Development of an Extreme Gradient Boosting Model Integrated With Evolutionary Algorithms for Hourly Water Level Prediction

被引:34
|
作者
Nguyen, Duc Hai [1 ,2 ]
Hien Le, Xuan [2 ]
Heo, Jae-Yeong [1 ]
Bae, Deg-Hyo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sejong Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 143747, South Korea
[2] Thuyloi Univ, Fac Water Resources Engn, Hanoi 116705, Vietnam
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2021年 / 9卷
关键词
Predictive models; Radio frequency; Floods; Machine learning algorithms; Genetic algorithms; Urban areas; Prediction algorithms; Extreme gradient boosting; evolutionary algorithms; water level prediction; tree-based model; urban floods; DIFFERENTIAL-EVOLUTION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; NEURAL-NETWORK; OPTIMIZATION; WAVELET; ANFIS; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3111287
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The establishment of reliable water level prediction models is vital for urban flood control and planning. In this paper, we develop hybrid models (GA-XGBoost and DE-XGBoost) that couple two evolutionary models, a genetic algorithm (GA) and a differential evolution (DE) algorithm, with the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model for hourly water level prediction. The Jungrang urban basin located on the Han River, South Korea, was selected as a case study for the proposed models. Hourly rainfall and water level data were collected between 2003 and 2020 to construct and evaluate the performance of the selected models. To compare the prediction efficiency, two other tree-based models were chosen: classification and registration tree (CART) and random forest (RF) models. A comparison of the results showed that two hybrid models, GA-XGBoost and DE-XGBoost, outperformed RF and CART in the multistep-ahead prediction of water level, and the relative errors of the hybrid model ranged from [2.18%-9.21%], compared to [3.76%-10.41%] and [2.99%-11.88%] for the RF and CART, respectively. Reliable performance was also supported by other measures. In general, the GA-XGBoost and DE-XGBoost models displayed relatively similar performance despite their small differences. The CART model was not preferable for multistep-ahead water level predictions, even though it yielded the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) value. This study verifies that despite having some drawbacks when considering long step-ahead prediction and model complexity, hybrid XGBoost models might be superior to many existing models for hourly water level prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:125853 / 125867
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction Model of Aluminized Layer Thickness Based on X-Ray Fluorescence and Extreme Gradient Boosting
    Li Zhuoyue
    Wang Cheng
    Li Qiuliang
    Guo Zhenping
    Li Bin
    Li Xin
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2022, 59 (21)
  • [32] A Promising Preoperative Prediction Model for Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on an Extreme Gradient Boosting Algorithm
    Liu, Weiwei
    Zhang, Lifan
    Xin, Zhaodan
    Zhang, Haili
    You, Liting
    Bai, Ling
    Zhou, Juan
    Ying, Binwu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [33] Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression Model for Soil Available Boron
    F. Gökmen
    V. Uygur
    E. Sukuşu
    Eurasian Soil Science, 2023, 56 : 738 - 746
  • [34] A boosting ensemble learning based hybrid light gradient boosting machine and extreme gradient boosting model for predicting house prices
    Sibindi, Racheal
    Mwangi, Ronald Waweru
    Waititu, Anthony Gichuhi
    ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2023, 5 (04)
  • [35] Drought Forecasting Using Integrated Variational Mode Decomposition and Extreme Gradient Boosting
    Ekmekcioglu, Oemer
    WATER, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [36] An integrated evolutionary model development
    Savkovic-Stevanovic, J
    SIMULATION AND MODELLING: ENABLERS FOR A BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE, 2000, : 114 - 116
  • [37] Cryptocurrency Price Prediction Using Enhanced PSO with Extreme Gradient Boosting Algorithm
    Srivastava, Vibha
    Dwivedi, Vijay Kumar
    Singh, Ashutosh Kumar
    CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 23 (02) : 170 - 187
  • [38] An extreme gradient boosting technique to estimate TBM penetration rate and prediction platform
    Wang, Yaxu
    Gao, Xuechi
    Jiang, Peng
    Guo, Xu
    Wang, Ruirui
    Guan, Zengda
    Chen, Lei
    Xu, Chenxing
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 81 (01)
  • [39] Decoy selection for protein structure prediction via extreme gradient boosting and ranking
    Nasrin Akhter
    Gopinath Chennupati
    Hristo Djidjev
    Amarda Shehu
    BMC Bioinformatics, 21
  • [40] EGBMMDA: Extreme Gradient Boosting Machine for MiRNA-Disease Association prediction
    Xing Chen
    Li Huang
    Di Xie
    Qi Zhao
    Cell Death & Disease, 9