Estimation of percentiles using the Kriging method for uncertainty propagation

被引:3
|
作者
Soepyana, Frits Byron [1 ]
Cremaschi, Selen [1 ,4 ]
Sarica, Cem [2 ]
Subramani, Hariprasad J. [3 ]
Kouba, Gene E. [3 ]
Gao, Haijing [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tulsa, Russell Sch Chem Engn, 800 South Tucker Dr, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
[2] Univ Tulsa, McDougall Sch Petr Engn, 800 South Tucker Dr, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
[3] Chevron Energy Technol Co, 1400 Smith St, Houston, TX 77002 USA
[4] Auburn Univ, Dept Chem Engn, 212 Ross Hall, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
Uncertainty propagation; Model output uncertainty; Kriging surrogate model; Solid particle transport; Threshold velocity; CRITICAL VELOCITY; CHOOSING HYPERPARAMETERS; PIPELINE FLOW; MODEL; VALIDATION; QUANTIFICATION; INTERPOLATION; SIMULATION; TRANSPORT; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.05.015
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The use of simulation-based uncertainty propagation approaches (e.g., Monte Carlo simulation method) can be computationally expensive if evaluating the function requires a relatively large computation time. To reduce the computation time, uncertainty propagation methods that use surrogate models (e.g., the Kriging method) may be used. In this paper, we extend the Kriging method to propagate the uncertainties from multiple sources, and for cases where the distribution of the prediction is produced at each trial (replication) of the simulation-based uncertainty propagation approach (i.e., at each sample point). The outputs of the methodology are the approximate percentiles of the output distribution. The capability of the methodology is tested using a Case Study involving the transport of solid particles in pipelines to prevent solid particle deposition and improve pipeline efficiency. Statistical comparisons suggest that our methodology successfully replicates the outputs from the Monte Carlo simulation method with a 94% reduction in computational cost. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 159
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The radio environment map parameter estimation using kriging method based on propagation model
    Center of Radio Administrator and Technology Development, Xihua University, Chengdu, China
    J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 20 (7607-7616):
  • [2] Orbital Uncertainty Propagation with PC-Kriging
    Jia, Bin
    Xin, Ming
    2020 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2020, : 4195 - 4200
  • [3] Influence of parameter estimation uncertainty in Kriging
    Todini, E
    Ferraresi, M
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1996, 175 (1-4) : 555 - 566
  • [4] Using Percentiles to Communicate Snowfall Uncertainty
    Novak, David R.
    Brill, Keith F.
    Hogsett, Wallace A.
    WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2014, 29 (05) : 1259 - 1265
  • [5] Validation of method of moments for uncertainty propagation in reliability estimation
    Rausch, Mitchell
    Liao, Haitao
    THIRTEENTH ISSAT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY AND QUALITY IN DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 112 - +
  • [6] Estimation of Code Ionospheric Biases using Kriging Method
    Wen, Zhibo
    Zhu, Yuji
    Henkel, Patrick
    Guenther, Christoph
    2015 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2015,
  • [7] Gradient-Enhanced Universal Kriging for Uncertainty Propagation
    Lockwood, Brian A.
    Anitescu, Mihai
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 170 (02) : 168 - 195
  • [8] Uncertainty propagation using the point estimate method
    Mishra, S
    CALIBRATION AND RELIABILITY IN GROUNDWATER MODELLING: COPING WITH UNCERTAINTY, 2000, (265): : 292 - 296
  • [9] Propagation of uncertainty with arbitrarily distributions by kernel density estimation method
    Jinuntuya, P.
    Jinuntuya, N.
    19TH SIAM PHYSICS CONGRESS, 2025, 2934
  • [10] An efficient method for uncertainty propagation in robust software performance estimation
    Aleti, Aldeida
    Trubiani, Catia
    van Hoorn, Andre
    Jamshidi, Pooyan
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2018, 138 : 222 - 235