Antegrade Superficial Femoral Artery Access for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Is Safe and Effective in the Outpatient Setting

被引:3
|
作者
Pezold, Michael [1 ]
Blumberg, Sheila [1 ]
Sadek, Mikel [1 ]
Maldonado, Thomas [1 ]
Cayne, Neal [1 ]
Jacobowitz, Glenn [1 ]
James, Herbert [2 ]
Berland, Todd [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, Div Vasc Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
RADIATION-EXPOSURE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2020.10.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Antegrade superficial femoral artery (SFA) access for peripheral artery disease reduces the time, radiation, and contrast required with contralateral common femoral access (CFA). Yet, this technique remains underutilized in the treatment of SFA, popliteal and tibial dis-ease, and there remains limited data on the safety and effectiveness of antegrade SFA access in the outpatient setting. Methods: A retrospective review of lower extremity peripheral arterial interventions in our office-based endovascular suite was conducted from 2013 to 2018. Interventions necessitating CFA access such as iliac, common femoral, or deep femoral artery revascularization were excluded (n = 206). In addition, interventions potentially requiring large sheaths not amenable to SFA access (e.g., popliteal aneurysm) were excluded. Relevant demographic and treatment variables including postoperative complications were abstracted. Results: We identified 718 patients, who underwent revascularization of the SFA, popli-teal and tibial arteries. Antegrade SFA access was chosen in 448 patients (62.4%) with the remaining 270 patients having retrograde CFA access. Antegrade SFA access was achieved primarily with a 4-French sheath, while a majority of retrograde CFA interven-tions utilized a 6-French sheath for access (87.7% vs 69.5%, P < 0.001). Significantly less fluoroscopy (9.5 vs 16.4 min, P < 0.001) and contrast (25.4 vs 38.5 mL, P < 0.001) were used during SFA access compared with retrograde access. Technical success was achieved in 93.2% with antegrade SFA vs 94.8% retrograde CFA access (P = 0.42). The overall rate of complications was low for both cohorts (2.7% vs 3.7%, P = 0.78) and there were no statistical differences in access site complications (1.1% vs 1.5%, P = 0.94), hematoma (0.7% vs 1.1%, P = 0.84), and pseudoaneurysm (0.4% vs 0%, P = 0.98) between techniques. Conclusions: Percutaneous antegrade SFA access can be performed safely in the outpatient setting and remains an effective alternative to retrograde CFA access with significantly less uti-lization of fluoroscopy and contrast.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 181
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radial arterial access is a safe alternative to brachial artery and femoral artery access for endovascular lower extremity peripheral arterial disease
    Maximus, Steven
    Kwong, Mimmie
    Harding, Joel
    Mell, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (03) : 870 - 876
  • [2] Radial Artery Access Is a Safe Alternative to Brachial Artery and Femoral Artery Access for Endovascular Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease
    Maximus, Steven
    Kwong, Mimmie
    Harding, Joel
    Mell, Matthew W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (03) : E250 - E250
  • [3] Radial Artery Access is a Safe Alternative to Brachial Artery and Femoral Artery Access for Endovascular Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease
    Maximus, Steven
    Kwong, Mimmie
    Mell, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (04) : E408 - E409
  • [4] Percutaneous, Antegrade Access of the Superficial Femoral Artery can be Safely Used in Procedures for the Treatment of Lower Extremity Limb Ischemia
    Gedney, Ryan
    Villacreses, Camila F.
    Wooster, Mathew D.
    Genovese, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 91 : 218 - 222
  • [5] Safety and Effectiveness of Antegrade Superficial Femoral Artery Access in an Office-Based Ambulatory Setting
    Blumberg, Sheila N.
    Sadek, Mikel
    Maldonado, Thomas
    Jacobowitz, Glenn
    Gelbfish, Gary
    Cayne, Neal
    Rockman, Caron
    Berland, Todd
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 176S - 177S
  • [6] Complication Rates for Percutaneous Lower Extremity Arterial Antegrade Access
    Wheatley, Brian J.
    Mansour, M. Ashraf
    Grossman, P. Michael
    Munir, Khan
    Cali, Robert F.
    Gorsuch, Jill M.
    Cuff, Robert F.
    Wong, Peter Y.
    Chambers, Christopher M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 146 (04) : 432 - 435
  • [7] Comparison between antegrade common femoral artery access and superficial femoral artery access in infrainguinal endovascular interventions
    Biagioni, Luisa Ciucci
    Pereira, Leticia
    Nasser, Felipe
    Biagioni, Rodrigo Bruno
    Burihan, Marcelo Calil
    Wolosker, Nelson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (03) : 763 - 770
  • [8] Antegrade Access to the Superficial Femoral Artery with Ultrasound Guidance: Feasibility and Safety
    Gutzeit, Andreas
    Schoch, Eric
    Sautter, Thomas
    Jenelten, Regula
    Graf, Nicole
    Binkert, Christoph A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (10) : 1495 - 1500
  • [9] Ultrasound-guided antegrade femoral access: comparison between the common femoral artery and the superficial femoral artery
    A. Gutzeit
    N. Graf
    E. Schoch
    T. Sautter
    R. Jenelten
    C. A. Binkert
    [J]. European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 1323 - 1328
  • [10] Ultrasound-guided antegrade femoral access: comparison between the common femoral artery and the superficial femoral artery
    Gutzeit, A.
    Graf, N.
    Schoch, E.
    Sautter, T.
    Jenelten, R.
    Binkert, C. A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (06) : 1323 - 1328