Comparison of Outcomes Between Single-level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

被引:12
|
作者
Tan, Marcus Wei Ping [1 ]
Sayampanathan, Andrew A. [1 ]
Jiang, Lei [1 ]
Guo, Chang Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Singapore, Singapore
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2021年 / 34卷 / 10期
关键词
TLIF; LLIF; spine fusion; adult deformity correction; meta-analysis; systematic review; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DECOMPRESSION; DISABILITY; PARAMETERS; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001107
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This is a meta-analysis and systematic review of the available literature. Objective: This study aims to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Summary of Background Data: In the treatment of adult spinal deformity, LLIF allows interbody fusion while avoiding complications associated with an anterior or transforaminal approach, although the clinical outcomes of LLIF compared with other approaches have not been well established. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for 385 unique studies. On the basis of our exclusion criteria, 8 studies remained for our systematic review. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 using Mantel-Haenszel statistics and random effect models. This study identified self-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index, length of stay, blood loss, complication rate, and radiologic parameters (disk height, lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis). Results: Our meta-analysis showed that LLIF contributed to decreased blood loss [mean difference (MD) = -67.62 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): -104 to -30.90, P < 0.001], superior restoration of segmental lordosis (MD = 1.91 degrees, 95% CI: 0.71-3.10, P = 0.002), lumbar lordosis (MD =1.95 degrees, 95% CI: 0.15-3.74, P = 0.03), and disk height (MD = 2.18 mm, 95% CI: 1.18-3.17, P < 0.001) when compared with TLIF. However, current data suggests no significant difference in clinical outcomes between LLIF and TLIF based on overall complication rates (P = 0.22), length of hospital stay (P = 0.65), postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (P = 0.13), postoperative VAS Back Pain (P =0.47) and VAS Leg Pain (P =0.16). Conclusions: LLIF is an increasingly popular option for singlelevel anterior column reconstruction. When compared with single-level TLIF, single-level LLIF is associated with greater changes in lumbar lordosis and disk height. The single-level LLIF is a viable alternative to TLIF, demonstrating comparable clinical outcomes and better restoration of spinopelvic parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 405
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgical Outcomes After Single-Level Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Stone, Courtney E.
    Myers, Brandon L.
    Gupta, Sunny
    Giles, Tyler X.
    Patel, Neal A.
    Gendreau, Julian L.
    Abraham, Mickey E.
    Mammis, Antonios
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [2] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - systematic review and meta-analysis
    Phan, Kevin
    Thayaparan, Ganesha K.
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 29 (05) : 705 - 711
  • [3] A comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Qunhu
    Yuan, Zhen
    Zhou, Min
    Liu, Huan
    Xu, Yong
    Ren, Yongxin
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
  • [4] Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lan, Tao
    Hu, Shi-Yu
    Zhang, Yuan-Tao
    Zheng, Yu-Chen
    Zhang, Rui
    Shen, Zhe
    Yang, Xin-Jian
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 112 : 86 - 93
  • [5] A comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review and meta-analysis
    Qunhu Zhang
    Zhen Yuan
    Min Zhou
    Huan Liu
    Yong Xu
    Yongxin Ren
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15
  • [6] Comparison of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Na, Mengqi
    Zhan, Xinli
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (51)
  • [7] Comparison of Segmental Lordosis and Global Spinopelvic Alignment After Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Saadeh, Yamaan S.
    Joseph, Jacob R.
    Smith, Brandon W.
    Kirsch, Michael J.
    Sabbagh, Amr M.
    Park, Paul
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 126 : E1374 - E1378
  • [8] Comparison of Outcomes Between Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Retrospective Study
    Xu, Hongyao
    Yu, Lei
    Xiao, Bing
    Zhao, Hong
    Gu, Xin
    Gao, Zengxin
    Wang, Weiheng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 183 : E98 - E108
  • [9] Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Tang, Guo-qing
    Han, Xiao
    Xing, Yong-gang
    Zhang, Qi
    He, Da
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 2093 - 2101
  • [10] Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Keorochana, Gun
    Setrkraising, Kitipong
    Woratanarat, Patarawan
    Arirachakaran, Alisara
    Kongtharvonskul, Jatupon
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 41 (03) : 755 - 770