Development of an Extreme Gradient Boosting Model Integrated With Evolutionary Algorithms for Hourly Water Level Prediction

被引:34
|
作者
Nguyen, Duc Hai [1 ,2 ]
Hien Le, Xuan [2 ]
Heo, Jae-Yeong [1 ]
Bae, Deg-Hyo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sejong Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 143747, South Korea
[2] Thuyloi Univ, Fac Water Resources Engn, Hanoi 116705, Vietnam
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2021年 / 9卷
关键词
Predictive models; Radio frequency; Floods; Machine learning algorithms; Genetic algorithms; Urban areas; Prediction algorithms; Extreme gradient boosting; evolutionary algorithms; water level prediction; tree-based model; urban floods; DIFFERENTIAL-EVOLUTION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; NEURAL-NETWORK; OPTIMIZATION; WAVELET; ANFIS; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3111287
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The establishment of reliable water level prediction models is vital for urban flood control and planning. In this paper, we develop hybrid models (GA-XGBoost and DE-XGBoost) that couple two evolutionary models, a genetic algorithm (GA) and a differential evolution (DE) algorithm, with the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model for hourly water level prediction. The Jungrang urban basin located on the Han River, South Korea, was selected as a case study for the proposed models. Hourly rainfall and water level data were collected between 2003 and 2020 to construct and evaluate the performance of the selected models. To compare the prediction efficiency, two other tree-based models were chosen: classification and registration tree (CART) and random forest (RF) models. A comparison of the results showed that two hybrid models, GA-XGBoost and DE-XGBoost, outperformed RF and CART in the multistep-ahead prediction of water level, and the relative errors of the hybrid model ranged from [2.18%-9.21%], compared to [3.76%-10.41%] and [2.99%-11.88%] for the RF and CART, respectively. Reliable performance was also supported by other measures. In general, the GA-XGBoost and DE-XGBoost models displayed relatively similar performance despite their small differences. The CART model was not preferable for multistep-ahead water level predictions, even though it yielded the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) value. This study verifies that despite having some drawbacks when considering long step-ahead prediction and model complexity, hybrid XGBoost models might be superior to many existing models for hourly water level prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:125853 / 125867
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of an interpretable extreme gradient boosting model and an artificial neural network model for prediction of severe acute pancreatitis
    Lu, Yajing
    Qiu, Minhao
    Pan, Shuang
    Basharat, Zarrin
    Zippi, Maddalena
    Fiorino, Sirio
    Hong, Wandong
    POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ, 2024, 134 (05):
  • [22] Boosting algorithms: Regularization, prediction and model fitting
    Buehlmann, Peter
    Hothorn, Torsten
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 22 (04) : 477 - 505
  • [23] Hourly Particulate Matter (PM10) Concentration Forecast in Germany Using Extreme Gradient Boosting
    Wallek, Stefan
    Langner, Marcel
    Schubert, Sebastian
    Franke, Raphael
    Sauter, Tobias
    ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (05)
  • [24] Towards an improved prediction of soil-freezing characteristic curve based on extreme gradient boosting model
    Li, Kai-Qi
    He, Hai-Long
    GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2024, 15 (06)
  • [25] Traffic Incident Clearance Time Prediction and Influencing Factor Analysis Using Extreme Gradient Boosting Model
    Tang, Jinjun
    Zheng, Lanlan
    Han, Chunyang
    Liu, Fang
    Cai, Jianming
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2020, 2020
  • [26] Traffic Incident Clearance Time Prediction and Influencing Factor Analysis Using Extreme Gradient Boosting Model
    Tang, Jinjun
    Zheng, Lanlan
    Han, Chunyang
    Liu, Fang
    Cai, Jianming
    Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, 2020
  • [27] Research on prediction of PPV in open pit mine used on intelligent hybrid model of extreme gradient boosting
    Gu, Zhongyuan
    Xiong, Xin
    Yang, Chengye
    Cao, Miaocong
    Xu, Chun
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 371
  • [28] Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression Model for Soil Available Boron
    Gokmen, F.
    Uygur, V.
    Sukusu, E.
    EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2023, 56 (06) : 738 - 746
  • [29] EXTREME GRADIENT BOOSTING REGRESSION MODEL FOR SOIL THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY
    Yurttakal, Ahmet Hasim
    THERMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 25 : S1 - S7
  • [30] A Self-Care Prediction Model for Children with Disability Based on Genetic Algorithm and Extreme Gradient Boosting
    Syafrudin, Muhammad
    Alfian, Ganjar
    Fitriyani, Norma Latif
    Anshari, Muhammad
    Hadibarata, Tony
    Fatwanto, Agung
    Rhee, Jongtae
    MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (09)