Preferences for community renewable energy investments in Europe

被引:38
|
作者
Cohen, Jed J. [1 ]
Azarova, Valeriya [2 ]
Kollmann, Andrea [1 ]
Reichl, Johannes [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Energy Inst, Altenberger Str 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[2] Univ Munich, Ifo Inst, Leibniz Inst Econ Res, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Energy cooperatives; Community investment; Energy citizenship; Energy transition; Choice experiment; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; WIND ENERGY; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; HOUSEHOLD ADOPTION; SOLAR-ENERGY; FARMS; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105386
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of a choice experiment for investments in community renewable energy (CRE) projects administered across 31 European nations. In the sample of 18,037 respondents, a high level of interest in the CRE investments is observed, with 79% of respondents choosing to invest in at least one of the eight investment scenarios shown to them. Along with financial concerns, operational and siting aspects of the investment options are highly relevant to potential investors. Specifically, investments that are administered as an energy cooperative and run by a community organization are preferred to investments administered by utility companies. Heterogeneity across Europe is present in the preference for the installation to be visible from an investor's home, and thereby potentially affect the viewshed but also allow for a perception of self-sufficiency. The results suggest that energy policies hoping to increase the uptake of the CRE model across Europe would do well to focus on supporting local organizations to administer such projects, and to highlight any positive local economic impacts from renewable generation projects to potential investors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal Infrastructure Investments for Renewable Energy Integration in Germany
    Egerer, Jonas
    Schill, Wolf-Peter
    2014 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET (EEM), 2014,
  • [32] Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: Findings and policy implications from Flanders
    Bauwens, Thomas
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 : 841 - 852
  • [33] Satisfaction with Media Information about Renewable Energy Investments
    Karasmanaki, Evangelia
    Grigoroudis, Evangelos
    Galatsidas, Spyridon
    Tsantopoulos, Georgios
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [34] Renewable energy technologies as AIJ investments: Opportunities and issues
    Mathur, A
    GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION: TECHNOLOGIES FOR ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY, 1998, : 523 - 528
  • [35] Financing investments in renewable energy: the impacts of policy design
    Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, United States
    Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev, 4 (361-386):
  • [36] Evaluating investments in renewable energy under policy risks
    Gatzert, Nadine
    Vogl, Nikolai
    ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 95 : 238 - 252
  • [37] The impact of subsidy retraction on European renewable energy investments
    Sendstad, Lars H.
    Hagspiel, Verena
    Mikkelsen, Wilhelm Jebsen
    Ravndal, Ruben
    Tveitstol, Martin
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 160
  • [38] Investments in Renewable and Conventional Energy: The Role of Operational Flexibility
    Kok, A. Gurhan
    Shang, Kevin
    Yucel, Safak
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 22 (05) : 925 - 941
  • [39] A holistic risk management framework for renewable energy investments
    Abba, Z.Y.I.
    Balta-Ozkan, N.
    Hart, P.
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 160
  • [40] Real options approach to renewable energy investments in Mongolia
    Detert, Neal
    Kotani, Koji
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 56 : 136 - 150