Energy Conversion and Partition in the Asymmetric Reconnection Diffusion Region

被引:18
|
作者
Wang, Shan [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Li-Jen [1 ,2 ]
Bessho, Naoki [1 ,2 ]
Hesse, Michael [3 ,4 ]
Yoo, Jongsoo [5 ]
Yamada, Masaaki [5 ]
Liu, Yi-Hsin [6 ]
Gershman, Danial J. [2 ]
Giles, Barbara L. [2 ]
Moore, Thomas E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Astron Dept, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[3] Univ Bergen, Dept Phys & Technol, Bergen, Norway
[4] Southwest Res Inst San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Princeton Plasma Phys Lab, POB 451, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[6] Dartmouth Coll, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
COLLISIONLESS MAGNETIC RECONNECTION; EARTHS MAGNETOPAUSE DEPENDENCE; INFLOW ALFVEN SPEED; GUIDE-FIELD; ELECTRON ENERGIZATION; ION DIFFUSION; ACCELERATION; MMS; MECHANISM; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.1029/2018JA025519
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We investigate the energy conversion and partition in the asymmetric reconnection diffusion region using two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations and Magnetosphere Multiscale (MMS) mission observations. Under an upstream condition with equal temperatures in the two inflow regions, the simulation analysis indicates that the energy partition between ions and electrons depends on the distance from the X-line. Within the central electron diffusion region (EDR), nearly all dissipated electromagnetic field energies are converted to electrons. From the EDR to the ion diffusion region (IDR) scales, the rate of the electron energy gain decreases to be lower than that of ions. A magnetopause reconnection event inside the IDR observed by MMS shows comparable ion and electron energy gains, consistent with the simulation result in the transition region from EDR to IDR. At the EDR scale, the electron energization is mainly by the reconnection electric field (E-r); in-plane electric fields (E-xz) provide additional positive contributions near the X-line and do negative work on electrons beyond the EDR. The guide field reduces the electron energization by both E-r and E-xz in the EDR. For ion energization, E-r and E-xz have comparable contributions near the time of the peak reconnection rate, while E-xz dominants at later time. At the IDR scale, the guide field causes asymmetry in the amount of the energy gain and energization mechanisms between two exhausts but does not have significant effects on energy partition. Our study advances understanding of ion and electron energization in asymmetric reconnect IDRs.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:8185 / 8205
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reconnection in compressible plasmas: Extended conversion region
    Birn, J.
    Hesse, M.
    Zenitani, S.
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2011, 18 (11)
  • [22] Observation of Energy Conversion Near the X-line in Asymmetric Guide-field Reconnection
    Xu, J.
    Peng, F. Z.
    Russell, C. T.
    Giles, B.
    Lindqvist, P-A
    Torbert, R. B.
    Ergun, R. E.
    Burch, J. L.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2020, 895 (01)
  • [23] Particle-in-cell Simulation of Energy Conversion at the Turbulent Region Downstream of the Reconnection Front
    Yi, Yongyuan
    Pang, Y.
    Song, Liangjin
    Jin, Runqing
    Deng, Xiaohua
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 946 (02):
  • [24] The Effect of a Guide Field on Local Energy Conversion During Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection: MMS Observations
    Genestreti, K. J.
    Burch, J. L.
    Cassak, P. A.
    Torbert, R. B.
    Ergun, R. E.
    Varsani, A.
    Phan, T. D.
    Giles, B. L.
    Russell, C. T.
    Wang, S.
    Akhavan-Tafti, M.
    Allen, R. C.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2017, 122 (11) : 11342 - 11353
  • [25] Energy Partition of Thermal and Nonthermal Particles in Magnetic Reconnection
    Hoshino, Masahiro
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 946 (02):
  • [26] Energy Partition in Magnetic Reconnection in Earth's Magnetotail
    Eastwood, J. P.
    Phan, T. D.
    Drake, J. F.
    Shay, M. A.
    Borg, A. L.
    Lavraud, B.
    Taylor, M. G. G. T.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2013, 110 (22)
  • [27] Electron dynamics in the reconnection ion diffusion region
    Teh, W. -L.
    Nakamura, R.
    Fujimoto, M.
    Kronberg, E. A.
    Fazakerley, A. N.
    Daly, P. W.
    Baumjohann, W.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2012, 117
  • [28] Regimes of the Electron Diffusion Region in Magnetic Reconnection
    Le, A.
    Egedal, J.
    Ohia, O.
    Daughton, W.
    Karimabadi, H.
    Lukin, V. S.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2013, 110 (13)
  • [29] Mapping HF waves in the reconnection diffusion region
    Viberg, H.
    Khotyaintsev, Yu V.
    Vaivads, A.
    Andre, M.
    Pickett, J. S.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (06) : 1032 - 1037
  • [30] Localized Oscillatory Energy Conversion in Magnetopause Reconnection
    Burch, J. L.
    Ergun, R. E.
    Cassak, P. A.
    Webster, J. M.
    Torbert, R. B.
    Giles, B. L.
    Dorelli, J. C.
    Rager, A. C.
    Hwang, K. -J.
    Phan, T. D.
    Genestreti, K. J.
    Allen, R. C.
    Chen, L. -J.
    Wang, S.
    Gershman, D.
    Le Contel, O.
    Russell, C. T.
    Strangeway, R. J.
    Wilder, F. D.
    Graham, D. B.
    Hesse, M.
    Drake, J. F.
    Swisdak, M.
    Price, L. M.
    Shay, M. A.
    Lindqvist, P. -A.
    Pollock, C. J.
    Denton, R. E.
    Newman, D. L.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (03) : 1237 - 1245