Antegrade Access to the Superficial Femoral Artery with Ultrasound Guidance: Feasibility and Safety

被引:20
|
作者
Gutzeit, Andreas [1 ]
Schoch, Eric [1 ]
Sautter, Thomas [1 ]
Jenelten, Regula
Graf, Nicole [2 ]
Binkert, Christoph A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kantonsspital Winterthur, Dept Radiol, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Clin Trials Ctr, Clin Res Ctr, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
PUNCTURE; PSEUDOANEURYSM; SITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvir.2010.03.021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of antegrade superficial femoral artery (SFA) access with the use of ultrasound (US) guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients (56% men) were prospectively enrolled, with a median age of 76 years. The SFA was punctured in antegrade fashion with a 19-gauge needle with US guidance, followed by sheath placement. The time from local anesthesia until successful blood aspiration from the sheath was measured. At the end of the case, hemostasis was achieved with a closure device or by manual compression. All cases were followed with US for access complications. RESULTS: Antegrade arterial access was successful in all cases. The arterial sheath was successfully placed into the SFA in 98 of 100 patients. In 95 of 98, the sheath was inserted with US guidance only; additional fluoroscopy was needed in three cases. In two of 100 patients, the common femoral artery (CFA) was accessed, accidentally in one case and deliberately in the other because the SFA was considered too small. Both patients were excluded from further analysis. The median time for arterial access was 3.5 minutes (interquartile range, 3.1-6.2 min). All complications directly related to vascular access were minor (16; 15.68%): 10 pseudoaneurysms (10.2%; median diameter, 15 mm) and six hematomas (6.12%; median diameter, 31.5 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade puncture into the SFA with US guidance is feasible and fast. The rate of minor complications is similar to other reported series, but a direct comparison with other studies is difficult because study designs vary.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1500
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-guided antegrade femoral access: comparison between the common femoral artery and the superficial femoral artery
    A. Gutzeit
    N. Graf
    E. Schoch
    T. Sautter
    R. Jenelten
    C. A. Binkert
    [J]. European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 1323 - 1328
  • [2] Ultrasound-guided antegrade femoral access: comparison between the common femoral artery and the superficial femoral artery
    Gutzeit, A.
    Graf, N.
    Schoch, E.
    Sautter, T.
    Jenelten, R.
    Binkert, C. A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (06) : 1323 - 1328
  • [3] Feasibility and Safety of Vascular Closure Devices in an Antegrade Approach to Either the Common Femoral Artery or the Superficial Femoral Artery
    Andreas Gutzeit
    Bram van Schie
    Eric Schoch
    Klaus Hergan
    Nicole Graf
    Christoph A. Binkert
    [J]. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2012, 35 : 1036 - 1040
  • [4] Feasibility and Safety of Vascular Closure Devices in an Antegrade Approach to Either the Common Femoral Artery or the Superficial Femoral Artery
    Gutzeit, Andreas
    van Schie, Bram
    Schoch, Eric
    Hergan, Klaus
    Graf, Nicole
    Binkert, Christoph A.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (05) : 1036 - 1040
  • [5] The Utility of Ultrasound Guidance to Improve the Safety of Closure of Antegrade Common Femoral Artery Access after Lower Limb Revascularization
    Ong, Daniel Yuxuan
    Yong, Enming
    Huang, Ivan Kuang Hsin
    Loy, Liang Meng
    Lee, Zhong Yun
    Tan, Glenn Wei Leong
    Quek, Lawrence Han Hwee
    Lim, Gavin Hock Tai
    Kwan, Justin
    Chan, Gabriel
    Hui, Terrence Chi Hong
    Wu, Yi-Wei
    Pua, Uei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (12) : 2208 - 2212
  • [6] Safety and Effectiveness of Antegrade Superficial Femoral Artery Access in an Office-Based Ambulatory Setting
    Blumberg, Sheila N.
    Sadek, Mikel
    Maldonado, Thomas
    Jacobowitz, Glenn
    Gelbfish, Gary
    Cayne, Neal
    Rockman, Caron
    Berland, Todd
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 176S - 177S
  • [7] Comparison between antegrade common femoral artery access and superficial femoral artery access in infrainguinal endovascular interventions
    Biagioni, Luisa Ciucci
    Pereira, Leticia
    Nasser, Felipe
    Biagioni, Rodrigo Bruno
    Burihan, Marcelo Calil
    Wolosker, Nelson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (03) : 763 - 770
  • [8] ANTEGRADE CATHETERIZATION OF THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL-ARTERY
    SADDEKNI, S
    SRUR, M
    COHN, DJ
    ROZENBLIT, G
    WETTER, EB
    SOS, TA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1985, 157 (02) : 531 - 532
  • [9] Should Ultrasound Guidance Be Routinely Used for Femoral Artery Access?
    Soud, Mohamad
    Fanari, Zaher
    Kaki, Amir
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    [J]. STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM, 2018, 2 (04): : 291 - 294
  • [10] Superficial femoral artery catheterisation with two parallel guidewires after femoris profunda artery cannulation in antegrade percutaneous femoral access
    Zenunaj, G.
    Traina, L.
    Gasbarro, V.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2021, 103 (09) : 701 - 702