Amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:15
|
作者
Lv, Yan [1 ]
Zou, Zui [3 ]
Chen, Guan-min [4 ]
Jia, Huai-Xin [2 ]
Zhong, Jing [1 ]
Fang, Wei-Wu [1 ]
机构
[1] Mil Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Beijing, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
amlodipine; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; antihypertensive agents; CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER; BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL; DOUBLE-BLIND; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; PUBLICATION BIAS; ACTIVE TREATMENT; THERAPY; BENAZEPRIL; PLACEBO; NIFEDIPINE;
D O I
10.1097/MBP.0b013e32833a23d4
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to estimate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as compared with amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension. Methods The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase were searched for relevant articles. A random effect model of meta-analysis was used for the selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results A total of 17 randomized controlled trials involving 3291 patients were identified using predefined criteria. The combination treatment of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors resulted in a greater reduction of both systolic blood pressure (SBP) [weighted mean difference (WMD) 5.72, 95% CI: (confidence interval) 4.10-7.33] and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD 3.62, 95% CI: 4.85-2.39) than monotherapy. The combination treatment also generated significantly greater reductions for the mean ambulatory SBP and DBP during the full 24 hours (WMD: SBP 4.24, 95% CI: 6.82-1.67; DBP 2.23, 95% CI: 3.73-0.69), but not for the trough (WMD: SBP 4.52, 9.56 to -0.51; DBP 3.7, 7.65 to -0.25). The hypertension therapeutic control (SPB < 140, DBP < 90 mmHg) rate for the combination treatment is higher than that for monotherapy [relative risk (RR): 1.36, 95% CI: 1.07-1.73]. The combination treatment also resulted in a lower overall rate of adverse events (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.99) and edema (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.29-0.56), but a higher rate of cough (RR: 3.28, 95% CI: 2.03-5.29) as compared with monotherapy. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that the combination treatment provides superior BP control, fewer adverse events, and better tolerability in hypertensive patients than monotherapy. Further research should explore the mechanism of the combination therapy and whether it is associated with the reduction of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Blood Press Monit 15: 195-204 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 204
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Telmisartan versus angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Z Zou
    G-L Xi
    H-B Yuan
    Q-F Zhu
    X-Y Shi
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2009, 23 : 339 - 349
  • [22] MONOTHERAPY OF HYPERTENSION WITH ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITORS
    MATERSON, BJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 77 (4A): : 128 - 134
  • [23] ALISKIREN/AMLODIPINE VERSUS ALISKIREN/HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN HYPERTENSION: INDIRECT-COMPARISON META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Gao DengFeng
    Liu Yang
    Niu Xiaolin
    Yan Rui
    Meng Zhe
    HEART, 2013, 99 : E202 - E203
  • [24] Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of nondiabetic renal disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Giatras, I
    Lau, J
    Levey, AS
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (05) : 337 - +
  • [25] PREVENTION OF RECURRENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION WITH ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORS OR ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS
    Bhuriya, Rohit
    Bedi, Updesh
    Bahekar, Amol
    Molnar, Janos
    Singh, Mukesh
    Patel, Pawan
    Singh, Param Puneet
    Khosla, Sandeep
    Arora, Rohit
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10)
  • [26] Efficacy and Safety of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ananta, Muammar Emir
    Ivan, Ignatius
    Wijaya, Alya Darin
    Albab, Chabib Fachry
    Danny, Siska
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (16) : S23 - S24
  • [27] Angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphism and SLE: A meta-analysis
    Lee, Y
    Lee, YH
    Choi, SJ
    Rho, YH
    Ji, JD
    Song, GG
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 : 225 - 225
  • [28] Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and No Clinical Evidence of Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Vu Hoang
    Addison, Daniel
    Birnbaum, Yochai
    Alam, Mahboob
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [29] Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors Decrease the Risk of Cardiac Rupture after Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Li, Siyi
    Wang, Jinan
    Yan, Yan
    Gong, Wei
    Nie, Shaoping
    CARDIOVASCULAR INNOVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 8 (01)
  • [30] Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Patients ≥65 Years of Age
    Bavishi, Chirag
    Ahmed, Mohammed
    Trivedi, Vrinda
    Khan, Abdur Rahman
    Gongora, Carlos
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Messerli, Franz H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 118 (09): : 1427 - 1436