Comparing the quality of oral anticoagulant management by anticoagulation clinics and by family physicians: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Wilson, SJA
Wells, PS
Kovacs, MJ
Lewis, GM
Martin, J
Burton, E
Anderson, DR
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth 2 Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pharm Victoria Gen, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
[2] Queen Elizabeth 2 Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Dept Pharm, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Ottawa Gen Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[7] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med, London, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Pharm, London, ON, Canada
[9] London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is growing evidence that better outcomes are achieved when anticoagulation is managed by anticoagulation clinics rather than by family physicians. We carried out a randomized controlled trial to evaluate these 2 models of anticoagulant care. Methods: We randomly allocated patients who were expected to require warfarin sodium for 3 months either to anticoagulation clinics located in 3 Canadian tertiary hospitals or to their family physician practices. We evaluated the quality of oral anticoagulant management by comparing the proportion of time that the international normalized ratio (INR) of patients receiving warfarin sodium was within the target therapeutic range +/- 0.2 INR units (expanded therapeutic range) while they were managed in anticoagulation clinics as opposed to family physicians' care over 3 months. We measured the rates of thromboembolic and major hemorrhagic events and patient satisfaction in the 2 groups. Results: Of the 221 patients enrolled, 112 were randomly assigned to anticoagulation clinics and 109 to family physicians. The INR values of patients who were managed by anticoagulation clinics were within the expanded therapeutic range 82% of the time versus 76% of the time for those managed by family physicians (p = 0.034). High-risk INR values (defined as being < 1.5 or > 5.0) were more commonly observed in patients managed by family physicians (40%) than in patients managed by anticoagulation clinics (30%, p = 0.005). More INR measurements were performed by family physicians than by anticoagulation clinics (13 v. 11, p = 0.001). Major bleeding events (2 [2%]) v. 1 [1%]), thromboembolic events 0 [1%] v. 2 [2%]) and deaths (5 [4%] v. 6 [6%]) occurred at a similar frequency in the anticoagulation clinic and family physician groups respectively. Of the 170 (77%) patients who completed the patient satisfaction questionnaire, more were satisfied when their anticoagulant management was managed through anticoagulation clinics than by their family physicians (p = 0.001). Interpretation: Anticoagulation clinics provided better oral anticoagulant management than family physicians, but the differences were relatively modest.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A randomised controlled trial of patient self management of oral anticoagulation treatment compared with primary care management
    Fitzmaurice, DA
    Murray, ET
    Gee, KM
    Allan, TF
    Hobbs, FDR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (11) : 845 - 849
  • [42] Anticoagulant treatment in German family practices – screening results from a cluster randomized controlled trial
    Lisa-R Ulrich
    Karola Mergenthal
    Juliana J Petersen
    Ina Roehl
    Sandra Rauck
    Birgit Kemperdick
    Sylvia Schulz-Rothe
    Andrea Berghold
    Andrea Siebenhofer
    BMC Family Practice, 15
  • [43] Quality of life outcome in a randomized controlled trial of case management
    Huxley, P
    Evans, S
    Burns, T
    Fahy, T
    Green, J
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 36 (05) : 249 - 255
  • [44] Quality of life outcome in a randomized controlled trial of case management
    Peter Huxley
    Sherrill Evans
    Tom Burns
    Tom Fahy
    John Green
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2001, 36 : 249 - 255
  • [45] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Management of Incomplete Abortion with Oral 600 mg Misoprostol with Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA)
    Madhual, Niramaya
    Tiwari, Heena Dixit
    Das, Susmita
    Kamboj, Saloni
    Thakkar, Smit
    Kashif, Hala
    Mahajan, Akriti
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S290 - S292
  • [46] Management of patients on long-term oral anticoagulant therapy undergoing elective surgery: survey of the clinical practice in the Italian anticoagulation clinics
    F. Baudo
    F. de Cataldo
    G. Mostarda
    A. Ghirarduzzi
    M. Molinatti
    V. Pengo
    D. Poli
    A. Tosetto
    E. Tiraferri
    E. Morra
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2007, 2 : 280 - 284
  • [47] Management of patients on long-term oral anticoagulant therapy undergoing elective surgery: survey of the clinical practice in the Italian anticoagulation clinics
    Baudo, F.
    de Cataldo, F.
    Mostarda, G.
    Ghirarduzzi, A.
    Molinatti, M.
    Pengo, V.
    Poli, D.
    Tosetto, A.
    Tiraferri, E.
    Morra, E.
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 2 (04) : 280 - 284
  • [48] Incomplete miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial comparing oral with vaginal misoprostol for medical evacuation
    Pang, MW
    Lee, TS
    Chung, TKH
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (11) : 2283 - 2287
  • [49] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Loss and Gain Incentives in Pediatric Weight Management
    Siegel, Robert
    Kist, Christopher
    Kharofa, Roohi
    Stackpole, Kristin
    Sammons, Amanda
    Dynan, Linda
    McGrady, Meghan
    Seo, JangDong
    Urbina, Elaine
    Kasparian, Nadine
    OBESITY, 2024, 32 : 285 - 286
  • [50] A randomized controlled trial comparing medical and expectant management of first trimester miscarriage
    Bagratee, JS
    Khullar, V
    Regan, L
    Moodley, J
    Kagoro, H
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (02) : 266 - 271