An evaluation of calculation parameters in the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo codes and their effect on surface dose calculation

被引:15
|
作者
Kim, Jung-Ha [1 ]
Hill, Robin [1 ,2 ]
Kuncic, Zdenka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, Inst Med Phys, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2012年 / 57卷 / 14期
关键词
ION-CHAMBER RESPONSE; ENERGY-DEPENDENCE; BREAST-CANCER; CALCULATION ALGORITHMS; ELECTRON-TRANSPORT; PHOTON; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; DOSIMETRY; FILM;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/57/14/N267
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The Monte Carlo (MC) method has proven invaluable for radiation transport simulations to accurately determine radiation doses and is widely considered a reliable computational measure that can substitute a physical experiment where direct measurements are not possible or feasible. In the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc MC codes, there are several user-specified parameters and customized transport algorithms, which may affect the calculation results. In order to fully utilize the MC methods available in these codes, it is essential to understand all these options and to use them appropriately. In this study, the effects of the electron transport algorithms in EGSnrc/BEAMnrc, which are often a trade-off between calculation accuracy and efficiency, were investigated in the buildup region of a homogeneous water phantom and also in a heterogeneous phantom using the DOSRZnrc user code. The algorithms and parameters investigated include: boundary crossing algorithm (BCA), skin depth, electron step algorithm (ESA), global electron cutoff energy (ECUT) and electron production cutoff energy (AE). The variations in calculated buildup doses were found to be larger than 10% for different user-specified transport parameters. We found that using BCA = EXACT gave the best results in terms of accuracy and efficiency in calculating buildup doses using DOSRZnrc. In addition, using the ESA = PRESTA-I option was found to be the best way of reducing the total calculation time without losing accuracy in the results at high energies (few keV similar to MeV). We also found that although choosing a higher ECUT/AE value in the beam modelling can dramatically improve computation efficiency, there is a significant trade-off in surface dose uncertainty. Our study demonstrates that a careful choice of user-specified transport parameters is required when conducting similar MC calculations.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:N267 / N278
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Monte Carlo dose calculation in modern day radiotherapy
    Kueng, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S2 - S2
  • [32] Macro Monte Carlo for dose calculation of proton beams
    Fix, Michael K.
    Frei, Daniel
    Volken, Werner
    Born, Ernst J.
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    Manser, Peter
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (07): : 2027 - 2044
  • [33] Electron beam commissioning for Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Deng, J
    Jiang, SB
    Pawlicki, T
    Li, JS
    Ma, CM
    USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, 2000, : 431 - 433
  • [34] Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm on a distributed system
    Chauvie, S
    Dominoni, M
    Marini, P
    Stasi, M
    Pia, MG
    Scielzo, G
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B-PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTS, 2003, 125 : 159 - 163
  • [35] Monte carlo dose calculation in dental amalgam phantom
    Aziz, Mohd. Zahri Abdul
    Yusoff, A. L.
    Osman, N. D.
    Abdullah, R.
    Rabaie, N. A.
    Salikin, M. S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 40 (03) : 150 - 155
  • [36] A comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation denoising techniques
    El Naqa, I
    Kawrakow, I
    Fippel, M
    Siebers, JV
    Lindsay, PE
    Wickerhauser, MV
    Vicic, M
    Zakarian, K
    Kauffmann, N
    Deasy, JO
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05): : 909 - 922
  • [37] Clinical implementation of proton Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Paganetti, H
    Jiang, H
    Kollipara, S
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2028 - 2028
  • [38] Feasibility of an Independent Dose Calculation for VMAT with Monte Carlo
    Quino, L. Vazquez
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [39] MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF ABSORBED DOSE IN XEROMAMMOGRAPHY
    DANCE, DR
    BAKER, AM
    DAVIS, R
    STACEY, AJ
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1980, 25 (04): : 760 - 760
  • [40] 4D Monte Carlo Simulations of Beam and Patient Motion Using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc
    Heath, E.
    Badragan, I.
    Popescu, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3921 - 3921