Variation analysis of automated wing box assembly

被引:7
|
作者
Bakker, Otto J. [1 ]
Popov, Atanas A. [1 ]
Ratchev, Svetan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Adv Mfg Technol Res Grp, Univ Pk Campus, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
来源
MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS 4.0 | 2017年 / 63卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Variation analysis; aerospace manufacture; multistage assembly process;
D O I
10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.034
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Manufacturing process variability is a major issue of concern in high value industries. Manufacturing small batches and in some cases batches of one is a very expensive process with specific requirements for manufacturing operations, tooling and fixturing and their level of automation and informatics provision. The automation targets cost reduction and a counterbalancing of the ever lower numbers of skilled shop floor workers. However, these small series typically are products that contain complex and compliant parts, and often also a high number of parts and components. The automation of this type of low-volume high-value production can be a daunting task. Each process has its own key parameters that are required to be within a certain tolerance band in order to ensure product quality, such as e. g. the dimensions and location of assembly mating features. Dimensional quality assurance is typically done with in-process measurement, or the measurement of certain key characteristics (KCs) in the current setup, but a special setup may have to be used in a measurement-only step in the manufacturing process. Each manufacturing stage introduces errors stemming from uncertainties in the fixturing, used processes etc. These errors will propagate in downstream stages and can even worsen errors introduced in the latter stages. The paper presents a new generic methodology for the use of stream of variation (SoV) analysis within a Smart Factory environment such as the Evolvable Assembly Systems (EAS) framework. The research is demonstrated using a simplified case study of one of EAS demonstrators for an aircraft wing box assembly. The wing box assembly and its KCs are described using formal representation. The SoV model is applied to model and simulate the assembly process. The simulation results are then analysed to predict, control and minimise the error propagation coming from uncertainties in process and equipment. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 411
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Variation analysis for compliant assembly
    Hu, S. Jack
    Long, Yufeng
    Camelio, Jaime
    American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Manufacturing Engineering Division, MED, 2000, 11 : 31 - 37
  • [22] GATB: Genome Assembly & Analysis Tool Box
    Drezen, Erwan
    Rizk, Guillaume
    Chikhi, Rayan
    Deltel, Charles
    Lemaitre, Claire
    Peterlongo, Pierre
    Lavenier, Dominique
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 30 (20) : 2959 - 2961
  • [23] Static Analysis of 3D-Printed Sub Wing Box Lug Joint Assembly using Finite Element Method
    Kuntjoro, W.
    Latip, Ummu H. M.
    Nasir, Rizal E. M.
    Ramly, R.
    JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS AND AVIATION, 2022, 54 (03): : 335 - 346
  • [24] Discussion of Reliability Analysis for Aircraft Wing Box Structural System
    Zhao Weitao
    Zhang Daqian
    MATERIALS AND PRODUCT TECHNOLOGIES, 2010, 118-120 : 236 - +
  • [25] OPTIMIZATION ANALYSIS OF AUTOMATED ASSEMBLY SYSTEMS
    HITOMI, K
    YOKOYAMA, M
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1981, 103 (02): : 224 - 232
  • [26] ANALYSIS OF SUBASSEMBLY STABILITY FOR AUTOMATED ASSEMBLY
    VISHNU, A
    NNAJI, B
    ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 1992, 9 (06) : 447 - 470
  • [27] Automating wing assembly
    不详
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 73 (04): : 395 - 398
  • [28] Multidimensional analysis of Drosophila wing variation in Evolution Canyon
    Debat, Vincent
    Cornette, Raphael
    Korol, Abraham B.
    Nevo, Eviatar
    Soulet, David
    David, Jean R.
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2008, 87 (04) : 407 - 419
  • [29] Multidimensional analysis of Drosophila wing variation in Evolution Canyon
    Vincent Debat
    Raphael Cornette
    Abraham B. Korol
    Eviatar Nevo
    David Soulet
    Jean R. David
    Journal of Genetics, 2008, 87 : 407 - 419
  • [30] Robotic wing assembly
    Bokulich, F
    AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2000, 20 (08) : 16 - 16