Spatially explicit population estimates for black bears based on cluster sampling

被引:31
|
作者
Humm, Jacob M. [1 ]
Mccown, J. Walter [2 ]
Scheick, Brian K. [2 ]
Clark, Joseph D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Forestry Wildlife & Fisheries, 274 Ellington Plant Sci Bldg, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, 1105 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL 32601 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Southern Appalachian Res Branch, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, US Geol Survey, 274 Ellington Plant Sci Bldg, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2017年 / 81卷 / 07期
关键词
abundance; black bear; clustered sampling; density; Florida; spatially explicit capture-recapture; Ursus americanus floridanus; CAPTURE; DENSITY; DNA; SIZE;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.21294
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We estimated abundance and density of the 5 major black bear (Ursus americanus) subpopulations (i.e., Eglin, Apalachicola, Osceola, Ocala-St. Johns, Big Cypress) in Florida, USA with spatially explicit capture-mark-recapture (SCR) by extracting DNA from hair samples collected at barbed-wire hair sampling sites. We employed a clustered sampling configuration with sampling sites arranged in 3x3 clusters spaced 2km apart within each cluster and cluster centers spaced 16km apart (center to center). We surveyed all 5 subpopulations encompassing 38,960km(2) during 2014 and 2015. Several landscape variables, most associated with forest cover, helped refine density estimates for the 5 subpopulations we sampled. Detection probabilities were affected by site-specific behavioral responses coupled with individual capture heterogeneity associated with sex. Model-averaged bear population estimates ranged from 120 (95% CI=59-276) bears or a mean 0.025 bears/km(2) (95% CI=0.011-0.44) for the Eglin subpopulation to 1,198 bears (95% CI=949-1,537) or 0.127 bears/km(2) (95% CI=0.101-0.163) for the Ocala-St. Johns subpopulation. The total population estimate for our 5 study areas was 3,916 bears (95% CI=2,914-5,451). The clustered sampling method coupled with information on land cover was efficient and allowed us to estimate abundance across extensive areas that would not have been possible otherwise. Clustered sampling combined with spatially explicit capture-recapture methods has the potential to provide rigorous population estimates for a wide array of species that are extensive and heterogeneous in their distribution. (c) 2017 The Wildlife Society. We estimated abundance and density of the 5 major black bear subpopulations in Florida with non-invasive spatially explicit capture-mark-recapture methods based on a clustered sampling configuration. Clustered sampling combined with spatially explicit capture-recapture methods have the potential to provide rigorous population estimates for a wide array of species that are extensive and heterogeneous in their distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1201
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimates of dispersal and home-range fidelity in American black bears
    Costello, Cecily M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2010, 91 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [42] Spatially explicit structure of natural stands dominated by black spruce
    Rossi, Sergio
    Morin, Hubert
    Gionest, Francois
    Laprise, Danielle
    [J]. SILVA FENNICA, 2013, 47 (03)
  • [43] DNA-Based Population Demographics of Black Bears in Coastal North Carolina and Virginia
    Tredick, Catherine A.
    Vaughan, Michael R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 73 (07): : 1031 - 1039
  • [44] SPRAT: A spatially-explicit marine ecosystem model based on population balance equations
    Johanson, Arne N.
    Oschlies, Andreas
    Hasselbring, Wilhelm
    Worm, Boris
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2017, 349 : 11 - 25
  • [45] Toward reliable population density estimates of partially marked populations using spatially explicit mark-resight methods
    Carter, Andrew
    Potts, Joanne M.
    Roshier, David A.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (04): : 2131 - 2141
  • [46] Improving vineyard sampling efficiency via dynamic spatially explicit optimisation
    Meyers, J. M.
    Sacks, G. L.
    Van Es, H. M.
    Vanden Heuvel, J. E.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GRAPE AND WINE RESEARCH, 2011, 17 (03) : 306 - 315
  • [47] Evaluating habitat as a surrogate for population viability using a spatially explicit population model
    Lawler, JJ
    Schumaker, NH
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, 94 (1-3) : 85 - 100
  • [48] Spatially explicit population dynamics in a declining population of the tropical rodent, Bolomys lasiurus
    Ghizoni, IR
    Layme, VMG
    Lima, AP
    Magnusson, WE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2005, 86 (04) : 677 - 682
  • [49] Evaluating Habitat as a Surrogate for Population Viability Using a Spatially Explicit Population Model
    Joshua J. Lawler
    Nathan H. Schumaker
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2004, 94 : 85 - 100
  • [50] Evaluating spatially explicit viability of a declining ruffed grouse population
    Blomberg, Erik J.
    Tefft, Brian C.
    Reed, J. Michael
    McWilliams, Scott R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 76 (03): : 503 - 513