Spatially explicit population estimates for black bears based on cluster sampling

被引:31
|
作者
Humm, Jacob M. [1 ]
Mccown, J. Walter [2 ]
Scheick, Brian K. [2 ]
Clark, Joseph D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Forestry Wildlife & Fisheries, 274 Ellington Plant Sci Bldg, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, 1105 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL 32601 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Southern Appalachian Res Branch, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, US Geol Survey, 274 Ellington Plant Sci Bldg, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2017年 / 81卷 / 07期
关键词
abundance; black bear; clustered sampling; density; Florida; spatially explicit capture-recapture; Ursus americanus floridanus; CAPTURE; DENSITY; DNA; SIZE;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.21294
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We estimated abundance and density of the 5 major black bear (Ursus americanus) subpopulations (i.e., Eglin, Apalachicola, Osceola, Ocala-St. Johns, Big Cypress) in Florida, USA with spatially explicit capture-mark-recapture (SCR) by extracting DNA from hair samples collected at barbed-wire hair sampling sites. We employed a clustered sampling configuration with sampling sites arranged in 3x3 clusters spaced 2km apart within each cluster and cluster centers spaced 16km apart (center to center). We surveyed all 5 subpopulations encompassing 38,960km(2) during 2014 and 2015. Several landscape variables, most associated with forest cover, helped refine density estimates for the 5 subpopulations we sampled. Detection probabilities were affected by site-specific behavioral responses coupled with individual capture heterogeneity associated with sex. Model-averaged bear population estimates ranged from 120 (95% CI=59-276) bears or a mean 0.025 bears/km(2) (95% CI=0.011-0.44) for the Eglin subpopulation to 1,198 bears (95% CI=949-1,537) or 0.127 bears/km(2) (95% CI=0.101-0.163) for the Ocala-St. Johns subpopulation. The total population estimate for our 5 study areas was 3,916 bears (95% CI=2,914-5,451). The clustered sampling method coupled with information on land cover was efficient and allowed us to estimate abundance across extensive areas that would not have been possible otherwise. Clustered sampling combined with spatially explicit capture-recapture methods has the potential to provide rigorous population estimates for a wide array of species that are extensive and heterogeneous in their distribution. (c) 2017 The Wildlife Society. We estimated abundance and density of the 5 major black bear subpopulations in Florida with non-invasive spatially explicit capture-mark-recapture methods based on a clustered sampling configuration. Clustered sampling combined with spatially explicit capture-recapture methods have the potential to provide rigorous population estimates for a wide array of species that are extensive and heterogeneous in their distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1201
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the sampling design of spatially explicit integrated population models
    Zhao, Qing
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 11 (10): : 1207 - 1220
  • [2] Counting Cats: Spatially Explicit Population Estimates of Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) Using Unstructured Sampling Data
    Broekhuis, Femke
    Gopalaswamy, Arjun M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (05):
  • [3] Expansion of Brown Bears (Ursus arctos) into the Eastern Alps: A Spatially Explicit Population Model
    Thorsten Wiegand
    Felix Knauer
    Petra Kaczensky
    Javier Naves
    [J]. Biodiversity & Conservation, 2004, 13 : 79 - 114
  • [4] Expansion of brown bears (Ursus arctos) into the eastern Alps:: a spatially explicit population model
    Wiegand, T
    Knauer, F
    Kaczensky, P
    Naves, J
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2004, 13 (01) : 79 - 114
  • [5] Improving removal-based estimates of abundance by sampling a population of spatially distinct subpopulations
    Dorazio, RM
    Jelks, HL
    Jordan, F
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (04) : 1093 - 1101
  • [6] Comparing clustered sampling designs for spatially explicit estimation of population density
    Clark, Joseph D.
    [J]. POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2019, 61 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [7] Sampling design and bias in DNA-based capture-mark-recapture population and density estimates of grizzly bears
    Boulanger, J
    McLellan, BN
    Woods, JG
    Proctor, MF
    Strobeck, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2004, 68 (03): : 457 - 469
  • [8] Spatially explicit Bayesian hierarchical models improve estimates of avian population status and trends
    Smith, Adam C.
    Binley, Allison D.
    Daly, Lindsay
    Edwards, Brandon P. M.
    Ethier, Danielle
    Frei, Barbara
    Iles, David
    Meehan, Timothy D.
    Michel, Nicole L.
    Smith, Paul A.
    [J]. ORNITHOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2024, 126 (01)
  • [9] Differential vulnerability of black bears to trap and camera sampling and resulting biases in mark-recapture estimates
    Noyce, KV
    Garshelis, DL
    Coy, PL
    [J]. URSUS, VOL 12 (2001), 2001, 12 : 211 - 225
  • [10] SPATIALLY EXPLICIT POPULATION-MODELS
    PULLIAM, HR
    DUNNING, JB
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1995, 5 (01) : 2 - 2