Implementing universal upfront multi-gene panel testing in endometrial cancer: From cost to practical considerations

被引:3
|
作者
Levine, Monica D. [1 ,3 ]
Barrington, David A. [1 ]
Hampel, Heather [2 ]
Goodfellow, Paul J. [1 ]
Cohn, David E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Div Gynecol Oncol, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Columbus, OH USA
[2] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Div Clin Canc Genom, Duarte, CA USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Comprehens Canc Ctr, M210 Starling Loving Hall,320 West 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
LYNCH SYNDROME; MUTATION CARRIERS; OVARIAN-CANCER; CARCINOMA; GERMLINE; FAMILIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.07.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. The routine use of upfront universal germline genetic testing among patients with newly diag-nosed endometrial cancer (EC) has been proposed to improve diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS) and discover pathogenic variants (PVs) in other cancer susceptibility genes. We propose an algorithm prioritizing upfront multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) for newly diagnosed EC patients. Methods. A decision analysis compared the cost of the current algorithm of universal mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) for all EC cases to a new MGPT algorithm that employs upfront MGPT for all EC cases and reserves MMR IHC for the recurrent setting. The increase in the number of LS diagnoses using upfront MGPT, and the number of patients with PVs in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are also estimated. Results. The MGPT algorithm demonstrated a cost savings of $259 per patient. Assuming 66,950 new cases of EC per year, this would represent $17.1 M of cost savings per year. When applied to all new diagnoses of EC in one year, the MGPT algorithm identified 660 (1%) additional cases of LS that would have been missed with the cur-rent algorithm. An additional 660 (1%) EC patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs would be diagnosed only through implementation of universal MGPT. Conclusions. The use of universal upfront MGPT is a practical consideration for patients with newly diagnosed EC for cost savings and improved diagnosis of highly penetrant cancer syndromes. Incorporation of germline genetic testing in the upfront setting represents an opportunity to improve access to genetic counseling and test-ing, and ultimately an avenue to achieve equity and improve the lives of our patients with EC and their families.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 542
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Update on multi-gene panel testing and communication of genetic test results
    Reid, Sonya
    Pal, Tuya
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (08): : 1513 - 1519
  • [42] Patients with negative multi-gene panel testing: a back to the future paradox?
    Sorscher, Steven M.
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2017, 16 (03) : 459 - 459
  • [43] SINGLE-GENE VS. MULTI-GENE PANEL TESTING IN MANAGEMENT OF HEREDITARY GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER SYNDROMES
    Wang, Louise
    Nathanson, John T.
    Long, Jessica
    Ebrahimzadeh, Jessica
    Kumar, Shria
    Wangensteen, Kirk J.
    Katona, Bryson W.
    Rustgi, Anil K.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S1086 - S1086
  • [44] Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer predisposition in unsolved high risk breast and ovarian cancer patients
    Crawford, B. B.
    Adams, S. B.
    Sittler, T.
    Van den Akker, J.
    Chan, S. B.
    Leitner, O.
    Ryan, L. N.
    Gil, E.
    Van't Veer, L. J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [45] Multi-gene panel testing at the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) unit of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
    Adamo, B.
    Moreno, L.
    Gaba, L.
    Vidal, M.
    Pascual, T.
    Chic, N.
    Alonso, I.
    Puig-Butille, J. A.
    Munoz, M.
    Prat, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 : 42 - +
  • [46] Prevalence of pathogenic genetic variants in patients with gastric cancer ascertained through multi-gene panel testing
    Gilad, Ophir
    Keel, Emma
    Russell, Emily M.
    Young, Sarah M. Nielsen
    Heald, Brandie
    Esplin, Ed
    Korn, W. Michael
    Roberts, Maegan
    Burke, Carol A.
    Kupfer, Sonia S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [47] Multi-gene panel testing increases yield of surgically actionable results among breast cancer patients
    Palaniappan, Selvi
    Harvell, Tameron
    LaDuca, Holly
    Yussuf, Amal
    Profato, Jessica
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : 280 - 280
  • [48] Role of the multi-gene panel testing for detection of pathogenic variants in patients with hereditary bilateral breast cancer
    Filorizzo, C.
    Fanale, D.
    Incorvaia, L.
    Barraco, N.
    Bono, M.
    Brando, C.
    Calo, V.
    Cancelliere, D.
    Cucinella, A.
    Dimino, A.
    Fiorino, A.
    Magrin, L.
    Pedone, E.
    Perez, A.
    Pivetti, A.
    Sammataro, S.
    Sciacchitano, R.
    Vaccaro, G.
    Bazan, V.
    Russo, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S432 - S433
  • [49] A plausible normal polymorphism of MUTYH splicing variant detected through multi-gene cancer panel testing
    Yamamoto, Rie
    Nishisaka, Takashi
    Hattori, Yui
    Doi, Mihoko
    Shinozaki, Katsunori
    Ishikawa, Nobuhisa
    Yamamoto, Hideki
    Hirasawa, Akira
    Hara, Tetsuaki
    Itamoto, Toshiyuki
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2021, 112 : 663 - 663
  • [50] Detection of inherited mutations in Brazilian breast cancer patients using multi-gene panel testing.
    Guindalini, Rodrigo Santa Cruz
    Viana, Danilo
    Kitajima, Joao Paulo
    Valim, Andre
    Schlesinger, David
    Kok, Fernando
    Koike Folgueira, Maria A. A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)