The influence of detector size relative to field size in small-field photon-beam dosimetry using synthetic diamond crystals as sensors

被引:6
|
作者
Ade, N.
Nam, T. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Phys, Radiat & Hlth Phys Unit, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Synthetic diamonds; Small fields; Output factor; Detector size; Volume effect; HIGH-ENERGY ELECTRON; DOSE-RATE DEPENDENCE; MONTE-CARLO CALCULATIONS; CVD-DIAMOND; OUTPUT FACTORS; RADIATION-THERAPY; X-RAY; DEFECTS; PROBE;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.04.005
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The choice of a detector for small-field dosimetry remains a challenge due to the size/volume effect of detectors in small fields. Aimed at selecting a suitable crystal type and detector size for small-field dosimetry, this study investigates the relationship between detector and field size by analysing output factors (0Fs) measured with a Diode E (reference detector), a Farmer chamber and synthetic diamond detectors of various types and sizes in the dosimetry of a 6 MV photon beam with small fields between 03 x 0.3 cm(2) and 10 x 10 cm(2). The examined diamond sensors included two HPHT samples (HP1 and HP2) and six polycrystalline CVD specimens of optical grade (OG) and detector grade (DG) qualities with sizes between 0.3 and 1.0 cm. Each diamond was encapsulated in a tissue-equivalent probe housing which can hold crystals of various dimensions up to 1.0 x 1.0 x 0.1 cm(3) and has different exposure geometries ('edge-on' and 'flat-on') for impinging radiation. The HPHT samples were found to show an overall better performance compared to the CVD crystals with the 'edge-on' orientation being a preferred geometry for OF measurement especially for very small fields. For instance, down to a 0.4 x 0.4 cm(2) field a maximum deviation of 1.9% was observed between the OFs measured with Diode E and HP2 in the 'edge-on' orientation compared to a 4.6% deviation in the 'flat-on' geometry. It was observed that for fields below 4 x 4 cm(2), the dose deviation between the OFs measured with the detectors and Diode E increase with increasing detector size. It was estimated from an established relationship between the dose deviation and the ratio of detector size to field size for the detectors that the dose deviation probably due to the volume averaging effect would be >3% when the detector size is >3/4 of the field size. A sensitivity value of 223 nC Gy(-1) mm(-3) was determined in a 0.5 x 0.5 cm(2) field with HP2 compared to a value of 159.2 nC Gy(-1) mm(-3) obtained with the diode. The results of this study indicate that with careful selection of a suitable crystal type of a given size and orientation the relative dose measured with the diamond probe in small fields would agree favourably within +/- 2% with that measured with a small-field detector but with a higher sensitivity value. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 13
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The practical application of scintillation dosimetry in small-field photon-beam radiotherapy
    Burke, Elisa
    Poppinga, Daniela
    Schoenfeld, Andreas A.
    Harder, Dietrich
    Poppe, Bjoern
    Looe, Hui Khee
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2017, 27 (04): : 324 - 333
  • [2] Characterization of a microSilicon diode detector for small-field photon beam dosimetry
    Akino, Yuichi
    Fujiwara, Masateru
    Okamura, Keita
    Shiomi, Hiroya
    Mizuno, Hirokazu
    Isohashi, Fumiaki
    Suzuki, Osamu
    Seo, Yuji
    Tamari, Keisuke
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2020, 61 (03) : 410 - 418
  • [3] INFLUENCE OF DETECTOR SIZE IN PHOTON-BEAM PROFILE MEASUREMENTS
    SIBATA, CH
    MOTA, HC
    BEDDAR, AS
    HIGGINS, PD
    SHIN, KH
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 36 (05): : 621 - 631
  • [4] The 'cutting away' of potential secondary electron tracks explains the effects of beam size and detector wall density in small-field photon dosimetry
    Looe, Hui Khee
    Delfs, Bjoern
    Poppinga, Daniela
    Jiang, Ping
    Harder, Dietrich
    Poppe, Bjoern
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (01):
  • [5] DECONVOLUTION OF DETECTOR SIZE EFFECT FOR SMALL-FIELD MEASUREMENT
    HIGGINS, PD
    SIBATA, CH
    SISKIND, L
    SOHN, JW
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (10) : 1663 - 1666
  • [6] Energy and field size dependence of a silicon diode designed for small-field dosimetry
    Yarahmadi, Mehran
    Wegener, Sonja
    Sauer, Otto A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (05) : 1958 - 1964
  • [7] An overview on small-field dosimetry in photon beam radiotherapy: Developments and challenges
    Bagheri, Hamed
    Soleimani, Azadeh
    Gharehaghaji, Nahideh
    Mesbahi, Asghar
    Manouchehri, Farhad
    Shekarchi, Babak
    Dormanesh, Banafsheh
    Dadgar, Habib Alah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 13 (02) : 175 - 185
  • [8] On Monolithic Silicon Array Detectors for Small-Field Photon Beam Dosimetry
    Biasi, Giordano
    Davis, Jeremy
    Petasecca, Marco
    Guatelli, Susanna
    Perevertaylo, Vladimir
    Kron, Tomas
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2018, 65 (09) : 2640 - 2649
  • [9] Evaluation of effective field size characteristics for small megavoltage photon beam dosimetry
    Keivan, H.
    Maskani, R.
    Shahbazi-Gahrouei, D.
    Shanei, A.
    Pandesh, S.
    Sereshke, E. Tarighati
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2022, 20 (01): : 163 - 168
  • [10] Comparison of synthetic Diamond Detector TM 60019 with other PTW Small-field Detector with 6 MV Photon Energy
    Scherf, C.
    Henrich, N.
    Koehn, J.
    Bluemer, N.
    Heine, B.
    Loutfi-Krauss, B.
    Mielke, M.
    Zink, K.
    Ramm, U.
    Licher, J.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 : 93 - 93