Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy with Automatic Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure versus Mini PCNL for the Treatment of 2-3-cm Kidney Stones in Patients with a Solitary Kidney

被引:16
|
作者
Deng, Xiaolin [1 ]
Xie, Donghua [1 ]
Huang, Xin [1 ]
Huang, Jianrong [1 ]
Song, Leming [1 ]
Du, Chuance [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Ganzhou Hosp, Ganzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Flexible ureteroscopy; Renal pelvic pressure; Kidney stone; Solitary kidney; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; LITHOTRIPSY; LARGER;
D O I
10.1159/000521373
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the treatment outcomes between suctioning flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy (SF-URL) with automatic control of renal pelvic pressure and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the management of 2-3-cm renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney. Materials and Methods: A total of 127 patients with a solitary kidney who underwent SF-URL (n = 57) or MPCNL (n = 70) for large renal stones (>2 cm) between June 2015 and October 2020 were consecutively analyzed. The stone characteristics, operative times, stone-free rate (SFR), hospital stays, and incidences of complications were compared. Results: There was a significantly shorter operative time with MPCNL than with SF-URL (43.4 +/- 18.9 min vs. 61.8 +/- 21.1 min, p = 0.012). SFR at 30 days were 80.7% (46/57) and 90.0% (63/70) for SF-URL and MPCNL, respectively (p > 0.05). The SFR at the 3-month follow-up was comparable in both groups (91.2% vs. 95.7%, p > 0.05). The hemoglobin decline value, hospital stay, serum cystatin C, and percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions in the SF-URL group were obviously better than those in the MPCNL group: (0.8 +/- 0.4) versus (3.9 +/- 2.7) g/dL (p = 0.007), (3.6 +/- 1.5) versus (6.9 +/- 3.1) days (p = 0.013), (1.02 +/- 0.48) versus (2.54 +/- 0.69) mg/L (p = 0.011), and 0 (0.0%) versus 7 (10.0%) (p = 0.016), respectively. The percentages of patients with thrombosis and perirenal hematoma in the MPCNL group were higher than those in the SF-URL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: For the treatment of 2-3-cm renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney, both SF-URL and MPCNL are effective. MPCNL has the advantage of a shorter operation time. However, SF-URL is characterized by less bleeding, shorter hospital stay, and less damage to kidney function.
引用
收藏
页码:1293 / 1297
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Flexible Ureteroscopy with a Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3-cm Renal Stones: Study Protocol for an International, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Noninferiority Trial
    Zhu, Wei
    Chai, Chu Ann
    Ma, Jinxiang
    Gokce, Mehmet Ilker
    Gadzhiev, Nariman
    Kalathia, Jaisukh
    Jiang, Kehua
    Duan, Xianzhong
    Cao, Jianwei
    Wu, Rongpei
    Song, Rijin
    Bai, Song
    Li, Xuedong
    Liu, Shusheng
    Zeng, Guohua
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 70 : 167 - 173
  • [22] Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of analgesic consumption and treatment-related patient satisfaction in patients with renal stones 10–35 mm
    Konrad Wilhelm
    Simon Hein
    Fabian Adams
    Daniel Schlager
    Arkadiusz Miernik
    Martin Schoenthaler
    World Journal of Urology, 2015, 33 : 2131 - 2136
  • [23] Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Patients with Kidney Stones and Their Impact on Inflammatory Response and Renal Function
    Wang, Jianhua
    Wang, Yang
    Yin, Jie
    Xia, Lei
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2024, 95 (02) : 220 - 226
  • [24] COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH KIDNEY STONES GREATER THAN 2 CM
    Zhang, Yu
    Li, Jun
    Tian, Ye
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1050 - E1050
  • [25] Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of analgesic consumption and treatment-related patient satisfaction in patients with renal stones 10-35 mm
    Wilhelm, Konrad
    Hein, Simon
    Adams, Fabian
    Schlager, Daniel
    Miernik, Arkadiusz
    Schoenthaler, Martin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (12) : 2131 - 2136
  • [26] PERCUTANOUS NEPHROSTOLITHOTOMY VERSUS FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY/HOLMIUM LASER LITHOTRIPSY FOR THE TREATMENT OF RENAL STONES MEASURING 2-3CM: A COST AND OUTCOMES ANALYSIS
    Hyams, Elias S.
    Ficile, Mary-Ann
    Shah, Ojas D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 196 - 196
  • [27] Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi
    Zhang, He
    Hong, Tian Yu
    Li, Gang
    Jiang, Ning
    Hu, Chuanyi
    Cui, Xingang
    Chu, Chuanmin
    Zhao, Jun Long
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 102 (02) : 153 - 159
  • [28] The Comparison Study of Flexible Ureteroscopic Suctioning Lithotripsy With Intelligent Pressure Control Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Suctioning Nephrolithotomy in Treating Renal Calculi of 2 to 3 cm in Size
    Chen, Hua
    Qiu, Xuanxi
    Du, Chuance
    Xie, Donghua
    Liu, Tairong
    Wang, Gongxian
    Song, Leming
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2019, 26 (05) : 528 - 535
  • [29] A randomized comparative study of flexible ureterorenoscopy versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones 2 cm or less
    Darwish, Amr E.
    Moneim, Alaa E. Abdel
    Ahmed, Abdelfatah I.
    Hamdy, Seif M.
    Abolella, Hassan A.
    Reda, Ahmed
    CURRENT UROLOGY, 2024, 18 (04) : 273 - 277
  • [30] Acute kidney injury following supine mini-PNL versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with renal stones < 3 cm: a prospective comparative study
    Metin Yığman
    Semih Tangal
    Tuba Candar
    Mehmet İlker Gökçe
    African Journal of Urology, 2020, 26