Real options approach to renewable energy investments in Mongolia

被引:43
|
作者
Detert, Neal [1 ]
Kotani, Koji [2 ]
机构
[1] SusDev Solut Pte Ltd, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
[2] Int Univ Japan, Grad Sch Int Relat, Niigata 9497277, Japan
关键词
Renewable energy investment; Real options in discrete time; Coal prices; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Developing nations are seeking alternative energy for electricity, and one attractive alternative is renewable energy. This research analyzes changing investment environment for renewable energy with real options approach, and explores its potential in developing economies through studying the case of Mongolia under coal price uncertainty. To evaluate comparative attractiveness of either continuing to use coal-based infrastructures or switching to renewable energy, we formulate social revenue functions for the two environments, assuming that renewable energy has lower external costs, and coal prices follow geometric Brownian motion (GBM) or geometric mean-reverting (GMR) processes. We find the optimal trigger coal prices for switching technologies with some scenarios in electricity price and externality; characterize when renewable energy investments become attractive. In contrast to conventional wisdom, we identify some situations where the value of having more decision opportunities does not exceed that of a now-or-never decision for switching technologies, and welfare losses are incurred. The optimal trigger prices are higher in GBM than in GMR, and our result raises the possible risks for waiting to switch energy. To avoid welfare losses in Mongolia, the government should increase electricity prices or switch to renewable energy earlier, especially when people pay more for the removal of externalities. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 150
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach
    Boomsma, Trine Krogh
    Meade, Nigel
    Fleten, Stein-Erik
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 220 (01) : 225 - 237
  • [2] The use of real options approach in energy sector investments
    Fernandes, Bartolomeu
    Cunha, Jorge
    Ferreira, Paula
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09): : 4491 - 4497
  • [3] An integrated CVaR and real options approach to investments in the energy sector
    Fortin, Ines
    Fuss, Sabine
    Hlouskova, Jaroslava
    Khabarov, Nikolay
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Szolgayova, Jana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY MARKETS, 2008, 1 (02) : 61 - 85
  • [4] Evaluating environmental investments: A real options approach
    Cortazar, G
    Schwartz, ES
    Salinas, M
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (08) : 1059 - 1070
  • [5] Using the binomial model for the valuation of real options in computing optimal subsidies for Chinese renewable energy investments
    Liu, Xiaoran
    Ronn, Ehud I.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 87
  • [6] A Dynamic CVaR-Portfolio Approach Using Real Options: An Application to Energy Investments
    Szolgayova, Jana
    Fuss, Sabine
    Khabarov, Nikolay
    Obersteiner, Michael
    [J]. 2009 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET, 2009, : 215 - 221
  • [7] A real options approach to analyse wind energy investments under different support schemes
    Kitzing, Lena
    Juul, Nina
    Drud, Michael
    Boomsma, Trine Krogh
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 188 : 83 - 96
  • [8] A dynamic CVaR-portfolio approach using real options: an application to energy investments
    Szolgayova, Jana
    Fuss, Sabine
    Khabarov, Nikolay
    Obersteiner, Michael
    [J]. EUROPEAN TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL POWER, 2011, 21 (06): : 1825 - 1841
  • [9] Application of an advanced real options approach for renewable energy generation projects planning
    Martinez-Cesena, E. A.
    Mutale, J.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (04): : 2087 - 2094
  • [10] A Real Options Approach to Abatement Investments and Green Goodwill
    Tommy Lundgren
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003, 25 : 17 - 31