Single-level awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a Mayo Clinic institutional experience and national analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley [1 ]
Ghaith, Abdul Karim [2 ,3 ]
Bhandarkar, Archis R. [2 ,3 ]
De Biase, Gaetano [1 ]
Rajjoub, Rami [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Selby G. [1 ]
Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo [1 ]
Bydon, Mohamad [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Jacksonville, FL USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Rochester, MI USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Neuroinformat Lab, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
awake; anesthesia; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; TLIF; spine; TLIF;
D O I
10.3171/2021.9.FOCUS21457
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a novel technique for performing spinal fusions in patients under conscious sedation. Whether awake TLIF can reduce operative times and decrease the hospital length of stay (LOS) remains to be shown. In this study, the authors sought to assess the differences in clinical outcomes between patients who underwent awake TLIF and those who underwent TLIF under general anesthesia by using institutional experience at the Mayo Clinic and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. METHODS Chart review was performed for a consecutive series of patients who underwent single-level minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-TLIF performed by a single surgeon (K.A.I.) at a single institution. Additionally, the NSQIP database was queried from 2016 to 2019 for patients who underwent awake TLIF as well as propensity score- matched patients who underwent TLIF under general anesthesia. RESULTS A total of 20 patients at Mayo Clinic underwent awake single-level MIS-TLIF. The mean operative time was 122 +/- 16.68 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 39 +/- 30.24 ml. No intraoperative complications were reported. A total of 96 patients who underwent TLIF (24 awake and 72 under general anesthesia) were analyzed from the NSQIP database. The mean LOS was less in the awake cohort (1.4 +/- 1.381 days) than the general anesthesia cohort (3 +/- 2.274 days) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Evidence from the authors' institutional experience and national analysis has demonstrated that awake MIS-TLIF is efficient and can reduce hospital LOS.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Patel, Ravi
    Makda, Junaid
    Hong, Joseph
    Anderson, David G.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Albert, Todd J.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (08): : 623 - 629
  • [2] Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Patel, Jwalant Y.
    Kundnani, Vishal G.
    Chawada, Bansari
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [3] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Rezk, Essam Moneer Ali
    Elkholy, Ahmed Rizk
    Shamhoot, Ebrahim Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 34 (01)
  • [4] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Essam Moneer Ali Rezk
    Ahmed Rizk Elkholy
    Ebrahim Ahmed Shamhoot
    Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery, 34
  • [5] Response to: Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Patel, Jwalant Y.
    Kundnani, Vishal G.
    Chawada, Bansari
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (06) : 885 - 886
  • [6] Comparative Analysis of Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Wiltse Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Approaches for Treating Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Nurmukhametov, Renat
    Dosanov, Medet
    Medetbek, Abakirov
    Ramirez, Manuel De Jesus Encarnacion
    Chavda, Vishal
    Chmutin, Gennady
    Montemurro, Nicola
    SURGERIES, 2023, 4 (04): : 623 - 634
  • [7] A Comparative Study between Single-Level Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease
    Chang, Chung-Tse
    Lin, Yu-Hsien
    Wu, Yun-Che
    Shih, Cheng-Min
    Chen, Kun-Hui
    Pan, Chien-Chou
    Lee, Cheng-Hung
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (19)
  • [8] Early Experience With Uniplanar Versus Biplanar Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ledesma, Jonathan A.
    Ottaway, Jesse C.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Dees, Azra
    Thomas, Terence L.
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Radcliff, Kris E.
    Anderson, David G.
    NEUROSPINE, 2023, 20 (02) : 487 - +
  • [9] Is Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Superior to Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Retrospective Study
    Yin, Jianjian
    Jiang, Xijia
    Xu, Nanwei
    Nong, Luming
    Jiang, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 85 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [10] Comparison of Outcomes Between Single-level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Tan, Marcus Wei Ping
    Sayampanathan, Andrew A.
    Jiang, Lei
    Guo, Chang Ming
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (10): : 395 - 405