Disentangling the Pathways and Effects of Ecosystem Service Co-Production

被引:50
|
作者
Palomo, Ignacio [1 ,2 ]
Felipe-Lucia, Maria R. [3 ,4 ]
Bennett, Elena M. [5 ,6 ]
Martin-Lopez, Berta [7 ]
Pascual, Unai [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Bilbao, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, Edificio Biol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Bern, Inst Plant Sci, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Inst Pirenaico Ecol CSIC, Av Nuestra Senora Victoria S-N, Jaca, Spain
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, McGill Sch Environm, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[7] Leuphana Univ, Inst Eth & Transdisciplinary Sustainabil Res, Fac Sustainabil, Luneburg, Germany
[8] Basque Fdn Sci, Ikerbasque, Bilbao, Spain
[9] Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England
关键词
SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; LIVESTOCK FARMING SYSTEMS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; ALMERIA PROVINCE; PROTECTED AREAS; TRADE-OFFS; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.003
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Research on ecosystem services has become a dominant field within environmental management, framing the way in which human-nature relationships are understood and managed. Although ecosystem services are usually defined as 'the benefits that humans receive from nature', our work shows that most services are actually co-produced by a mixture of natural capital and various forms of social, human, financial and technological capital. Here, we review how ecosystem services are co-produced, and then we assess how this affects the quantity, quality, trade-offs, resilience and the equity of the distribution of ecosystem services. Then we discuss the implications of co-production for sustainability. Finally, we present some challenges for an adequate consideration of co-production within the assessment of ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 283
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Co-production of service innovations through dynamic capability enhancement
    Chen, Ja-Shen
    Kerr, Don
    Tsang, Seng-Su
    Sung, Yu Chieh
    SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2015, 35 (1-2): : 96 - 114
  • [22] Urban service co-production and technology: nine key issues
    Faldi, Giuseppe
    Ranzato, Marco
    Moretto, Luisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 14 (01) : 146 - 161
  • [23] Co-Production in Service-Dominant Logic: Antecedents and Consequences
    Wu, Li-Wei
    NTU MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 27 (01): : 25 - 62
  • [24] Co-production and self-service: The application of Service-Dominant Logic
    Hilton, Toni
    Hughes, Tim
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2013, 29 (7-8) : 861 - 881
  • [25] A service behavior model for description of co-production feature of services
    Mo, Tong
    Xu, Xiaofei
    Wang, Zhongjie
    ENTERPRISE INTEROPERABILITY III: NEW CHALLENGES AND INDUSTRIAL APPROACHES, 2008, : 247 - 260
  • [26] CUSTOMER CO-PRODUCTION AND SERVICE INNOVATION CHARACTERISTICS: A CONCEPTUAL ARGUMENT
    Zolfagharian, Mohammad Ali
    Paswan, Audhesh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE (AMS) ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2015, : 156 - 156
  • [27] Co-production and Service Quality: The Case of Cooperative Childcare in Sweden
    Vamstad, Johan
    VOLUNTAS, 2012, 23 (04): : 1173 - 1188
  • [28] Co-production of service experiences: insights from the cultural sector
    Minkiewicz, Joanna
    Bridson, Kerrie
    Evans, Jody
    JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, 2016, 30 (07) : 749 - 761
  • [29] Integrating climate service co-production into spatial planning in Jakarta
    Putra, Arya Lahasa
    Martinez, Javier
    Verplanke, Jeroen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020,
  • [30] Understanding core IS capabilities throughout the IS/IT service co-production lifecycle
    Kasraian, Laleh
    Sammon, David
    Grace, Audrey
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2016, 25 : 290 - 301