Spatially explicit population estimates for black bears based on cluster sampling

被引:31
|
作者
Humm, Jacob M. [1 ]
Mccown, J. Walter [2 ]
Scheick, Brian K. [2 ]
Clark, Joseph D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Forestry Wildlife & Fisheries, 274 Ellington Plant Sci Bldg, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, 1105 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL 32601 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Southern Appalachian Res Branch, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, US Geol Survey, 274 Ellington Plant Sci Bldg, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2017年 / 81卷 / 07期
关键词
abundance; black bear; clustered sampling; density; Florida; spatially explicit capture-recapture; Ursus americanus floridanus; CAPTURE; DENSITY; DNA; SIZE;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.21294
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We estimated abundance and density of the 5 major black bear (Ursus americanus) subpopulations (i.e., Eglin, Apalachicola, Osceola, Ocala-St. Johns, Big Cypress) in Florida, USA with spatially explicit capture-mark-recapture (SCR) by extracting DNA from hair samples collected at barbed-wire hair sampling sites. We employed a clustered sampling configuration with sampling sites arranged in 3x3 clusters spaced 2km apart within each cluster and cluster centers spaced 16km apart (center to center). We surveyed all 5 subpopulations encompassing 38,960km(2) during 2014 and 2015. Several landscape variables, most associated with forest cover, helped refine density estimates for the 5 subpopulations we sampled. Detection probabilities were affected by site-specific behavioral responses coupled with individual capture heterogeneity associated with sex. Model-averaged bear population estimates ranged from 120 (95% CI=59-276) bears or a mean 0.025 bears/km(2) (95% CI=0.011-0.44) for the Eglin subpopulation to 1,198 bears (95% CI=949-1,537) or 0.127 bears/km(2) (95% CI=0.101-0.163) for the Ocala-St. Johns subpopulation. The total population estimate for our 5 study areas was 3,916 bears (95% CI=2,914-5,451). The clustered sampling method coupled with information on land cover was efficient and allowed us to estimate abundance across extensive areas that would not have been possible otherwise. Clustered sampling combined with spatially explicit capture-recapture methods has the potential to provide rigorous population estimates for a wide array of species that are extensive and heterogeneous in their distribution. (c) 2017 The Wildlife Society. We estimated abundance and density of the 5 major black bear subpopulations in Florida with non-invasive spatially explicit capture-mark-recapture methods based on a clustered sampling configuration. Clustered sampling combined with spatially explicit capture-recapture methods have the potential to provide rigorous population estimates for a wide array of species that are extensive and heterogeneous in their distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1201
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A spatially explicit hierarchical model to characterize population viability
    Campbell, Steven P.
    Zylstra, Erin R.
    Darst, Catherine R.
    Averill-Murray, Roy C.
    Steidl, Robert J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2018, 28 (08) : 2055 - 2065
  • [32] Spatially explicit downscaling and projection of population in mainland China
    Xu, Wenru
    Zhou, Yuyu
    Taubenbock, Hannes
    Stokes, Eleanor C.
    Zhu, Zhengyuan
    Lai, Feilin
    Li, Xuecao
    Zhao, Xia
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 941
  • [33] Spatially explicit Bayesian clustering models in population genetics
    Francois, Olivier
    Durand, Eric
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2010, 10 (05) : 773 - 784
  • [34] Development and application of a spatially explicit moose population model
    McKenney, DW
    Rempel, RS
    Venier, LA
    Wang, YH
    Bisset, AR
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1998, 76 (10): : 1922 - 1931
  • [35] Error propagation in spatially explicit population models: a reassessment
    Mooij, WM
    DeAngelis, DL
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) : 930 - 933
  • [36] POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS OF BLACK BEARS IN WEST CENTRAL IDAHO
    BEECHAM, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1983, 47 (02): : 405 - 412
  • [37] Spatially-explicit population models with complex decisions
    Goodwin, R. A.
    Pandey, V.
    Kiker, G. A.
    Kim, J. B.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY IN HARBORS AND COASTAL AREAS: MANAGEMENT USING COMPARATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2007, : 293 - +
  • [38] Demographic Rates and Population Viability of Black Bears in Louisiana
    Laufenberg, Jared S.
    Clark, Joseph D.
    Hooker, Michael J.
    Lowe, Carrie L.
    O'Connell-Goode, Kaitlin C.
    Troxler, Jesse C.
    Davidson, Maria M.
    Chamberlain, Michael J.
    Chandler, Richard B.
    [J]. WILDLIFE MONOGRAPHS, 2016, 194 (01) : 1 - 37
  • [39] Population genetics of American black bears in Georgia, USA
    Hooker, Michael J.
    Bond, Bobby T.
    Chamberlain, Michael J.
    [J]. URSUS, 2019, 29 (02) : 134 - 146
  • [40] Sources and sinks of greenhouse gases in the landscape: Approach for spatially explicit estimates
    Holmberg, Maria
    Akujarvi, Anu
    Anttila, Saku
    Autio, Iida
    Haakana, Markus
    Junttila, Virpi
    Karvosenoja, Niko
    Kortelainen, Pirkko
    Makela, Annikki
    Minkkinen, Kari
    Minunno, Francesco
    Rankinen, Katri
    Ojanen, Paavo
    Paunu, Ville-Veikko
    Peltoniemi, Mikko
    Rasilo, Terhi
    Sallantaus, Tapani
    Savolahti, Mikko
    Tuominen, Sakari
    Tuominen, Seppo
    Vanhala, Pekka
    Forsius, Martin
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 781