The flash memory battle:: How low can we go?

被引:1
|
作者
van Setten, Eelco [1 ]
Wismans, Onno [1 ]
Grim, Kees [1 ]
Finders, Jo [1 ]
Dusa, Mircea [2 ]
Birkner, Robert [3 ]
Richter, Rigo [3 ]
Scheruebl, Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] ASML Netherlands BV, De Run 6501, NL-5504 DR Veldhoven, Netherlands
[2] ASML TDC, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
[3] Carl Zeiss SMS GmbH, D-07740 Jena, Germany
来源
关键词
NAND-Flash; hyper-NA; immersion lithography; AIMS;
D O I
10.1117/12.773266
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
With the introduction of the TWINSCAN XT:1900Gi the limit of the water based hyper-NA immersion lithography has been reached in terms of resolution. With a numerical aperture of 1.35 a single expose resolution of 36.5nm half pitch has been demonstrated. However the practical resolution limit in production will be closer to 40nm half pitch, without having to go to double patterning alike strategies. In the relentless Flash memory market the performance of the exposure tool is stretched to the limit for a competitive advantage and cost-effective product. In this paper we will present the results of an experimental study of the resolution limit of the NAND-Flash Memory Gate layer for a production-worthy process on the TWINSCAN XT:1900Gi. The entire gate layer will be qualified in terms of full wafer CD uniformity, aberration sensitivities for the different wordlines and feature-center placement errors for 38, 39, 40 and 43nm half pitch design rule. In this study we will also compare the performance of a binary intensity mask to a 6% attenuated phase shift mask and look at strategies to maximize Depth of Focus, and to desensitize the gate layer for lens aberrations and placement errors. The mask is one of the dominant contributors to the CD uniformity budget of the flash gate layer. Therefore the wafer measurements are compared to aerial image measurements of the mask using AIMS (TM) 45-1931 to separate the mask contribution from the scanner contribution to the final imaging performance.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] HOW FAR CAN WE GO?
    Kim, Sung Hong
    Maas, Winy
    SPACE, 2016, (584): : 64 - 67
  • [42] How Can We Go Green
    丰凯强
    陈传光
    中学生英语, 2018, (43) : 7 - 7
  • [43] Risk Stratification in Brugada Syndrome: How Low Can We Go?
    Wilde, Arthur A. M.
    Saenen, Johan
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148 (20) : 1556 - 1558
  • [44] Radiation exposure in cardiac electrophysiology: How low can we go?
    Lankaputhra, Malanka
    Voskoboinik, Aleksandr
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 331 : 120 - 121
  • [45] Laser micro-welding: How low can we go?
    Knorovsky, GA
    Semak, VV
    MacCallum, DO
    TRENDS IN WELDING RESEARCH, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 506 - 511
  • [46] Amplitude effects on seismic velocities: How low can we go?
    Melgar, Dolores
    Lauricella, Marco
    O'Brien, Gareth S.
    English, Niall J.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 150 (08):
  • [47] A Weight Criteria for Home Haemodialysis: How Low Can We Go?
    Stronach, Lynsey
    Barton, Carmen
    Reid, Christopher
    Hothi, Daljit
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 28 (08) : 1675 - 1675
  • [48] How low can we go? Perinatal mortality in the Nordic countries
    Bjarnadottir, Ragnheidur
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 : 13 - 13
  • [49] Graft TO recipient weight ratio: How low can we go?
    Makki, K.
    Singhal, A.
    Srivastava, P. K.
    Chorasiya, V. K.
    Srivastava, A.
    Khan, A. A.
    Vij, V.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (08) : 172 - 173
  • [50] The LDL cholesterol in stroke limbo: how low can we go?
    Khan, Muhammad S.
    Krasuski, Richard A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY, 2020, 31 (03) : 161 - 162