Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Beijing, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
amlodipine; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; antihypertensive agents; CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER; BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL; DOUBLE-BLIND; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; PUBLICATION BIAS; ACTIVE TREATMENT; THERAPY; BENAZEPRIL; PLACEBO; NIFEDIPINE;
D O I
10.1097/MBP.0b013e32833a23d4
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to estimate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as compared with amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension. Methods The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase were searched for relevant articles. A random effect model of meta-analysis was used for the selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results A total of 17 randomized controlled trials involving 3291 patients were identified using predefined criteria. The combination treatment of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors resulted in a greater reduction of both systolic blood pressure (SBP) [weighted mean difference (WMD) 5.72, 95% CI: (confidence interval) 4.10-7.33] and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD 3.62, 95% CI: 4.85-2.39) than monotherapy. The combination treatment also generated significantly greater reductions for the mean ambulatory SBP and DBP during the full 24 hours (WMD: SBP 4.24, 95% CI: 6.82-1.67; DBP 2.23, 95% CI: 3.73-0.69), but not for the trough (WMD: SBP 4.52, 9.56 to -0.51; DBP 3.7, 7.65 to -0.25). The hypertension therapeutic control (SPB < 140, DBP < 90 mmHg) rate for the combination treatment is higher than that for monotherapy [relative risk (RR): 1.36, 95% CI: 1.07-1.73]. The combination treatment also resulted in a lower overall rate of adverse events (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.99) and edema (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.29-0.56), but a higher rate of cough (RR: 3.28, 95% CI: 2.03-5.29) as compared with monotherapy. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that the combination treatment provides superior BP control, fewer adverse events, and better tolerability in hypertensive patients than monotherapy. Further research should explore the mechanism of the combination therapy and whether it is associated with the reduction of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Blood Press Monit 15: 195-204 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 204
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chenhui Tai
    Tianyi Gan
    Liling Zou
    Yuxi Sun
    Yi Zhang
    Wei Chen
    Jue Li
    Jian Zhang
    Yawei Xu
    Huihe Lu
    Dachun Xu
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 17
  • [32] Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tai, Chenhui
    Gan, Tianyi
    Zou, Liling
    Sun, Yuxi
    Zhang, Yi
    Chen, Wei
    Li, Jue
    Zhang, Jian
    Xu, Yawei
    Lu, Huihe
    Xu, Dachun
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2017, 17
  • [33] Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers are beneficial in normotensive atherosclerotic patients: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials
    McAlister, Finlay A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (04) : 505 - 514
  • [34] Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers for prevention of type 2 diabetes - A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Abuissa, H
    Jones, PG
    Marso, SP
    O'Keefe, JH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (05) : 821 - 826
  • [35] Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers and Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials
    Tocci, Giuliano
    Paneni, Francesco
    Palano, Francesca
    Sciarretta, Sebastiano
    Ferrucci, Andrea
    Kurtz, Theodore
    Mancia, Giuseppe
    Volpe, Massimo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2011, 24 (05) : 582 - 590
  • [36] Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease, a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Al-Mallah, M
    Tleyjeh, IM
    Abdel-Latif, A
    Weaver, WD
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (17) : U506 - U506
  • [37] A systematic review and meta-analysis of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use and psoriasis incidence
    Song, Gonjin
    Kim, Ji Yea
    Yoon, Ha Young
    Yee, Jeong
    Gwak, Hye Sun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [38] The Efficacy of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Post Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis
    Kotak, Sohny
    Hassan, Warda
    Mehmood, Marium
    Kumar, Umesh
    Sagreeka, Fnu
    Karishma, Fnu
    Kumari, Pirya
    Pirya, Fnu
    Saquib, Javeria
    Iqbal, Amna
    Khan, Anosh Aslam
    Varrassi, Giustino
    Khatri, Mahima
    Kumar, Satesh
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [39] A systematic review and meta-analysis of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use and psoriasis incidence
    Gonjin Song
    Ji Yea Kim
    Ha Young Yoon
    Jeong Yee
    Hye Sun Gwak
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [40] Monitoring Initial Response to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Based Regimens An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis From Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials
    Bell, Katy J. L.
    Hayen, Andrew
    Macaskill, Petra
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Neal, Bruce C.
    Fox, Kim M.
    Remme, Willem J.
    Asselbergs, Folkert W.
    van Gilst, Wiek H.
    MacMahon, Stephen
    Remuzzi, Giuseppe
    Ruggenenti, Piero
    Teo, Koon K.
    Irwig, Les
    HYPERTENSION, 2010, 56 (03) : 533 - U429