Variation analysis of automated wing box assembly

被引:7
|
作者
Bakker, Otto J. [1 ]
Popov, Atanas A. [1 ]
Ratchev, Svetan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Adv Mfg Technol Res Grp, Univ Pk Campus, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
来源
MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS 4.0 | 2017年 / 63卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Variation analysis; aerospace manufacture; multistage assembly process;
D O I
10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.034
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Manufacturing process variability is a major issue of concern in high value industries. Manufacturing small batches and in some cases batches of one is a very expensive process with specific requirements for manufacturing operations, tooling and fixturing and their level of automation and informatics provision. The automation targets cost reduction and a counterbalancing of the ever lower numbers of skilled shop floor workers. However, these small series typically are products that contain complex and compliant parts, and often also a high number of parts and components. The automation of this type of low-volume high-value production can be a daunting task. Each process has its own key parameters that are required to be within a certain tolerance band in order to ensure product quality, such as e. g. the dimensions and location of assembly mating features. Dimensional quality assurance is typically done with in-process measurement, or the measurement of certain key characteristics (KCs) in the current setup, but a special setup may have to be used in a measurement-only step in the manufacturing process. Each manufacturing stage introduces errors stemming from uncertainties in the fixturing, used processes etc. These errors will propagate in downstream stages and can even worsen errors introduced in the latter stages. The paper presents a new generic methodology for the use of stream of variation (SoV) analysis within a Smart Factory environment such as the Evolvable Assembly Systems (EAS) framework. The research is demonstrated using a simplified case study of one of EAS demonstrators for an aircraft wing box assembly. The wing box assembly and its KCs are described using formal representation. The SoV model is applied to model and simulate the assembly process. The simulation results are then analysed to predict, control and minimise the error propagation coming from uncertainties in process and equipment. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 411
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SUPERSTRONG WING BOX OF TOMCAT.
    Anon
    Welding Design and Fabrication, 1974, 47 (05): : 33 - 36
  • [42] CARDBOARD-BOX WING STRUCTURES
    SHANLEY, FR
    JOURNAL OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 1947, 14 (12): : 713 - 715
  • [43] STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION OF BOX WING AIRCRAFT
    Kalinowski, Milosz J.
    ARCHIVE OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 62 (01) : 45 - 60
  • [44] Structural Analysis of 3D Printed UAV Straight Wing Box
    Kuntjoro, W.
    Ridhwan, M. Azri M.
    Nasir, Rizal E. M.
    Muta'ali, Atikah B. A.
    JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS AND AVIATION, 2022, 54 (03): : 347 - 356
  • [45] Intraoperative automated ST segment analysis: A reliable 'Black box'?
    Yang, H
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1996, 43 (10): : 1041 - 1051
  • [46] Opening the Black Box: Automated Software Analysis for Algorithm Selection
    Pulatov, Damir
    Anastacio, Marie
    Kotthoff, Lars
    Hoos, Holger
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATED MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 188, 2022, 188
  • [47] Efficient numerical algorithm of profust reliability analysis: An application to wing box structure
    Feng, Kaixuan
    Lu, Zhenzhou
    Pang, Chao
    Yun, Wanying
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 80 : 203 - 211
  • [48] EQUIVALENT PLATE ANALYSIS OF AIRCRAFT WING BOX STRUCTURES WITH GENERAL PLANFORM GEOMETRY
    GILES, GL
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1986, 23 (11): : 859 - 864
  • [49] Buckling and post-buckling analysis of stiffened panels in wing box structures
    Riks, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2000, 37 (46-47) : 6795 - 6824
  • [50] Vehicle conceptual assembly variation analysis system
    Chen Shaoyun
    Li Yubing
    Lai Xinmin
    Jin Sun
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2010, 51 : 1111 - 1120