Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy with Automatic Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure versus Mini PCNL for the Treatment of 2-3-cm Kidney Stones in Patients with a Solitary Kidney

被引:16
|
作者
Deng, Xiaolin [1 ]
Xie, Donghua [1 ]
Huang, Xin [1 ]
Huang, Jianrong [1 ]
Song, Leming [1 ]
Du, Chuance [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Ganzhou Hosp, Ganzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Flexible ureteroscopy; Renal pelvic pressure; Kidney stone; Solitary kidney; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; LITHOTRIPSY; LARGER;
D O I
10.1159/000521373
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the treatment outcomes between suctioning flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy (SF-URL) with automatic control of renal pelvic pressure and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the management of 2-3-cm renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney. Materials and Methods: A total of 127 patients with a solitary kidney who underwent SF-URL (n = 57) or MPCNL (n = 70) for large renal stones (>2 cm) between June 2015 and October 2020 were consecutively analyzed. The stone characteristics, operative times, stone-free rate (SFR), hospital stays, and incidences of complications were compared. Results: There was a significantly shorter operative time with MPCNL than with SF-URL (43.4 +/- 18.9 min vs. 61.8 +/- 21.1 min, p = 0.012). SFR at 30 days were 80.7% (46/57) and 90.0% (63/70) for SF-URL and MPCNL, respectively (p > 0.05). The SFR at the 3-month follow-up was comparable in both groups (91.2% vs. 95.7%, p > 0.05). The hemoglobin decline value, hospital stay, serum cystatin C, and percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions in the SF-URL group were obviously better than those in the MPCNL group: (0.8 +/- 0.4) versus (3.9 +/- 2.7) g/dL (p = 0.007), (3.6 +/- 1.5) versus (6.9 +/- 3.1) days (p = 0.013), (1.02 +/- 0.48) versus (2.54 +/- 0.69) mg/L (p = 0.011), and 0 (0.0%) versus 7 (10.0%) (p = 0.016), respectively. The percentages of patients with thrombosis and perirenal hematoma in the MPCNL group were higher than those in the SF-URL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: For the treatment of 2-3-cm renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney, both SF-URL and MPCNL are effective. MPCNL has the advantage of a shorter operation time. However, SF-URL is characterized by less bleeding, shorter hospital stay, and less damage to kidney function.
引用
收藏
页码:1293 / 1297
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SUCTIONING FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY WITH AUTOMATIC CONTROL OF RENAL PELVIC PRESSURE: A PORCINE MODEL
    Song, Leming
    Deng, Xiaolin
    Xie, Donghua
    Fan, Difu
    Peng, Zuofeng
    Liu, Tairong
    Ye, Zhangqun
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E782 - E782
  • [2] Suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with automatic control of renal pelvic pressure: a porcine model
    Deng, Xiaolin
    Song, Leming
    Xie, Donghua
    Huang, Jianrong
    Zhu, Lunfeng
    Su, Guanghua
    Liao, Xiaohui
    Zhang, Yonghua
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Fan, Difu
    Peng, Zuofeng
    Yang, Zhongsheng
    Liu, Tairong
    Ye, Zhangqun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (03): : 6563 - 6568
  • [3] Comparison of Shockwave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Kidney Stones in Patients with a Solitary Kidney
    Yuruk, Emrah
    Binbay, Murat
    Ozgor, Faruk
    Sekerel, Levent
    Berberoglu, Yalcin
    Muslumanoglu, Ahmet Yaser
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (04) : 463 - 467
  • [4] Efficacy and functional outcome of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney
    Liao, Wenbiao
    Xiong, Yunhe
    Yang, Sixing
    Song, Chao
    Liu, Lingqi
    Meng, Lingchao
    SURGICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 20 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [5] MINI-PCNL VERSUS FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY FOR RENAL STONES OF 1-2 CENTIMETERS
    Kurien, A.
    Jagtap, J.
    Mishra, S.
    Ganpule, A. P.
    Muthu, V.
    Sabnis, R. B.
    Desai, M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A170 - A170
  • [6] Which is better for renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney: shockwave lithotripsy or flexible ureteroscopy?
    Deng, N.
    Liu, P.
    Zou, Z.
    Pan, Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 119 - 119
  • [7] The Application of Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy With Intelligent Pressure Control in Treating Upper Urinary Tract Calculi on Patients With a Solitary Kidney
    Tonyali, Senol
    UROLOGY, 2018, 117 : 166 - 166
  • [8] The Application of Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy With Intelligent Pressure Control in Treating Upper Urinary Tract Calculi on Patients With a Solitary Kidney
    Huang, Jianrong
    Xie, Donghua
    Xiong, Ruiping
    Deng, Xiaolin
    Huang, Chengbing
    Fan, Difu
    Peng, Zuofeng
    Qin, Wen
    Zeng, Min
    Song, Leming
    UROLOGY, 2018, 111 : 44 - 47
  • [9] The learning curve of suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with automatic control of renal pelvic pressure: a single-center experience
    Deng, Xiaolin
    Song, Leming
    Zhu, Xianxin
    Xie, Ning
    Du, Chuance
    Tan, Wanlong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (06): : 7098 - 7103
  • [10] Flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of kidney stone between 2 and 3 cm
    Ben Saddik, M. A.
    Sejiny, S. Al-Qahtani
    Ndoye, M.
    Gil-diez-de-Medina, S.
    Merlet, B.
    Thomas, A.
    Haab, F.
    Traxer, O.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2011, 21 (05): : 327 - 332