Validation of Impaction Grafting for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Technical Pearls and MicroCT Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Tortolani, Paul Justin [1 ]
Lucas, Sarah L. [2 ]
Pivazyan, Gnel [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Wenhai [5 ]
Cunningham, Bryan W. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland Towson, Dept Orthoped Surg, Towson, MD USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Union Mem Hosp, Musculoskeletal Res Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Washington, DC USA
[5] Globus Med Inc, Audubon, PA USA
[6] MedStar Union Mem Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
impaction grafting; arthrodesis; lumbar interbody device; transforaminal; HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; RATES;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000004559
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cadaveric study. Background Context. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) represents a well-documented operative surgical technique utilized in the management of lumbar pathology requiring interbody arthrodesis. The microstructural properties of impaction grafting (IG) after TLIF has yet to be reported. Purpose. The current study was designed first, to quantify the degree, to which IG augmentation would increase intrabody final bone volume and bone graft surface contact area with the endplates; secondly to quantify the volumes of locally harvested bone and bone needed for maximal impaction. Materials and Methods. Three cadaveric lumbosacral spine specimens were dissected into L1-L2, L3-L4, and L5-S1 motion segments for a total of 9 functional spinal units. Each interbody unit underwent a TLIF procedure with the implantation of an interbody spacer containing autogenous morselized bone. Microcomputed tomography scans were then performed to evaluate the final bone volume and bone surface contact area (BSCA). Subsequently, IG augmented TLIF procedure was carried and microcomputed tomography scans were repeated. Results. IG augmentation of TLIF exhibited a 346% increase in final bone volume (TLIF: 0.30 +/- 0.07 cm(3); IG-TLIF: 1.34 +/- 0.42 cm(3); P < 0.05) and a 152% increase in BSCA (TLIF: 45.06 +/- 15.47%; IG-TLIF: 68.28 +/- 6.85%; P < 0.05) when compared with the nonimpacted TLIF treatment. In addition, the average amount of autogenous bone collected was 8.21 +/- 2.08 cm(3), which sufficiently fulfilled the requirements for bone grafting (TLIF: 1.23 +/- 0.40 cm(3); IG-TLIF 6.42 +/- 1.20 cm(3)). Conclusions. IG augmentation of TLIF significantly improved final bone volume in the disc space and BSCA with vertebral endplates in vitro. Clinical Significance. Greater BSCA and final volume of bone graft reflect promisingly on their potential to increase fusion rates. Clinical studies will be needed to corroborate these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:E70 / E77
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Patel, Ravi
    Makda, Junaid
    Hong, Joseph
    Anderson, David G.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Albert, Todd J.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (08): : 623 - 629
  • [2] Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Patel, Jwalant Y.
    Kundnani, Vishal G.
    Chawada, Bansari
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [3] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Rezk, Essam Moneer Ali
    Elkholy, Ahmed Rizk
    Shamhoot, Ebrahim Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 34 (01)
  • [4] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Essam Moneer Ali Rezk
    Ahmed Rizk Elkholy
    Ebrahim Ahmed Shamhoot
    Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery, 34
  • [5] Response to: Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Patel, Jwalant Y.
    Kundnani, Vishal G.
    Chawada, Bansari
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (06) : 885 - 886
  • [6] Comparative Analysis of Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Wiltse Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Approaches for Treating Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Nurmukhametov, Renat
    Dosanov, Medet
    Medetbek, Abakirov
    Ramirez, Manuel De Jesus Encarnacion
    Chavda, Vishal
    Chmutin, Gennady
    Montemurro, Nicola
    SURGERIES, 2023, 4 (04): : 623 - 634
  • [7] A Comparative Study between Single-Level Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease
    Chang, Chung-Tse
    Lin, Yu-Hsien
    Wu, Yun-Che
    Shih, Cheng-Min
    Chen, Kun-Hui
    Pan, Chien-Chou
    Lee, Cheng-Hung
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (19)
  • [8] Is Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Superior to Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Retrospective Study
    Yin, Jianjian
    Jiang, Xijia
    Xu, Nanwei
    Nong, Luming
    Jiang, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 85 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [9] Comparison of Outcomes Between Single-level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Tan, Marcus Wei Ping
    Sayampanathan, Andrew A.
    Jiang, Lei
    Guo, Chang Ming
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (10): : 395 - 405
  • [10] Postoperative Opioid Use Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
    Toci, Gregory R.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Siegel, Nicholas M.
    Carter, Michael, V
    Curran, John G.
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Kaye, I. David
    Woods, Barrett, I
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 165 : E546 - E554