Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy with Automatic Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure versus Mini PCNL for the Treatment of 2-3-cm Kidney Stones in Patients with a Solitary Kidney

被引:16
|
作者
Deng, Xiaolin [1 ]
Xie, Donghua [1 ]
Huang, Xin [1 ]
Huang, Jianrong [1 ]
Song, Leming [1 ]
Du, Chuance [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Ganzhou Hosp, Ganzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Flexible ureteroscopy; Renal pelvic pressure; Kidney stone; Solitary kidney; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; LITHOTRIPSY; LARGER;
D O I
10.1159/000521373
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the treatment outcomes between suctioning flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy (SF-URL) with automatic control of renal pelvic pressure and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the management of 2-3-cm renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney. Materials and Methods: A total of 127 patients with a solitary kidney who underwent SF-URL (n = 57) or MPCNL (n = 70) for large renal stones (>2 cm) between June 2015 and October 2020 were consecutively analyzed. The stone characteristics, operative times, stone-free rate (SFR), hospital stays, and incidences of complications were compared. Results: There was a significantly shorter operative time with MPCNL than with SF-URL (43.4 +/- 18.9 min vs. 61.8 +/- 21.1 min, p = 0.012). SFR at 30 days were 80.7% (46/57) and 90.0% (63/70) for SF-URL and MPCNL, respectively (p > 0.05). The SFR at the 3-month follow-up was comparable in both groups (91.2% vs. 95.7%, p > 0.05). The hemoglobin decline value, hospital stay, serum cystatin C, and percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions in the SF-URL group were obviously better than those in the MPCNL group: (0.8 +/- 0.4) versus (3.9 +/- 2.7) g/dL (p = 0.007), (3.6 +/- 1.5) versus (6.9 +/- 3.1) days (p = 0.013), (1.02 +/- 0.48) versus (2.54 +/- 0.69) mg/L (p = 0.011), and 0 (0.0%) versus 7 (10.0%) (p = 0.016), respectively. The percentages of patients with thrombosis and perirenal hematoma in the MPCNL group were higher than those in the SF-URL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: For the treatment of 2-3-cm renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney, both SF-URL and MPCNL are effective. MPCNL has the advantage of a shorter operation time. However, SF-URL is characterized by less bleeding, shorter hospital stay, and less damage to kidney function.
引用
收藏
页码:1293 / 1297
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is one-stage f-URS without prior stenting really safe for solitary kidney patients with 1-3 cm renal stones?
    Li, Yuzhuo
    He, Qiqi
    RENAL FAILURE, 2021, 43 (01) : 617 - 618
  • [42] AMBULATORY TUBELESS MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (MINI-PCNL) VERSUS RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY (RIRS) IN TREATMENT OF 1-2 CM LOWER CALYCEAL RENAL STONES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY
    Elmansy, Hazem
    Fathy, Moustafa
    Hodhod, Amr
    Alaref, Amer
    Nikoufar, Parsa
    Zakaria, Ahmed S.
    Ahmad, Abdulrahman
    Hadi, Ruba Abdul
    Abbas, Loay
    Alaradi, Husain
    Shabana, Waleed
    Kotb, Ahmed
    Shahrour, Walid
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E818 - E818
  • [43] An easy risk stratification to recommend the optimal patients with 2–3 cm kidney stones to receive retrograde intrarenal surgery or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Zhijian Zhao
    Hongling Sun
    Tao Zeng
    Tuo Deng
    Yongda Liu
    Guohua Zeng
    Urolithiasis, 2020, 48 : 167 - 173
  • [44] Reply to 'Is one-stage f-URS without prior stenting really safe for solitary kidney patients with 1-3 cm renal stones?'
    Chen, Gang
    RENAL FAILURE, 2021, 43 (01) : 779 - 780
  • [45] An easy risk stratification to recommend the optimal patients with 2-3 cm kidney stones to receive retrograde intrarenal surgery or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Zhao, Zhijian
    Sun, Hongling
    Zeng, Tao
    Deng, Tuo
    Liu, Yongda
    Zeng, Guohua
    UROLITHIASIS, 2020, 48 (02) : 167 - 173
  • [46] Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Lower Calyceal Calculi of 2-3 cm in Patients With Solitary Kidney
    Zhang, Yu
    Wu, Yue
    Li, Jiuzhi
    Zhang, Guofei
    UROLOGY, 2018, 115 : 65 - 69
  • [47] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger than 2cm in Patients with a Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Kehua
    Zhang, Peng
    Xu, Bin
    Luo, Guangheng
    Hu, Jianxing
    Zhu, Jianguo
    Sun, Fa
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (05) : 442 - 448
  • [48] Re: An Easy Risk Stratification to Recommend the Optimal Patients with 2-3 cm Kidney Stones to Receive Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery or Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Assimos, Dean G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (01): : 26 - 27
  • [49] Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Lower Calyceal Calculi of 2-3 cm in Patients With Solitary Kidney - Reply
    Wu, Yue
    UROLOGY, 2018, 115 : 70 - 70
  • [50] Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Lower Calyceal Calculi of 2-3 cm in Patients With Solitary Kidney - Comment
    Deane, Leslie A.
    UROLOGY, 2018, 115 : 70 - 70