Comparing the quality of oral anticoagulant management by anticoagulation clinics and by family physicians: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Wilson, SJA
Wells, PS
Kovacs, MJ
Lewis, GM
Martin, J
Burton, E
Anderson, DR
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth 2 Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pharm Victoria Gen, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
[2] Queen Elizabeth 2 Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
[3] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Dept Pharm, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Ottawa Gen Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[7] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med, London, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Pharm, London, ON, Canada
[9] London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is growing evidence that better outcomes are achieved when anticoagulation is managed by anticoagulation clinics rather than by family physicians. We carried out a randomized controlled trial to evaluate these 2 models of anticoagulant care. Methods: We randomly allocated patients who were expected to require warfarin sodium for 3 months either to anticoagulation clinics located in 3 Canadian tertiary hospitals or to their family physician practices. We evaluated the quality of oral anticoagulant management by comparing the proportion of time that the international normalized ratio (INR) of patients receiving warfarin sodium was within the target therapeutic range +/- 0.2 INR units (expanded therapeutic range) while they were managed in anticoagulation clinics as opposed to family physicians' care over 3 months. We measured the rates of thromboembolic and major hemorrhagic events and patient satisfaction in the 2 groups. Results: Of the 221 patients enrolled, 112 were randomly assigned to anticoagulation clinics and 109 to family physicians. The INR values of patients who were managed by anticoagulation clinics were within the expanded therapeutic range 82% of the time versus 76% of the time for those managed by family physicians (p = 0.034). High-risk INR values (defined as being < 1.5 or > 5.0) were more commonly observed in patients managed by family physicians (40%) than in patients managed by anticoagulation clinics (30%, p = 0.005). More INR measurements were performed by family physicians than by anticoagulation clinics (13 v. 11, p = 0.001). Major bleeding events (2 [2%]) v. 1 [1%]), thromboembolic events 0 [1%] v. 2 [2%]) and deaths (5 [4%] v. 6 [6%]) occurred at a similar frequency in the anticoagulation clinic and family physician groups respectively. Of the 170 (77%) patients who completed the patient satisfaction questionnaire, more were satisfied when their anticoagulant management was managed through anticoagulation clinics than by their family physicians (p = 0.001). Interpretation: Anticoagulation clinics provided better oral anticoagulant management than family physicians, but the differences were relatively modest.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing the quality of oral anticoagulant management by anticoagulation clinics and by family physicians: a randomized controlled trial (vol 169, pg 293, 2003)
    Wilson, SJA
    Wells, PS
    Kovacs, MJ
    Lewis, GM
    Martin, J
    Burton, E
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 170 (04) : 451 - 451
  • [2] Comparison of the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy through patient self-management and management by specialized anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands - A randomized clinical trial
    Gadisseur, APA
    Breukink-Engbers, WGM
    van der Meer, FJM
    van den Besselaar, AMH
    Sturk, A
    Rosendaal, FR
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (21) : 2639 - 2646
  • [3] Comparing self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy with clinic management -: A randomized trial
    Menéndez-Jándula, B
    Souto, JC
    Oliver, A
    Montserrat, I
    Quintana, M
    Glch, I
    Bonfill, X
    Fontcuberta, J
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [4] Quality assurance for oral anticoagulation self management: a cluster randomized trial
    Murray, E. T.
    Jennings, I. .
    Kitchen, D.
    Kitchen, S. .
    Itzmaurice, D. A. F.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2008, 6 (03) : 464 - 469
  • [5] Improved control of oral anticoagulant dosing: a randomized controlled trial comparing two computer algorithms
    van Leeuwen, Y.
    Rombouts, E. K.
    Kruithof, C. J.
    van der Meer, F. J. M.
    Rosendaal, F. R.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2007, 5 (08) : 1644 - 1649
  • [6] Self-management versus conventional management of oral anticoagulant therapy: A randomized, controlled trial
    Christensen, Thomas D.
    Maegaard, Marianne
    Sorensen, Henrik T.
    Hjortdal, Vibeke E.
    Hasenkam, J. Michael
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 17 (04) : 260 - 266
  • [7] Patient self-management of oral anticoagulant care versus management by specialized anticoagulation clinics: Positive effects on quality of life.
    Gadisseur, APA
    Kaptein, AA
    Breukink-Engbers, MGM
    van der Meer, FJM
    Rosendaal, FR
    BLOOD, 2003, 102 (11) : 321A - 321A
  • [8] Patient self-management of oral anticoagulant care vs. management by specialized anticoagulation clinics: positive effects on quality of life
    Gadisseur, APA
    Kaptein, AA
    Breukink-Engbers, WGM
    Van Der Meer, FJM
    Rosendaal, FR
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2004, 2 (04) : 584 - 591
  • [9] Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral phytonadione for excessive anticoagulation
    Patel, RJ
    Witt, DM
    Saseen, JJ
    Tillman, DJ
    Wilkinson, DS
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2000, 20 (10): : 1159 - 1166
  • [10] Impact of pharmacists' training on oral anticoagulant counseling: A randomized controlled trial
    Showande, Segun J.
    Orok, Edidiong N.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (05) : 1253 - 1259