Antegrade Superficial Femoral Artery Access for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Is Safe and Effective in the Outpatient Setting

被引:3
|
作者
Pezold, Michael [1 ]
Blumberg, Sheila [1 ]
Sadek, Mikel [1 ]
Maldonado, Thomas [1 ]
Cayne, Neal [1 ]
Jacobowitz, Glenn [1 ]
James, Herbert [2 ]
Berland, Todd [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, Div Vasc Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
RADIATION-EXPOSURE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2020.10.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Antegrade superficial femoral artery (SFA) access for peripheral artery disease reduces the time, radiation, and contrast required with contralateral common femoral access (CFA). Yet, this technique remains underutilized in the treatment of SFA, popliteal and tibial dis-ease, and there remains limited data on the safety and effectiveness of antegrade SFA access in the outpatient setting. Methods: A retrospective review of lower extremity peripheral arterial interventions in our office-based endovascular suite was conducted from 2013 to 2018. Interventions necessitating CFA access such as iliac, common femoral, or deep femoral artery revascularization were excluded (n = 206). In addition, interventions potentially requiring large sheaths not amenable to SFA access (e.g., popliteal aneurysm) were excluded. Relevant demographic and treatment variables including postoperative complications were abstracted. Results: We identified 718 patients, who underwent revascularization of the SFA, popli-teal and tibial arteries. Antegrade SFA access was chosen in 448 patients (62.4%) with the remaining 270 patients having retrograde CFA access. Antegrade SFA access was achieved primarily with a 4-French sheath, while a majority of retrograde CFA interven-tions utilized a 6-French sheath for access (87.7% vs 69.5%, P < 0.001). Significantly less fluoroscopy (9.5 vs 16.4 min, P < 0.001) and contrast (25.4 vs 38.5 mL, P < 0.001) were used during SFA access compared with retrograde access. Technical success was achieved in 93.2% with antegrade SFA vs 94.8% retrograde CFA access (P = 0.42). The overall rate of complications was low for both cohorts (2.7% vs 3.7%, P = 0.78) and there were no statistical differences in access site complications (1.1% vs 1.5%, P = 0.94), hematoma (0.7% vs 1.1%, P = 0.84), and pseudoaneurysm (0.4% vs 0%, P = 0.98) between techniques. Conclusions: Percutaneous antegrade SFA access can be performed safely in the outpatient setting and remains an effective alternative to retrograde CFA access with significantly less uti-lization of fluoroscopy and contrast.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 181
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Retrograde Deep Femoral Artery Access as Bailout Technique to Rescue Unexpected Ostial Occlusion during Antegrade Superficial Femoral Artery Recanalization
    Testi, Gabriele
    Ceccacci, Tanja
    Paciaroni, Elisa
    Tarantino, Fabio
    Turicchia, Giorgio Ubaldo
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 66 : 666.e7 - 666.e10
  • [22] Hybrid Endarterectomy and Endovascular Therapy in Multilevel Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Involving the Femoral Artery Bifurcation
    Zou, Junjie
    Xia, Yongxiang
    Yang, Hongyu
    Ma, Hao
    Zhang, Xiwei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2012, 97 (01) : 56 - 64
  • [23] Duplication of Superficial Femoral Artery: An Uncommon Variation of the Lower Limb Arterial System
    Javerliat, Isabelle
    Rouanet, Antoine
    Bourguignon, Thierry
    Long, Anne
    Lermusiaux, Patrick
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 24 (03) : 415.e1 - 415.e3
  • [24] Retrograde transpopliteal access in the supine patient for recanalization of the superficial femoral artery after failed antegrade angioplasty
    Eweda, Ashraf
    El Shemy, Wael
    Sad, Mohamed
    Hamza, Mohamed
    Gouda, Aser
    Tawfik, Ahmad
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 34 (03): : 141 - 145
  • [25] Superficial Femoral Artery Access for Infrainguinal Antegrade Endovascular Interventions in the Hostile Groin: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Zenunaj, Gladiol
    Traina, Luca
    Acciarri, Pierfilippo
    Mucignat, Marianna
    Scian, Sabrina
    Alesiani, Francesca
    Serra, Raffaele
    Gasbarro, Vincenzo
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 86 : 127 - 134
  • [26] Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease in hospitalized patients with coronary artery disease
    Dieter, RS
    Tomasson, J
    Gudjonsson, T
    Brown, RL
    Vitcenda, M
    Einerson, J
    McBride, PE
    [J]. VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2003, 8 (04) : 233 - 236
  • [27] Wall shear stress in the stented superficial femoral artery in peripheral arterial disease
    Schlager, Oliver
    Zehetmayer, Sonja
    Seidinger, Daniela
    van der Loo, Bernd
    Koppensteiner, Renate
    [J]. ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2014, 233 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [28] Outpatient Endovascular Tibial Artery Intervention in an Office-Based Setting Is as Safe and Effective as in a Hospital Setting
    D'Souza, Steve M.
    Stout, Christopher L.
    Krol, Emilia
    Dexter, David J.
    Ahanchi, Sadaf Sadie
    Panneton, Jean M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2018, 25 (06) : 666 - 672
  • [29] Carotid and lower extremity arterial disease in patients with renal artery atherosclerosis
    Zierler, RE
    Bergelin, RO
    Polissar, NL
    Beach, KW
    Caps, MT
    Cantwell-Gab, K
    Davidson, RC
    Strandness, DE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (07) : 761 - 767
  • [30] MOLECULAR DRIVERS OF MEDIAL ARTERIAL CALCIFICATION IN LOWER EXTREMITY ARTERY DISEASE
    Thakur, Manovriti
    Angliker, Nico
    Siegrist, Mark
    Jansen, Yvonne
    Martinez, Berenice
    Wollenhaupt, Julia
    Noels, Heidi
    Doring, Yvonne
    [J]. ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2024, 395