Variation analysis of automated wing box assembly

被引:7
|
作者
Bakker, Otto J. [1 ]
Popov, Atanas A. [1 ]
Ratchev, Svetan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Adv Mfg Technol Res Grp, Univ Pk Campus, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
来源
MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS 4.0 | 2017年 / 63卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Variation analysis; aerospace manufacture; multistage assembly process;
D O I
10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.034
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Manufacturing process variability is a major issue of concern in high value industries. Manufacturing small batches and in some cases batches of one is a very expensive process with specific requirements for manufacturing operations, tooling and fixturing and their level of automation and informatics provision. The automation targets cost reduction and a counterbalancing of the ever lower numbers of skilled shop floor workers. However, these small series typically are products that contain complex and compliant parts, and often also a high number of parts and components. The automation of this type of low-volume high-value production can be a daunting task. Each process has its own key parameters that are required to be within a certain tolerance band in order to ensure product quality, such as e. g. the dimensions and location of assembly mating features. Dimensional quality assurance is typically done with in-process measurement, or the measurement of certain key characteristics (KCs) in the current setup, but a special setup may have to be used in a measurement-only step in the manufacturing process. Each manufacturing stage introduces errors stemming from uncertainties in the fixturing, used processes etc. These errors will propagate in downstream stages and can even worsen errors introduced in the latter stages. The paper presents a new generic methodology for the use of stream of variation (SoV) analysis within a Smart Factory environment such as the Evolvable Assembly Systems (EAS) framework. The research is demonstrated using a simplified case study of one of EAS demonstrators for an aircraft wing box assembly. The wing box assembly and its KCs are described using formal representation. The SoV model is applied to model and simulate the assembly process. The simulation results are then analysed to predict, control and minimise the error propagation coming from uncertainties in process and equipment. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 411
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automated wing box assembly
    Birch, S
    AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 1999, 19 (10) : 8 - 8
  • [2] Using simulation to demonstrate automated wing box assembly
    不详
    ASSEMBLY AUTOMATION, 2000, 20 (01) : 65 - 65
  • [3] Development of Automated Flexible Tooling as Enabler in Wing Box Assembly
    Erdem, Ilker
    Helgosson, Peter
    Kihlman, Henrik
    6TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON ASSEMBLY TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS (CATS), 2016, 44 : 233 - 238
  • [4] Positioning variation synthesis for an automated drilling system in wing assembly
    Mei, Biao
    Liang, Zengsheng
    Zhu, Weidong
    Ke, Yinglin
    ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2021, 67
  • [5] Automatic wing box assembly developments
    Rooks, B
    INDUSTRIAL ROBOT, 2001, 28 (04): : 297 - 301
  • [6] Pose and shape error control in automated machining of fastener holes for composite/metal wing-box assembly
    Mei, Biao
    Wang, Haijin
    Zhu, Weidong
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2021, 66 : 101 - 114
  • [7] Variation Sensitivity Study for an Aerospace Wing Spar Assembly
    Mckenna, Vincent
    Jin, Yan
    Murphy, Adrian
    Morgan, Michael
    Fu, Rao
    Mcclory, Caroline
    Higgins, Colm
    Collins, Rory
    Qin, Xuda
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXXII, 2018, 8 : 171 - 176
  • [8] First F-2 wing-box assembly delivered
    Bokulich, F
    AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 1999, 19 (07) : 18 - 18
  • [9] Cost efficiency, integration and assembly of a generic composite aeronautical wing box
    Hagnell, M. K.
    Langbeck, B.
    Akermo, M.
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2016, 152 : 1014 - 1023
  • [10] Testing and analysis of downscaled composite wing box
    Kong, CW
    Park, JS
    Cho, JH
    Hong, CS
    Kim, CG
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2002, 39 (03): : 480 - 485