The flash memory battle:: How low can we go?

被引:1
|
作者
van Setten, Eelco [1 ]
Wismans, Onno [1 ]
Grim, Kees [1 ]
Finders, Jo [1 ]
Dusa, Mircea [2 ]
Birkner, Robert [3 ]
Richter, Rigo [3 ]
Scheruebl, Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] ASML Netherlands BV, De Run 6501, NL-5504 DR Veldhoven, Netherlands
[2] ASML TDC, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
[3] Carl Zeiss SMS GmbH, D-07740 Jena, Germany
来源
关键词
NAND-Flash; hyper-NA; immersion lithography; AIMS;
D O I
10.1117/12.773266
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
With the introduction of the TWINSCAN XT:1900Gi the limit of the water based hyper-NA immersion lithography has been reached in terms of resolution. With a numerical aperture of 1.35 a single expose resolution of 36.5nm half pitch has been demonstrated. However the practical resolution limit in production will be closer to 40nm half pitch, without having to go to double patterning alike strategies. In the relentless Flash memory market the performance of the exposure tool is stretched to the limit for a competitive advantage and cost-effective product. In this paper we will present the results of an experimental study of the resolution limit of the NAND-Flash Memory Gate layer for a production-worthy process on the TWINSCAN XT:1900Gi. The entire gate layer will be qualified in terms of full wafer CD uniformity, aberration sensitivities for the different wordlines and feature-center placement errors for 38, 39, 40 and 43nm half pitch design rule. In this study we will also compare the performance of a binary intensity mask to a 6% attenuated phase shift mask and look at strategies to maximize Depth of Focus, and to desensitize the gate layer for lens aberrations and placement errors. The mask is one of the dominant contributors to the CD uniformity budget of the flash gate layer. Therefore the wafer measurements are compared to aerial image measurements of the mask using AIMS (TM) 45-1931 to separate the mask contribution from the scanner contribution to the final imaging performance.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pushing the detectability of voltammetry: how low can we go?
    Czae, MZ
    Wang, J
    TALANTA, 1999, 50 (05) : 921 - 928
  • [32] ERCP complication rates: how low can we go?
    Ryan, Michael E.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 70 (01) : 89 - 91
  • [33] Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: how low can we go?
    Rees, Colin
    Dekker, E.
    FRONTLINE GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 13 (05) : 365 - 366
  • [34] DETECTION LIMITS - HOW LOW CAN WE GO - DO WE NEED TO BE THERE
    HOLCOMBE, JA
    APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 1994, 48 (11) : A10 - A11
  • [35] Low-k1 imaging: how low can we go?
    Finders, J
    Eurlings, M
    Schenau, KVI
    Dusa, M
    Jenkins, P
    MICROLITHOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES IN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FABRICATION II, 2000, 4226 : 1 - 15
  • [36] Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: How Low Can We Go?
    Sherbet, Daniel P.
    Garg, Puja
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    Banerjee, Subhash
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, 2013, 13 (04) : 225 - 232
  • [37] Pediactric low-dose CT: How low can we go?
    Caan, G.
    Almeida, A.
    Segbers, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 : S65 - S66
  • [38] Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: How Low Can We Go?
    Daniel P. Sherbet
    Puja Garg
    Emmanouil S. Brilakis
    Subhash Banerjee
    American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2013, 13 : 225 - 232
  • [39] How big can we go?
    Barnes, John
    MER-MARINE ENGINEERS REVIEW, 2007, : 3 - 3
  • [40] How far can we go?
    Lewis, Dan
    POWER ENGINEER, 2007, 21 (01): : 12 - 15