Comparing self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy with clinic management -: A randomized trial

被引:138
|
作者
Menéndez-Jándula, B
Souto, JC
Oliver, A
Montserrat, I
Quintana, M
Glch, I
Bonfill, X
Fontcuberta, J
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Unitat Hemostasia & Trombosi, Barcelona 08025, Spain
[2] Fdn Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: control of oral anticoagulant treatment has been reported to be suboptimal, but previous studies suggest that patient self-management improves control. Objective: To compare the quality of control and the clinical outcomes of oral anticoagulant treatment in self-managed patients versus patients following conventional management. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: University-affiliated hospital in Spain. Patients: 737 patients with indications for anticoagulant treatment. Intervention: The self-management group (n = 368) received simple instructions for using a portable coagulometer weekly and self-adjusting treatment dose. The conventional management group (n = 369) received usual care in an anticoagulation clinic (monthly measurement and control of international normalized ratio [INR], managed by hematologists). Measurements: Percentage of INR values within the target range and major related complications. Results: The median follow-up period was 11.8 months (range, 0.3 to 16.9 months). The unadjusted percentages of in-range INRs were 58.6% in the self-management group and 55.6% in the conventional management group (difference, 3.0 percentage points [95% CI, 0.4 to 5.4 percentage points]). Twenty-seven patients (7.3%) in the conventional management group and 8 (2.2%) in the self-management group had major complications related to anticoagulant treatment. The unadjusted risk difference for major complications between groups was 5.1 percentage points (exact 95% CI, 1.7 to 8.5 percentage points). Fewer patients had minor hemorrhages in the self-management group (14.9%) than in the conventional management group (36.4%). Fifteen patients (4.1%) in the conventional management group and 6 (1.6%) in the self-management group died (unadjusted risk difference, 2.5 percentage points [exact 95% CI, 0.0 to 5.1 percentage points]). Limitations: The trial was performed at only 1 center and was not blinded. The dropout rate in the intervention group was 21%. Conclusions: Compared with conventional management by an anticoagulation clinic, self-management of oral anticoagulant treatment achieved a similar level of control. Of note, major complications and minor hemorrhages were less common in the self-management group.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-management versus conventional management of oral anticoagulant therapy: A randomized, controlled trial
    Christensen, Thomas D.
    Maegaard, Marianne
    Sorensen, Henrik T.
    Hjortdal, Vibeke E.
    Hasenkam, J. Michael
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 17 (04) : 260 - 266
  • [2] Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy: A Review
    Thomas D. Christensen
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2004, 18 : 127 - 143
  • [3] Self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy: A review
    Christensen, TD
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2004, 18 (02) : 127 - 143
  • [4] Comparison of the quality of oral anticoagulant therapy through patient self-management and management by specialized anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands - A randomized clinical trial
    Gadisseur, APA
    Breukink-Engbers, WGM
    van der Meer, FJM
    van den Besselaar, AMH
    Sturk, A
    Rosendaal, FR
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (21) : 2639 - 2646
  • [5] Patient Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy: An International Update
    Alan K. Jacobson
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 1998, 5 (Suppl 1) : 25 - 28
  • [6] Self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy for mechanical heart valve patients
    Christensen, TD
    Attermann, J
    Pilegaard, HK
    Andersen, NT
    Maegaard, M
    Hasenkam, JM
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2001, 35 (02) : 107 - 113
  • [7] Clinical trial of an Internet-based system for supervised self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy.
    O'Shea, SI
    Arcasoy, MO
    Thames, EH
    Ortel, TL
    BLOOD, 2002, 100 (11) : 185A - 185A
  • [8] Self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Christensen, Thomas D.
    Johnsen, Soren P.
    Hjortdal, Vibeke E.
    Hasenkam, J. Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [9] A prospective controlled trial comparing weekly self testing and self dosing with the conventional management of patients on oral anticoagulant therapy
    Watzke, HH
    Forberg, E
    Svolba, G
    Jimenez-Boj, E
    Krinninger, B
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1999, : 219 - 219
  • [10] MANAGEMENT OF ORAL ANTICOAGULANT-THERAPY - EXPERIENCE WITH AN ANTICOAGULATION CLINIC
    ERRICHETTI, AM
    HOLDEN, A
    ANSELL, J
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1984, 144 (10) : 1966 - 1968