Single-level awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a Mayo Clinic institutional experience and national analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley [1 ]
Ghaith, Abdul Karim [2 ,3 ]
Bhandarkar, Archis R. [2 ,3 ]
De Biase, Gaetano [1 ]
Rajjoub, Rami [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Selby G. [1 ]
Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo [1 ]
Bydon, Mohamad [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Jacksonville, FL USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Rochester, MI USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Neuroinformat Lab, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
awake; anesthesia; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; TLIF; spine; TLIF;
D O I
10.3171/2021.9.FOCUS21457
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a novel technique for performing spinal fusions in patients under conscious sedation. Whether awake TLIF can reduce operative times and decrease the hospital length of stay (LOS) remains to be shown. In this study, the authors sought to assess the differences in clinical outcomes between patients who underwent awake TLIF and those who underwent TLIF under general anesthesia by using institutional experience at the Mayo Clinic and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. METHODS Chart review was performed for a consecutive series of patients who underwent single-level minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-TLIF performed by a single surgeon (K.A.I.) at a single institution. Additionally, the NSQIP database was queried from 2016 to 2019 for patients who underwent awake TLIF as well as propensity score- matched patients who underwent TLIF under general anesthesia. RESULTS A total of 20 patients at Mayo Clinic underwent awake single-level MIS-TLIF. The mean operative time was 122 +/- 16.68 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 39 +/- 30.24 ml. No intraoperative complications were reported. A total of 96 patients who underwent TLIF (24 awake and 72 under general anesthesia) were analyzed from the NSQIP database. The mean LOS was less in the awake cohort (1.4 +/- 1.381 days) than the general anesthesia cohort (3 +/- 2.274 days) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Evidence from the authors' institutional experience and national analysis has demonstrated that awake MIS-TLIF is efficient and can reduce hospital LOS.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single-level instrumented mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients
    Lee, Dong Yeob
    Jung, Tag-Geun
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [22] In Single-Level, Open, Posterior Lumbar Fusion, Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Posterolateral Fusion Lead to Better Outcomes?
    Chanbour, Hani
    Steinle, Anthony M.
    Tang, Alan R.
    Gardocki, Raymond J.
    Abtahi, Amir M.
    Stephens, Byron F.
    Zuckerman, Scott L.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 92 (01) : 110 - 117
  • [23] Biomechanical evaluation of different surgical procedures in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in vitro
    Cao, Yuanwu
    Liu, Fubing
    Wan, Shengcheng
    Liang, Yun
    Jiang, Chun
    Feng, Zhenzhou
    Jiang, Xiaoxing
    Chen, Zixian
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2017, 49 : 91 - 95
  • [24] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Local Bone Graft Alone for Single-Level Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
    Sleem, Ahmed
    Marzouk, Ashraf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 12 (01): : 70 - 75
  • [25] Validation of Impaction Grafting for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Technical Pearls and MicroCT Analysis
    Tortolani, Paul Justin
    Lucas, Sarah L.
    Pivazyan, Gnel
    Wang, Wenhai
    Cunningham, Bryan W.
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (06) : E70 - E77
  • [26] Effect of Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease
    Cheng, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Feng
    Zhang, Kai
    Sun, Xiaojiang
    Zhao, Changqing
    Li, Hua
    Li, Yan Michael
    Zhao, Jie
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 109 : E244 - E251
  • [27] Predictors of Spontaneous Restoration of Lumbar Lordosis after Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Ohyama, Shuhei
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Nakajima, Takayuki
    Sato, Yusuke
    Watanabe, Atsuya
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Kubota, Go
    Nakajima, Arata
    Saito, Junya
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Nakagawa, Koichi
    Ohtori, Seiji
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (06): : 397 - 404
  • [28] Comparison of Minimal Invasive Versus Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-level Lumbar Disease
    Kim, Ju-Eun
    Yoo, Hyun-Seung
    Choi, Dae-Jung
    Park, Eugene J.
    Jee, Seung-Min
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (02): : E64 - E71
  • [29] Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Tang, Guo-qing
    Han, Xiao
    Xing, Yong-gang
    Zhang, Qi
    He, Da
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 2093 - 2101
  • [30] Does Interbody Cage Lordosis and Position Affect Radiographic Outcomes After Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    DiMaria, Stephen
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Siegel, Nicholas
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Grewal, Lovy
    Jeyamohan, Hareindra R.
    Robinson, William A.
    Patel, Akul
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Kaye, Ian David
    Woods, Barrett, I
    Radcliff, Kris E.
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Chris K.
    Vaccaro, Alex R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (09): : E674 - E679