Validation of Impaction Grafting for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Technical Pearls and MicroCT Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Tortolani, Paul Justin [1 ]
Lucas, Sarah L. [2 ]
Pivazyan, Gnel [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Wenhai [5 ]
Cunningham, Bryan W. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland Towson, Dept Orthoped Surg, Towson, MD USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Union Mem Hosp, Musculoskeletal Res Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Washington, DC USA
[5] Globus Med Inc, Audubon, PA USA
[6] MedStar Union Mem Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
impaction grafting; arthrodesis; lumbar interbody device; transforaminal; HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; RATES;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000004559
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cadaveric study. Background Context. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) represents a well-documented operative surgical technique utilized in the management of lumbar pathology requiring interbody arthrodesis. The microstructural properties of impaction grafting (IG) after TLIF has yet to be reported. Purpose. The current study was designed first, to quantify the degree, to which IG augmentation would increase intrabody final bone volume and bone graft surface contact area with the endplates; secondly to quantify the volumes of locally harvested bone and bone needed for maximal impaction. Materials and Methods. Three cadaveric lumbosacral spine specimens were dissected into L1-L2, L3-L4, and L5-S1 motion segments for a total of 9 functional spinal units. Each interbody unit underwent a TLIF procedure with the implantation of an interbody spacer containing autogenous morselized bone. Microcomputed tomography scans were then performed to evaluate the final bone volume and bone surface contact area (BSCA). Subsequently, IG augmented TLIF procedure was carried and microcomputed tomography scans were repeated. Results. IG augmentation of TLIF exhibited a 346% increase in final bone volume (TLIF: 0.30 +/- 0.07 cm(3); IG-TLIF: 1.34 +/- 0.42 cm(3); P < 0.05) and a 152% increase in BSCA (TLIF: 45.06 +/- 15.47%; IG-TLIF: 68.28 +/- 6.85%; P < 0.05) when compared with the nonimpacted TLIF treatment. In addition, the average amount of autogenous bone collected was 8.21 +/- 2.08 cm(3), which sufficiently fulfilled the requirements for bone grafting (TLIF: 1.23 +/- 0.40 cm(3); IG-TLIF 6.42 +/- 1.20 cm(3)). Conclusions. IG augmentation of TLIF significantly improved final bone volume in the disc space and BSCA with vertebral endplates in vitro. Clinical Significance. Greater BSCA and final volume of bone graft reflect promisingly on their potential to increase fusion rates. Clinical studies will be needed to corroborate these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:E70 / E77
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications After Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Parrish, James M.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Yom, Kelly H.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Guntin, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (02): : 125 - 132
  • [42] Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Shen, Xiaolong
    Zhang, Hailong
    Gu, Xin
    Gu, Guangfei
    Zhou, Xu
    He, Shisheng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (09) : 1612 - 1616
  • [43] Efficacy of gelatin-thrombin matrix sealants for blood loss in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Abe, Tetsutaro
    Miyazaki, Masashi
    Sako, Noriaki
    Kanezaki, Shozo
    Hirakawa, Masashi
    Kawano, Masanori
    Kaku, Nobuhiro
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (36) : E34667
  • [44] Biomechanical evaluation of four different posterior instrumentation techniques for single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
    Guo, Hui-Zhi
    Tang, Yong-Chao
    Guo, Dan-Qing
    Liang, De
    Zhang, Shun-Cong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (10): : 6160 - 6169
  • [45] Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Yu, Bin
    Zhang, Jin
    Pan, Jie
    Wang, Yizhou
    Chen, YingGao
    Zhao, Weidong
    Wu, Desheng
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1213 - 1226
  • [46] Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Microendoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation
    Chen, Gang
    Li, Long Biao
    Shangguan, Zhitao
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Liu, Wenge
    Li, Jiandong
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (12) : 3300 - 3312
  • [47] Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Type I Changes
    Li, Pengfei
    Yang, Fengkai
    Tong, Yuexin
    Chen, Ying
    Song, Youxin
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 3511 - 3517
  • [48] Comparing Radiographic Parameters for Single-Level L5-S1 Interbody Fusion: Anterior Lumbar (ALIF) Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Edwards, Caleb S.
    Chan, Andrew Kai-Hong
    Chou, Dean
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 173 - 174
  • [49] Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 for an Obese Population
    Patel, Madhav Rajesh
    Jacob, Kevin Chacko
    Zamanian, Cameron
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael Clifford
    Vanjani, Nisheka Navin
    Singh, Kern
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (02) : 293 - 303
  • [50] Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Ribot, Max A.
    Parsons, Alexander W.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 157 : E111 - E122