Comparison of Outcomes Between Single-level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

被引:12
|
作者
Tan, Marcus Wei Ping [1 ]
Sayampanathan, Andrew A. [1 ]
Jiang, Lei [1 ]
Guo, Chang Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Singapore, Singapore
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2021年 / 34卷 / 10期
关键词
TLIF; LLIF; spine fusion; adult deformity correction; meta-analysis; systematic review; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DECOMPRESSION; DISABILITY; PARAMETERS; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001107
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This is a meta-analysis and systematic review of the available literature. Objective: This study aims to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Summary of Background Data: In the treatment of adult spinal deformity, LLIF allows interbody fusion while avoiding complications associated with an anterior or transforaminal approach, although the clinical outcomes of LLIF compared with other approaches have not been well established. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for 385 unique studies. On the basis of our exclusion criteria, 8 studies remained for our systematic review. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 using Mantel-Haenszel statistics and random effect models. This study identified self-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index, length of stay, blood loss, complication rate, and radiologic parameters (disk height, lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis). Results: Our meta-analysis showed that LLIF contributed to decreased blood loss [mean difference (MD) = -67.62 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): -104 to -30.90, P < 0.001], superior restoration of segmental lordosis (MD = 1.91 degrees, 95% CI: 0.71-3.10, P = 0.002), lumbar lordosis (MD =1.95 degrees, 95% CI: 0.15-3.74, P = 0.03), and disk height (MD = 2.18 mm, 95% CI: 1.18-3.17, P < 0.001) when compared with TLIF. However, current data suggests no significant difference in clinical outcomes between LLIF and TLIF based on overall complication rates (P = 0.22), length of hospital stay (P = 0.65), postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (P = 0.13), postoperative VAS Back Pain (P =0.47) and VAS Leg Pain (P =0.16). Conclusions: LLIF is an increasingly popular option for singlelevel anterior column reconstruction. When compared with single-level TLIF, single-level LLIF is associated with greater changes in lumbar lordosis and disk height. The single-level LLIF is a viable alternative to TLIF, demonstrating comparable clinical outcomes and better restoration of spinopelvic parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 405
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of the Outcomes of Endoscopic Posterolateral Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Hu, Xijian
    Yan, Lei
    Chai, Jing
    Zhao, Xiaofeng
    Liu, Haifeng
    Zhu, Jinhuai
    Chai, Huo
    Zhao, Yibo
    Zhao, Bin
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2025,
  • [42] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Stadler, James A., III
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (02) : 377 - +
  • [43] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yun-lu Wang
    Xi-yong Li
    Lun Liu
    Song-feng Li
    Peng-fei Han
    Xiao-dong Li
    Neurosurgical Review, 46
  • [44] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yun-lu
    Li, Xi-yong
    Liu, Lun
    Li, Song-feng
    Han, Peng-fei
    Li, Xiao-dong
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [45] Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    You, Ki-Han
    Hyun, Jin-Tak
    Park, Sang-Min
    Kang, Min-Seok
    Cho, Samuel K.
    Park, Hyun-Jin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [46] Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis
    Aimin Li
    Xiang Li
    Yang Zhong
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13
  • [47] Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis
    Li, Aimin
    Li, Xiang
    Zhong, Yang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2018, 13
  • [48] Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (21) : E1382 - E1390
  • [49] Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
    Hiromitsu Takaoka
    Kazuhide Inage
    Yawara Eguchi
    Yasuhiro Shiga
    Takeo Furuya
    Satoshi Maki
    Yasuchika Aoki
    Masahiro Inoue
    Takayuki Fujiyoshi
    Takuya Miyamoto
    Yuji Noguchi
    Shinichiro Nakamura
    Tomoaki Kinoshita
    Takahito Kamada
    Hiroshi Takahashi
    Junya Saito
    Masaki Norimoto
    Toshiaki Kotani
    Tsuyoshi Sakuma
    Yasushi Iijima
    Tetsuhiro Ishikawa
    Tomotaka Umimura
    Mitsutoshi Ohta
    Miyako Suzuki-Narita
    Keigo Enomoto
    Takashi Sato
    Masashi Sato
    Masahiro Suzuki
    Takashi Hozumi
    Geundong Kim
    Norichika Mizuki
    Ryuto Tsuchiya
    Takuma Otagiri
    Tomohito Mukaihata
    Takahisa Hishiya
    Seiji Ohtori
    Sumihisa Orita
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [50] Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
    Takaoka, Hiromitsu
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Shiga, Yasuhiro
    Furuya, Takeo
    Maki, Satoshi
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Fujiyoshi, Takayuki
    Miyamoto, Takuya
    Noguchi, Yuji
    Nakamura, Shinichiro
    Kinoshita, Tomoaki
    Kamada, Takahito
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Saito, Junya
    Norimoto, Masaki
    Kotani, Toshiaki
    Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
    Iijima, Yasushi
    Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro
    Umimura, Tomotaka
    Ohta, Mitsutoshi
    Suzuki-Narita, Miyako
    Enomoto, Keigo
    Sato, Takashi
    Sato, Masashi
    Suzuki, Masahiro
    Hozumi, Takashi
    Kim, Geundong
    Mizuki, Norichika
    Tsuchiya, Ryuto
    Otagiri, Takuma
    Mukaihata, Tomohito
    Hishiya, Takahisa
    Ohtori, Seiji
    Orita, Sumihisa
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)