Implementing universal upfront multi-gene panel testing in endometrial cancer: From cost to practical considerations

被引:3
|
作者
Levine, Monica D. [1 ,3 ]
Barrington, David A. [1 ]
Hampel, Heather [2 ]
Goodfellow, Paul J. [1 ]
Cohn, David E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Div Gynecol Oncol, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Columbus, OH USA
[2] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Div Clin Canc Genom, Duarte, CA USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Comprehens Canc Ctr, M210 Starling Loving Hall,320 West 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
LYNCH SYNDROME; MUTATION CARRIERS; OVARIAN-CANCER; CARCINOMA; GERMLINE; FAMILIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.07.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. The routine use of upfront universal germline genetic testing among patients with newly diag-nosed endometrial cancer (EC) has been proposed to improve diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (LS) and discover pathogenic variants (PVs) in other cancer susceptibility genes. We propose an algorithm prioritizing upfront multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) for newly diagnosed EC patients. Methods. A decision analysis compared the cost of the current algorithm of universal mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) for all EC cases to a new MGPT algorithm that employs upfront MGPT for all EC cases and reserves MMR IHC for the recurrent setting. The increase in the number of LS diagnoses using upfront MGPT, and the number of patients with PVs in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are also estimated. Results. The MGPT algorithm demonstrated a cost savings of $259 per patient. Assuming 66,950 new cases of EC per year, this would represent $17.1 M of cost savings per year. When applied to all new diagnoses of EC in one year, the MGPT algorithm identified 660 (1%) additional cases of LS that would have been missed with the cur-rent algorithm. An additional 660 (1%) EC patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs would be diagnosed only through implementation of universal MGPT. Conclusions. The use of universal upfront MGPT is a practical consideration for patients with newly diagnosed EC for cost savings and improved diagnosis of highly penetrant cancer syndromes. Incorporation of germline genetic testing in the upfront setting represents an opportunity to improve access to genetic counseling and test-ing, and ultimately an avenue to achieve equity and improve the lives of our patients with EC and their families.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 542
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi gene panel testing in unselected patients (pts) with endometrial cancer (EC).
    Cadoo, Karen Anne
    DeLair, Deborah
    Mandelker, Diana
    Barakat, Richard R.
    Brown, Carol L.
    Chi, Dennis
    Gardner, GingerJ.
    Jewell, Elizabeth Lin
    Leitao, Mario M.
    Long, Kara
    Mueller, Jennifer Jean
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Zivanovic, Oliver
    Berger, Michael F.
    Zhang, Liying
    Robson, Mark E.
    Offit, Kenneth
    Aghajanian, Carol
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem
    Stadler, Zsofia Kinga
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [32] Inference of genetic ancestry from a multi-gene cancer panel in Colombian women with cancer
    Zambrano-O, Yina T.
    Mejia-Garcia, Alejandro
    Morales, P. Daniela
    Tsao, Hsuan Megan
    Rey-Vargas, Laura
    Montero-Ovalle, Wendy
    Huertas-Caro, Carlos A.
    Sanabria-Salas, M. C.
    Riano-Moreno, Julian
    Rodriguez, Juliana L.
    Orozco, Carlos A.
    Lopez-Kleine, Liliana
    Jordan, I. King
    Serrano-G, Silvia J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, : 251 - 259
  • [33] Psychological distress following multi-gene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk
    Carlsson, Lindsay
    Bedard, Philippe L.
    Kim, Raymond H.
    Metcalfe, Kelly
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2025, 34 (02)
  • [34] CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WITH A PRIMARY BRAIN TUMOR UNDERGOING HEREDITARY CANCER MULTI-GENE PANEL TESTING
    Azam, Sarah
    Qualmann, Krista
    Hashmi, Syed
    Ramdaney, Aarti
    Rodriguez-Buritica, David
    Dunnington, Leslie
    Jackson, Michelle
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 20 : 103 - 103
  • [35] Multi-gene panel testing using NGS for Lynch syndrome and MSI-H cancer
    Akagi, Kiwamu
    Yamamoto, Gou
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2021, 112 : 1011 - 1011
  • [36] Frequency of mutations in multi-gene panel testing of 3,011 breast cancer patients
    Zhou, Alicia Y.
    van den Akker, Jeroen
    Zimmer, Anjali
    McFadden, Will
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (04)
  • [37] Clinical impact of multi-gene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment
    Ellisen, Leif W.
    Kurian, Allison W.
    Desmond, Andrea J.
    Mills, Meredith
    Lincoln, Stephen E.
    Shannon, Kristen M.
    Gabree, Michele
    Tung, Nadine M.
    Ford, James M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [38] HBOC multi-gene panel testing: comparison of two sequencing centers
    Christopher Schroeder
    Ulrike Faust
    Marc Sturm
    Karl Hackmann
    Kathrin Grundmann
    Florian Harmuth
    Kristin Bosse
    Martin Kehrer
    Tanja Benkert
    Barbara Klink
    Luisa Mackenroth
    Elitza Betcheva-Krajcir
    Pauline Wimberger
    Karin Kast
    Mechthilde Heilig
    Huu Phuc Nguyen
    Olaf Riess
    Evelin Schröck
    Peter Bauer
    Andreas Rump
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015, 152 : 129 - 136
  • [39] Patients with negative multi-gene panel testing: a back to the future paradox?
    Steven M. Sorscher
    Familial Cancer, 2017, 16 : 459 - 459
  • [40] HBOC multi-gene panel testing: comparison of two sequencing centers
    Schroeder, Christopher
    Faust, Ulrike
    Sturm, Marc
    Hackmann, Karl
    Grundmann, Kathrin
    Harmuth, Florian
    Bosse, Kristin
    Kehrer, Martin
    Benkert, Tanja
    Klink, Barbara
    Mackenroth, Luisa
    Betcheva-Krajcir, Elitza
    Wimberger, Pauline
    Kast, Karin
    Heilig, Mechthilde
    Huu Phuc Nguyen
    Riess, Olaf
    Schroeck, Evelin
    Bauer, Peter
    Rump, Andreas
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 152 (01) : 129 - 136